Click on this link to view the DNR Interactive Case Study.
Click on this link to view the DNR Interactive Case Study.
After you view the case study, respond to the following:
What is the role of the nurse? List two actions (interventions) you would have done differently in this scenario with rationales.
What is the role of the family?
Clearly relate the Nursing Code of Ethics to the case study scenario.
A minimum of 500 substantial words is required. Do not exceed 600 words. No cover page is required. References must be no older than five years from today’s date. Your submission should be double-spaced. Use the following headings in your paper:
Role of the Nurse
Actions/Interventions
Role of the Family
View the rubric for details on how this assignment will be graded.NURS_440_OL – Week 1 Case Study Rubric
NURS_440_OL – Week 1 Case Study Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
20 to >17.8 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Presents an exemplary articulation and insightful analysis of significant concepts and/or theories presented in the case. Offers detailed and specific examples for all questions. Makes keen observations, making note of essential information provided in the case. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; writing is supported by timely scientific evidence. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions.
17.8 to >15.0 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Presents an accurate analysis of significant concepts and/or theories presented in the case. Offers some detail and some examples for most questions. Makes occasional note of essential information provided in the case. Writing is mostly supported by timely scientific evidence. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions.
15 to >11.8 pts
Below Expectations
Provides insufficient explanations of significant concepts. Offers little or insignificant detail and no examples for most questions. Fails to address essential information provided in the case. Writing is generally supported by timely scientific evidence. Fails to draw conclusion.
11.8 to >0 pts
Not Meeting Expectations
Does not, or incorrectly, answers with insufficient explanations. Writing is not supported by timely scientific evidence.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
15 to >13.35 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Makes insightful, clear and accurate connections to key concepts, interventions, and the nursing code of ethics. Response indicates a comprehensive, high-level understanding of the concepts presented in the case.
13.35 to >11.25 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Makes mostly accurate connections to key concepts, interventions, and the nursing code of ethics. Response indicates a general understanding of the concepts presented in the case.
11.25 to >8.85 pts
Below Expectations
Provides several insufficient or inaccurate explanations, although attempts are made to address some key concepts, interventions, and the nursing code of ethics. Response indicates an introductory understanding of the concepts presented in the case.
8.85 to >0 pts
Not Meeting Expectations
Information is inaccurate or inadequate. Response indicates little or no understanding of the concepts presented in the case.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
10 to >8.9 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Answers are well written throughout. Information is well organized and clearly communicated. Assignment is free of spelling and grammatical errors.
8.9 to >7.5 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Answers are well written throughout and the information is reasonably organized and communicated. Assignment is mostly free of spelling and grammatical errors.
7.5 to >5.9 pts
Below Expectations
Answers are somewhat organized and lacks some clarity. Contains some spelling and grammatical errors.
5.9 to >0 pts
Not Meeting Expectations
Answers are not well written and lack clarity. Information is poorly organized. Assignment contains many spelling and grammatical errors.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format
5 to >4.45 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Follows all the requirements related to format, length, references, and layout.
4.45 to >3.75 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Follows length requirements and most of the requirements related to format, length, references, and layout.
3.75 to >2.95 pts
Below Expectations
Follows most of the requirements related to format, length, references, and layout.
2.95 to >0 pts
Not Meeting Expectations
Does not follow format, length, references, and layout.
5 pts
Total Points: 50
PreviousNext
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
