One of the major responsibilities of HR is to, of course, manage human capital.

One of the major responsibilities of HR is to, of course, manage human capital. This continues after employee hiring and continues through termination and succession. Having effective policies in place that define these, and other functions in between is critical to an organization’s commitment to ethical, legal, fair, and efficient operating practices. In this assignment, you are asked to share best practices or policies on these topics during a series of brown bag sessions (these are informal lunchtime presentations).

 

Scenario

Imagine that HR leadership is busy integrating the HR teams from both hospitals and they want to make sure department members are operating in concert with one another on a range of topics. Over the next several weeks, leadership plans to have you conduct three brown bag sessions (informal lunch-time presentations) that examine the topics of record keeping, ethics and law, and succession planning. They have asked you to write an executive summary of the content planned for each session in advance.

 

Session Descriptions:

Session 1: Maintaining Accurate Employee Records—In this session, you identify, and elaborate upon, four reasons for maintaining accurate and objective employee records.

Session 2: Ethical and Legal Termination—In this session, you examine the legal and ethical aspects of selecting and terminating an employee out of a group of people with similar performance, behaviors, and jobs as a part of a broad-ranging cost-saving initiative. Employee differences:

One has a disability.

One is paid significantly more than the others.

One is 60 years of age and older than the others.

One is planning on soon taking an extended family leave

Session 3: Succession Planning—In this session, you recommend a process to identify and groom an internal candidate to move into a senior-level leadership position in a health care organization such as CEO, COO, and CFO.

Instructions

Consider the scenario above and imagine that your audience is a group of department managers. Write an executive summary that introduces the topics in an introductory paragraph and then describes the content to be delivered in each of the three sessions in detail. Each session description should be two pages in length (six total pages plus a cover page).

 

Your work will be measured against the following criteria:

 

Identify, and elaborate upon, four reasons for maintaining accurate and objective employee records.

Analyze the legal implications or requirements of a termination decision. (Make sure to reference specific statutes or laws that govern this area of employment law.)

Analyze the ethical facets of a termination decision. (Make sure to reference an ethical framework to support your assertions or positions.)

Recommend and justify a process to identify and groom a candidate for a senior-level position.

Additional Requirements

Resources: Use four sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment. For help with research, writing, and citation, access the library or review library guides.

SWS: This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the Library site for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:

 

Propose procedures related to maintaining employee records, ensuring legal and ethical standards during employee terminations, and executive succession planning.

View Rubric

 

Week 9 Assignment – Records, Termination, and Succession

Week 9 Assignment – Records, Termination, and Succession

Criteria Ratings Pts

Identify, and elaborate upon, four reasons for maintaining accurate and objective employee records.

view longer description

 

36 to >32.4 pts

 

Exemplary

 

Thoroughly identified, and elaborated upon, four reasons for maintaining accurate and objective employee records.

32.4 to >28.8 pts

 

Competent

 

Satisfactorily identified, and elaborated upon, four reasons for maintaining accurate and objective employee records.

28.8 to >25.2 pts

 

Needs Improvement

 

Partially identified, and elaborated upon, four reasons for maintaining accurate and objective employee records.

25.2 to >0 pts

 

Unacceptable

 

Did not submit or did not identify, and elaborate upon, four reasons for maintaining accurate and objective employee records.

/ 36 pts

 

Analyze the legal implications or requirements of a termination decision.

 

view longer description

 

36 to >32.4 pts

 

Exemplary

 

Thoroughly analyzed the legal implications or requirements of a termination decision.

32.4 to >28.8 pts

 

Competent

 

Satisfactorily analyzed the legal implications or requirements of a termination decision.

28.8 to >25.2 pts

 

Needs Improvement

 

Partially analyzed the legal implications or requirements of a termination decision.

25.2 to >0 pts

 

Unacceptable

 

Did not submit or did not analyze the legal implications or requirements of a termination decision.

/ 36 pts

 

Analyze the ethical facets of a termination decision.

 

view longer description

 

36 to >32.4 pts

 

Exemplary

 

Thoroughly analyzed the ethical facets of a termination decision.

32.4 to >28.8 pts

 

Competent

 

Satisfactorily analyzed the ethical facets of a termination decision.

28.8 to >25.2 pts

 

Needs Improvement

 

Partially analyzed the ethical facets of a termination decision.

25.2 to >0 pts

 

Unacceptable

 

Did not submit or did not analyze the ethical facets of a termination decision.

/ 36 pts

 

Recommend and justify a process to identify and groom a candidate for a senior-level position.

 

view longer description

 

45 to >40.5 pts

 

Exemplary

 

Thoroughly recommended and justified a process to identify and groom a candidate for a senior-level position.

40.5 to >36 pts

 

Competent

 

Satisfactorily recommended and justified a process to identify and groom a candidate for a senior-level position.

36 to >31.5 pts

 

Needs Improvement

 

Partially recommended and justified a process to identify and groom a candidate for a senior-level position.

31.5 to >0 pts

 

Unacceptable

 

Did not submit or did not recommend and justify a process to identify and groom a candidate for a senior-level position.

/ 45 pts

 

Four references.

 

view longer description

 

9 to >8.1 pts

 

Exemplary

 

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

8.1 to >7.2 pts

 

Competent

 

Meets number of required references.

7.2 to >6.3 pts

 

Needs Improvement

 

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

6.3 to >0 pts

 

Unacceptable

 

No references provided.

/ 9 pts

 

Clarity, writing mechanics, and SWS formatting requirements.

 

view longer description

 

18 to >16.2 pts

 

Exemplary

 

0–2 errors present.

16.2 to >14.4 pts

 

Competent

 

3–4 errors present.

14.4 to >12.6 pts

 

Needs Improvement

 

5–6 errors present.

12.6 to >0 pts

 

Unacceptable

 

More than 6 errors present.