The topic is Incorporating Social Emotional Learning (SEL) and Biblical Worldview in Christian Schools? also follow the advanced side of the grading rubricArticleReviewsAssignme
The topic is Incorporating Social Emotional Learning (SEL) and Biblical Worldview in Christian Schools
also follow the advanced side of the grading rubric
EDUC 798
Article Reviews Assignment Instructions
For this assignment, you will write reviews on three separate research-based articles. Select the three articles you would like to review from scholarly, peer-reviewed research journals. The articles you select should not be articles you have previously reviewed for this or another course but should reflect the research topic you identified in Discussion: Research Topic. The articles you choose must have been published within the past five years.
Concisely summarizing large amounts of data is a skill that researchers must master for both data they generate and for conveying the relevant works of others in their own literature reviews. Therefore, the length of this assignment is to be a single page for each review for a total of three pages (not including the required title page). Each one-page review must include the following, appearing in the same order as listed below:
1. A one-paragraph summary of the research-based article. What was done? How? What was found?
2. A one-paragraph analysis of the research-based article. Note: This should not be a summary of the analysis conducted by the article's author(s); instead, it is your critical analysis of the quality of the research conducted. For example: What was good? What could be better? How would you have changed the research?
3. A one-paragraph summary of the research-based article's importance to the education field.
4. A properly-formatted APA reference entry for the article at the bottom of the page.
Use current APA style throughout the paper.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
,
Criteria Ratings Points
Assessment 77 to >70 pts
Advanced
Key points concisely summarized with balance, clarity, and relevance.
70 to >64 pts
Proficient
Most key points summarized with clarity and relevance.
64 to >0 pts
Developing
While some key points are addressed, there is a lack of focus, and important information is neglected.
0 pts
Not Present
77 pts
Personal Analysis Critique Paragraph
40 to >36 pts
Advanced
Relevant and legitimate information clearly supports critique of the quality of the research reviewed. It is thoughtful, focused, in depth analysis of the significant topic.
36 to >33 pts
Proficient
Information provides reasonable support for a critique of the quality of the research reviewed. It displays evidence of a basic analysis.
33 to >0 pts
Developing
Information supports a critique of the quality of the research reviewed. Analysis is basic and general. Reader gains few insights.
0 pts
Not Present
40 pts
Personal and Practical Application
40 to >36 pts
Advanced
Applies the information learned appropriately with good personal insight for application or future use.
36 to >33 pts
Proficient
Applies most of the information learned appropriately with some personal insight for application or future use.
33 to >0 pts
Developing
Applies some of the information learned appropriately with little personal insight for application or future use.
0 pts
Not Present
40 pts
Sentence Structure
20 to >17 pts
Advanced
Sentences are well-phrased and varied in length and structure. Writing displays concise, interesting and focused introductory and concluding sentences.
17 to >16 pts
Proficient
Sentences are well-phrased, and there is some variety in length and structure. Writing displays clear introductory and concluding sentences.
16 to >0 pts
Developing
Some sentences are awkwardly constructed so that the reader is occasionally distracted. Writing displays vague introductory and concluding sentences.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Article Reviews Grading Rubric | EDUC798_B02_202430
Criteria Ratings Points
Mechanics, Page Count, and Current APA Format
48 to >43 pts
Advanced
The writing is free of mechanical, grammatical, and formatting errors. Each of the 3 reviews strictly adheres the 1-page requirement.
43 to >39 pts
Proficient
There are 1–3 mechanical, grammatical, and/or formatting errors, but they do not represent a major distraction or obscure meaning. Each of the 3 reviews closely adheres the 1-page requirement.
39 to >0 pts
Developing
The writing has many errors. The 3 reviews do not strictly adhere to the 1-page requirement.
0 pts
Not Present
48 pts
Total Points: 225
Article Reviews Grading Rubric | EDUC798_B02_202430
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
