Case Study Paper: Correctional Misconduct
Week 6: Case Study Paper: Correctional Misconduct Deliverable: Complete a three to four-page (not including Cover Page or Reference page) case study using the usual APA formatting guidelines. Your paper should have a properly APA-formatted cover page, introduction, main body (information), and conclusion. In addition, your case study should have at least three to four APA-formatted references. Have you ever heard of the escape of two maximum-security inmates from the Clinton Correctional Facility in upstate New York? This horrific event was later made into a film called Escape from Dannemora. The escape could not have occurred with the exception of assistance from prison insiders. Here is an ABC News report. Use this case as an example as you research and identify your own case that centers around what you have learned regarding correctional misconduct in your assigned reading. For this assignment, you will identify and research a case involving correctional misconduct that has taken place on U.S. soil. You may go back as far as you would like in history for this case study. Complete the following. • • • • • Locate a criminal case that involved correctional misconduct. Outline the case facts and identify the specific problem(s) that led to the correctional misconduct. What was the process involved in the finding and determination that correctional misconduct was found (i.e., witness statements, physical evidence, etc.)? What ethical theories may help to explain the misconduct? Explain. Summarize the case study and include your personal thoughts as to the process and outcome of the case. Don’t forget to submit your assignment. Rubric CRMJ425 Week 6 Rubric CRMJ425 Week 6 Rubric Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSection 1: Purpose A clear purpose is evident that specifically and fully answers the question and demonstrates knowledge of the subject matter. Vocabulary is reflective of weekly topics discussed. This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSection 2: Organization and Support: Part 1: Locate a criminal case that involved correctional misconduct. Outline the case facts and identify the specific problem(s) that led to the correctional misconduct Ratings Pts 10 to >9.0 pts Excellent The thesis is well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. 9 to >8.0 pts Competent The issue is fairly clear to the reader. The thesis statement provides a decent sense of what will be addressed, but may be slightly unclear, or lacking in insight or originality. 8 to >7.0 pts Fair The issue is somewhat vague, the central idea is not clear. The title and thesis do not connect well or the title is unimaginative. 7 to >6.0 pts Poor The reader cannot determine the issue addressed. Difficult to identify the central idea. 6 to >0 pts Unacceptable The submission does not meet this requirement. 10 to >9.0 pts Excellent The student located a case, outlined the case facts, and identified the specific problem(s) that led to the correctional misconduct. The overall response is organized, focused, and detailed. 9 to >8.0 pts Competent The student located a case, outlined the case facts, and identified the specific problem(s) that led to the correctional misconduct. The response is organized and focused. 8 to >7.0 pts Fair The student located a case, outlined the case facts, and identified the specific problem(s) that led to the correctional misconduct. The response is somewhat organized but lacks focus and detail. 7 to >6.0 pts Poor The student located a case, outlined the case facts, and identified the specific problem(s) that led to the correctional misconduct. The response lacks organization, focus, and detail. 6 to >0 pts Unacceptable The submission does not meet this requirement. 10 pts 10 pts CRMJ425 Week 6 Rubric Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSection 2: Organization and Support: Part 2: What was the process involved in the finding and determination that correctional misconduct was found (i.e., witness statements, physical evidence, etc.)? This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSection 2: Organization and Support: Part 3: What ethical theories may help to explain the misconduct? Explain This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSection 2: Organization and Support: Part 4: Summarize the case study and include your personal thoughts as to the process and outcome of the case Ratings Pts 20 to >18.0 pts Excellent The response is well organized, focused, and includes ample evidence to support the overall purpose. 18 to >16.0 pts Competent The response is organized, focused, and includes some evidence to support the overall purpose. 16 to >14.0 pts Fair The response is somewhat organized and includes some evidence to support the overall purpose. 14 to >12.0 pts Poor The response lacks organization and evidence to support the overall purpose. 12 to >0 pts Unacceptable The submission does not meet this requirement. 20 to >18.0 pts Excellent The student identified, summarized, and discussed one or more ethical theories that they could relate to the cause of the correctional misconduct. The response is well organized, focused, and includes ample evidence to support the overall purpose. 18 to >16.0 pts Competent The student identified, summarized, and discussed one or more ethical theories that they could relate to the cause of the correctional misconduct. The response is organized, focused, and includes some evidence to support the overall purpose. 16 to >14.0 pts Fair The student identified, summarized, and discussed one or more ethical theories that they could relate to the cause of the correctional misconduct. The response is somewhat organized and includes some evidence to support the overall purpose. 14 to >12.0 pts Poor The student failed to summarize and discuss one or more ethical theories that they could relate to the cause of the correctional misconduct. The response lacks organization and evidence to support the overall purpose. 12 to >0 pts Unacceptable The submission does not meet this requirement. 20 to >18.0 pts Excellent The student summarized the case study and included their personal thoughts as to the process and outcome of the case. The response is well organized, focused, and includes ample evidence to support the overall purpose. 18 to >16.0 pts Competent The student summarized the case study and included their personal thoughts as to the process and outcome of the case. The response is organized, focused, and includes some evidence to support the overall purpose. 16 to >14.0 pts Fair The student summarized the case study and included their personal thoughts as to the process and outcome of the case. The response is fairly organized but is lacking evidence to support the overall purpose. 14 to >12.0 pts Poor The student fails to either summarize the case study or included their personal thoughts as to the process and outcome of the case. The response lacks organization and evidence to support the overall purpose. 12 to >0 pts Unacceptable The submission does not meet this requirement. 20 pts 20 pts 20 pts CRMJ425 Week 6 Rubric Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA The submission includes in-text citations and a full reference page formatted correctly. This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics The student complies with all assignment requirements and includes the required sections. Rules of grammar, usage and punctuation are followed. The spelling is correct. Sentences are wellconstructed, with consistently strong, varied sentences. Total Points: 100 Ratings 10 to >9.0 pts Excellent No errors in APA Style (citations and references). The student includes at least three academic resources (ideally one for each section). 9 to >8.0 pts Competent A few errors in APA Style (citations and references) that do not detract from the essay. The student includes at least three academic resources (ideally, one for each section). 10 to >9.0 pts Excellent Correct use of punctuation, no run-on sentences, minimal to no spelling errors. Conforms in every way to format requirements. 9 to >8.0 pts Competent Sentence structure and grammar are strong despite occasional transgressions. Some (minor) spelling errors; may have one run-on sentence. Conforms in every way to format requirements. Pts 8 to >7.0 pts Fair Multiple, noticeable errors in APA Style (citations and references) that detract from the essay or the student fails to use at least three academic resources. 7 to >6.0 pts Poor Significant errors in APA Style (citations and references) that detract from the essay and/or missing resources. 6 to >0 pts Unacceptable The submission does not meet this requirement. 8 to >7.0 pts Fair There are problems in sentence structure and grammar and some errors in punctuation and spelling. May have some run-on sentences. Conforms in almost every way to format requirements. 7 to >6.0 pts Poor Frequent major errors in punctuation and spelling. Many spelling and grammar errors, use of incomplete sentences, inadequate proofreading. Does not conform to format requirements. 6 to >0 pts Unacceptable The submission does not meet this requirement. 10 pts 10 pts
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
