the second half of GWA Part 1 (pp. 21-37)

reply to both questions below about the second half of GWA Part 1 (pp. 21-37). Then end your post by asking a question about the reading. I will use this discussion to inform our in-class discussion so remember what you wrote in case I ask you to elaborate or if your question gets answered.

1. Provide at least two reasons that Ved?ntins claim that primordial matter could never initiate creation on its own, as found in s?tras 2.2.4-7 (GWA 24-29). BONUS: Why do you think a conscious God (i.e., Brahman or ??vara), standing above creation, would solve these problems?

2. Briefly explain S??khya’s major counterargument to s?tra 2.2.10 (GWA 33-34), that it is rather Vedanta which has a problem, since, according to its own non-dualism, it cannot properly explain how the suffering individual can seek to end its suffering. BONUS: Do you think the Ved?ntic response to this is adequate?

Again, make sure to end each response with a question about the reading to your instructor or classmates. Replying to your classmates is optional but may afford extra credit if your replies are thoughtful and accurate.

Important criteria for your SUMMARY —a quotation or short passage along with clarifying remarks, definitions, and contextual info.

Relative Length: Each summary should be no more than 50% of the entry

Terms: Make sure to briefly define any special terms when you introduce them

Important criteria for your ANALYSIS —an argument for an unobvious interpretation or a practical application of the text

Relative Length: Each analysis should be more than 50% of the entry

Thesis: There should be an easily-identifiable thesis (your ‘stance’, position, or interpretation of that part of the reading you summarized)

Argument: Justify your thesis with a brief argument (i.e., why you’re taking that ‘stance’ or why you think your interpretation is helpful)

Examples (optional): Provide examples from your own life if you think they’d be helpful. In general, I’m fine with first-person pronouns.