Explain why Pavlov’s experiments in reflexology were an important part in the development of psychology. De scribe behaviorism from Watson’s perspective; then, compare and con
Justify your answers with appropriate research and reasoning. Comment on 2 Reponses that is on attachment
- Ex plain why Pavlov's experiments in reflexology were an important part in the development of psychology.
- De scribe behaviorism from Watson’s perspective; then, compare and contrast his viewpoints with operational positivism and the prevailing functionalism.
- What are the major similarities and differences between Watson and Skinner's behaviorism? From your understanding of psychological principles, which of them had a greater influence in the areas of both research and applied psychology?
- Psychology seems to have emerged as a science, but with an eclectic view of how to understand behavior. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Is there a difference between the research aspect of psychology and the applied side of psychology in terms of theoretical perspectives?
Response 1
The journey of psychology from its early biological roots to the diverse field it is today has been marked by significant milestones. Among these, Ivan Pavlov’s experiments in reflexology stand as a foundational pillar in the development of psychological science. Pavlov’s work transcended the mere biological basis of behavior by introducing the concept of conditioned responses, which became a cornerstone for subsequent theories in psychology.
Pavlov’s classical conditioning demonstrated that behaviors could be learned through association, a principle that was not only groundbreaking but also pivotal for the future study of learning and behavior. His experiments with dogs, where a neutral stimulus (a bell) became associated with an unconditioned stimulus (food), leading to a conditioned response (salivation), illustrated the mechanics of learning in a way that biological explanations alone could not account for. This understanding of learned behaviors opened new avenues for exploring how environmental factors could influence actions, thereby expanding the scope of psychological research beyond innate or purely biological processes.
Behaviorism, as articulated by John B. Watson, took Pavlov’s ideas further by asserting that all behaviors could be understood through observable actions, dismissing the need to consider internal mental states. Watson’s perspective on behaviorism emphasized the role of environmental stimuli in shaping behavior, a view that stood in contrast to the prevailing functionalism, which sought to understand the purpose of mental processes, and operational positivism, which focused on the verification of hypotheses through empirical means.
Comparing Watson’s behaviorism with B.F Skinner’s, we find both similarities and differences. Both psychologists shared a belief in the power of the environment to mold behavior and dismissed introspection as a valid method of psychological investigation. However, Skinner introduced the concept of operant conditioning, which expanded upon the idea of behavioral consequences influencing the likelihood of a behavior’s occurrence. Skinner’s work provided a more comprehensive framework for understanding the complexity of behavior modification and its applications.
In terms of influence, both Watson and Skinner contributed significantly to the field of psychology. Watson laid the groundwork for behavior analysis and inspired a generation of psychologists to focus on observable behavior. Skinner, on the other hand, offered practical applications through his operant conditioning principle, which has been widely used in educational settings, therapy, and behavior modification programs. While it is challenging to quantify their respective influences, Skinner’s contributions to applied psychology are particularly notable due to their ongoing relevance in therapeutic and educational interventions.
Psychology, indeed, has emerged as a science with an eclectic approach to understanding behavior. This eclecticism reflects the complexity of human behavior, which cannot be fully explained by any single theoretical perspective. Research in psychology often focuses on developing and testing theories to understand the underlying mechanisms of behavior, while applied psychology seeks to utilize these findings to address real-world problems. The distinction between research and application in psychology is evident in the methodologies and objectives of each domain; however, they are interconnected, with research informing practice and vice versa.
In conclusion, the evolution of psychology from Pavlov’s classical conditioning to the current eclectic approach underscores the dynamic nature of the field. As our understanding of behavior continues to grow, so too does the recognition that no single theory can encapsulate the full spectrum of human psychology. The interplay between research and applied psychology enriches both areas, ensuring that theoretical advancements translate into practical benefits for society.
References
Henley, T. (2018). Hergenhahn's An Introduction to the History of Psychology (8th ed.). Cengage. ISBN: 9781337564151
Pavlov’s Classical Conditioning https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jd7Jdug5SRc&t=184s
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.