No plagiarism and please read everything in the attachment and about what websites you cannot use, let me know what attachments you need
No plagiarism and please read everything in the attachment and about what websites you cannot use, let me know what attachments you need, you can pick which two to write about, and made sure you see how much paragraphs and sentences, its should be 5-6 sentences and check how many paragraphs which is all right under this text exactly as says to make sure all the points are reached
Unit 3 Rubric: Causal Analysis
Unit 3 Rubric: Causal Analysis
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome3-Stage Introductory ParagraphA proper three-stage introduction to an essay will 1) begin with a hook that rhetorically captures the reader’s attention or establishes the broader context for the discussion to come; 2) identify the specific topic (in this case, the folktale, legend, or mystery to be analytically critiqued); and, 3) assert a complex thesis statement (a skeptical claim) that forecasts the nature of the argument ahead, as well as its pattern of development .
1 pts
Effective
All three stages are present, and they are developed adequately or better.
0.45 pts
Incomplete
One or more stages of the introduction are missing or poorly developed.
0 pts
Needs Work, or Is Missing
No three-stage introduction is provided, or the introduction is too brief and/or too underdeveloped.
1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBody: Case OverviewA detailed overview and summary of the chosen example (folktale, legend, phenomenon, mystery, etc.) and why/how it should be discounted as magical thinking and/or pseudoscience.
0.75 pts
Effective and Complete
0 pts
Ineffective or Missing
0.75 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBody: Causal AnalysisA minimum of three body paragraphs should be used to examine in detail what you believe to be the underlying factors that cause people to continue to believe in claims like the one in the case example. Each paragraph should 1) focus on one underlying reason or cause at a time; 2) examine contributing sociological or cultural factors and/or cognitive factors such as confirmation bias; 3)
be developed and coherently organized according to the five stages of analytical paragraphing; and 4) include properly cited quotations for reinforcement of your own arguments.
3.5 pts
Effective and Complete
A minimum of three separate but related critical points are developed and supported, each in their own paragraph. Outside support is used effectively to reinforce arguments. Analysis is developed persuasively.
1.75 pts
Incomplete or Underdeveloped
Fewer than three points are made, and/or arguments are consistently underdeveloped. Outside support is utilized, but ineffectively (e.g., used in lieu of the writer’s own points, instead of for reinforcement).
0 pts
Needs Work
Analysis is missing from the essay’s body, which may instead merely extended the summary paragraph with a long narrative. The writer may have departed from the objectives of the prompt, excluding critical arguments altogether.
3.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusionAn editorializing conclusion is provided in a single, final paragraph. For this essay assignment, the conclusion should be a single paragraph, and it should NOT be a summary conclusion.
1.5 pts
Effective
Final paragraph is rhetorically effective and successfully follows the guidelines for either an externalizing conclusion or an editorializing conclusion.
0 pts
Ineffective
A conclusion has either been omitted, or the writer has chosen to ignore the prompt and use a straightforward summary conclusion.
1.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting CompetencyCompetent writing should 1) avoid common errors of grammar, punctuation, sentence mechanics, and usage; 2) contain effectively organized and cohesively developed paragraphs that have controlling topic statements, clear explanation, good use of support, and proper discussion/interpretation of these; 3) use language with precision and control; 4) use a respectfully neutral tone free of slang, vulgarity, and colloquialisms; 5) demonstrate it has undergone editing and refinement before being submitted.
1 to >0.55 pts
Competent
Generally competent in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph organization/development, punctuation, and usage. Score may reflect the degree of success in 5-stage paragraph development.
0.55 to >0 pts
Needs Work
Develop a better editing and proofreading regimen, or seek writing assistance from NetTutor or the Writing Center at Grossmont College.
1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDocument Design and StyleCorrect MLA style should be demonstrate in 1) document design and layout with regard to title page, margins, headers and pagination, and typography (font size and types); 2) double-spacing throughout (including Works Cited); paragraph indention; parenthetical (contextual) citations; 3) bibliographic references organized and a Works Cited set with hanging indentions; 4) demonstrate it has undergone an adjustment of settings to effect MLA style, or that it you have made use of the MLA document template.
0.75 pts
Good MLA style
0 pts
Needs review and improvement
Use the MLA document template!
0.75 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormattingDocument Formatting: Document should 1) be saved in a supported file type such as MS Word or PDF; 2) possess a file name consistent with the required file-naming protocols (e.g., Surname_G-120-3039-2-FIN.pdf).
0.5 pts
Correctly formatted
0 pts
Incorrectly formatted
Review file-naming protocols, or use the name of the MLA document template as a guide.
0.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome22FA-ENGL 120-3Contextualize, integrate, and synthesize diverse perspectives, using appropriate documentation.
threshold: 2.0 pts
3 ptsExceeds Standard
2 ptsMeets Standard
1 ptsDoes Not Meet Standard
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome22FA-ENGL 120-1Identify, analyze, and evaluate the rhetorical strategies in a variety of culturally relevant texts.
threshold: 2.0 pts
3 ptsExceeds Standard
2 ptsMeets Standard
1 ptsDoes Not Meet Standard
3 pts
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
