in this assignment you will be given a hypothetical employment scenario and you will be asked to draft two (2) versions of an employment contract based on the hypothetical information provided.
Need help with this assignment?Get an original answer from a qualified tutor — from $10/page.
Get it written →in this assignment you will be given a hypothetical employment scenario and you will be asked to draft two (2) versions of an employment contract based on the hypothetical information provided. In one version, your client will be the employer. In the second contract you draft, your client will be the employee. Both versions of the contract will have many common provisions. However, to protect your respective clients and their specific demands, you will need to include provisions and clauses in one version that may not be beneficial to the other client and, hence, not be in the other version of the employment contract. This assignment will help develop your contract drafting skills as well as your contract negotiation skills.
Employment Contract Project Instructions.pdf Download Employment Contract Project Instructions.pdf
Assignment Rubric.pdfDownload Assignment Rubric.pdf
Rubric
Assignment Rubric
Assignment Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
50 to >45.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Completely, thoroughly, and logically responds to all components of the question; shows evidence of exceptional critical thinking; AND/or meets the length.
45 to >40.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Responds to question in a meaningful way; shows evidence of critical thinking; provides basic evidence/support; AND/or meets the length.
40 to >30.0 pts
Approaches Expectations
Partially responds to question in a meaningful way; response may lack completeness or evidence of critical thinking; does not provide enough evidence/support; AND/or does not meet the length.
30 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Response is not complete and/or is missing important information; lacks critical analysis of the topic; provides poor evidence/support; AND/or does not meet the length.
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcomecoherence
27 to >24.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Effectively communicates ideas or points in a logical and organized manner. Reflections are sophisticated and formulate wholly appropriate and pertinent connections.
24 to >21.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Communicates ideas or points in a manner that is mostly logical and organized. Reflections formulate appropriate connections.
21 to >18.0 pts
Approaches Expectations
Communicates ideas or points in a manner that demonstrates a limited understanding of content organization. Attempts to reflect upon journal topic, but the connections are vague.
18 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Attempts to communicate ideas or points; however, the content organization is extremely limited. Fails to provide a reflection that makes connections.
27 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcomemechanics
13 to >10.0 pts
Full Marks
Assignment contains no errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.
10 to >7.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Assignment contains only a few minor errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure, but they do not distract the reader from the content.
7 to >0.0 pts
Approaches Expectations
Assignment contains a few errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure, which slightly distract the reader from the content.
0 pts
Below Expectations
Assignment contains major errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure, which distract the reader from the content.
13 pts
Total Points: 90
Get a plagiarism-free answer to this question
Send us your instructions and we’ll match you with the best writer in your subject.
- 100% human-written, zero AI
- Turnitin report included
- Confidential — we never share your data
- Free revisions & refunds