Research Paper Instructions A list of research articles from leading academic journals is provided in Canvas. Select and carefully
Research Paper Instructions
A list of research articles from leading academic journals is provided in Canvas. Select and carefully read 3 articles from this list based on the topics that sound most interesting to you.
For each article, you will write a two-page summary (for a total of 6 pages). Each summary should include the following information, with headings for each section. Reports not in your own words will be considered plagiarized and will not be counted for credit. Canvas uses plagiarism detection software (TurnItIn) that can detect content copied from the internet or past student papers.
For each article, you need to provide the following (in your own words) and include headings for each section:
Citation: The citation information for the article, following MLA or APA guidelines,
Research Question: a description of the purpose of the study/research question under investigation,
Background: a brief discussion of some of the background studies presented in the article’s introduction,
Method: a clear description of the methodology used,
Results: a 1 paragraph summary of what the authors found
Conclusions: the conclusions that the author(s) drew about the findings, and, finally,
Concept and Evaluation: 1-2 paragraphs identifying the course concept(s) to which the article relates and your own reactions and evaluation of the research reported in the article.
VERY IMPORTANT: PLEASE PUT FULL NAME, MGT 300 SECTION NUMBER and TIME; AND STUDENT ID AT BEGINNING OF THIS WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT.
This is an individual assignment and you should submit your own individual work.
The paper should follow these guidelines: six pages total, two-pages per article, typed, double-spaced, 12pt font and 1 inch margins. All writing is to be characterized by proper spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language.
This assignment is due by 9 pm on Friday 11/17/23 (AZ TIME). If you elect to complete this option, please submit your completed paper as a Word document via Canvas. Do not submit your paper in another format such as via Google drive or as a link to a Google document. Credit will be assigned on a yes/no basis. Late papers will not be accepted and partial credit will not be awarded.
Research Articles (select 3 articles total for your paper)
Academy of Management Journal:
Harrison, D. A., Newman, D. A., & Roth, P. L. (2006). How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Academy of Management Journal 49: 305-325.i
LePine, J. A., Podsakoff, N.P., & LePine, M.A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor- hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal 48: 764-775.
Rich, B. L., LePine, J. A., & Crawford, E. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal 53: 617-635.
Kilduff, G. J., Elfenbein, H. A., & Staw, B. M. 2010. The psychology of rivalry: A relationally dependent analysis of competition. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 943-969.
Yu, T., & Cannella, A. A. 2007. Rivalry between multinational enterprises: An event history approach. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 663-684.
Administrative Science Quarterly:
Withey, M.J., & Cooper, W.H. (1989). Predicting exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect. Administrative Science Quarterly 34: 521-539.
Porac, J. F., Thomas, H., Wilson, F., Paton, D., & Kanfer, A. 1995. Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 203-227.
Rogers, K. M., Corley, K. G., & Ashforth, B. E. 2017. Seeing more than orange: Organizational respect and positive identity transformation in a prison context. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62: 219-269.
Casciaro, T., Gino, F., & Kouchaki, M. 2014. The contaminating effects of building instrumental ties: How networking can make us feel dirty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59: 705-735.
Shah, P. P., Peterson, R. S., Jones, S. L., & Ferguson, A. J. 2021. Things are not always what they seem: The origins and evolution of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66: 426-474.
Journal of Applied Psychology:
Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology 87: 66-80.
Call, M. L., Nyberg, A. J., & Thatcher, M.B. 2015. Stargazing: An integrative conceptual review, theoretical reconciliation, and extension for star employee research. Journal of Applied Psychology 100: pp. 623-640.
Kiazad, K., Holtom, B.C., Hom, P.W., & Newman, A. (2015). Job embeddedness: A multifoci theoretical extension. Journal of Applied Psychology 100: 641-659.
Pugh, S. D, Groth, M., & Henning-Thurau, T. (2011). Willing and able to fake emotions: A closer examination of the link between emotional dissonance and employee well-being. Journal of Applied Psychology 96: 377-390.
Judge, T. A., Rodell, J.B., Klinger, R.L., Simon, L.S., & Crawford, E.R. (2013). Hierarchical representations of the five-factor model of personality in predicting job performance: Integrating three organizing frameworks with two theoretical perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology 98: 875-925.
Organization Science
Denrell, J., Christina Fang, C., & Liu, C. 2014. Chance explanations in the management sciences. Organization Science 26(3), 923-940.
Argote, L., & Miron-Spektor, E. 2011. Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organization Science, 22: 1123-1137.
Eggers, J. P., & Kaplan, S. 2009. Cognition and renewal: Comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change. Organization Science, 20: 461-477.
Miller, C. C., Washburn, N. T., & Glick, W. H. 2013. The myth of firm performance. Organization Science, 24(3): 948-964.
Bednar, J. S., Galvin, B. M., Ashforth, B. E., & Hafermalz, E. 2020. Putting identification in motion: A dynamic view of organizational identification. Organization Science, 31: 200-222.
Personnel Psychology:
Tepper, B.J., Duffy, M.K., Henle, C.A., Lambert, L.S. (2006). Procedural injustice, victim precipitation, and abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology 28: 101-123.
Judge, T.A., Higgins, C.A., Thoreson, C.J., & Barrick, M.R. (1999). The big five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology 52: 621-652.
Ferris, D. L., Lian, H., Brown, D. J., Pang, F. X. J., & Keeping, L. M. (2010). Self-esteem and job performance: The moderating role of self-esteem contingencies. Personnel Psychology 63: 561-593.
Fulmer, I. S., Gerhart, B., & Scott, K. S. (2003). Are the 100 best better: An empirical investigation of the relationship between being a “Great Place to Work” and firm performance. Personnel Psychology 56: 965-993.
Chamberlin, M., Newton, D.W., & LePine, J. A. 2016. A meta-analysis of voice and its promotive and prohibitive forms: Identification of key associations, distinctions, and future research directions. Personnel Psychology 70, 11-71.
Strategic Management Journal:
D’Aveni, R. A., Dagnino, G. B., & Smith, K. G. 2010. The age of temporary advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(13): 1371-1385.
Guo, G. 2017. Demystifying variance in performance: A longitudinal multilevel perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 38: 1327-1342.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21: 1105-1121.
Feldman, E., & Montgomery, C. A. 2015. Are incentives without expertise sufficient? Evidence from Fortune 500 firms. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 113-122.
Fitza, M. A. 2014. The use of variance decomposition in the investigation of CEO effects: How large must the CEO effect be to rule out chance? Strategic Management Journal, 35: 1839-1852.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
