NRS-465 Applied Evidence-Based Project and Practicum

Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal Dissemination and Reflection – Rubric Audience 2 points Criteria Description Describe who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project. 5. Target 2 points A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is thorough. 4. Acceptable 1.78 points A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is mostly detailed. 3. Approaching 1.58 points A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is present but lacks detail. 2. Insufficient 1.5 points A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is incomplete or inaccurate. 1. Unsatisfactory Collapse All 0 points A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is missing. © 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Professional Communication 2.5 points Criteria Description Describe two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation. 5. Target 2.5 points A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is thorough. 4. Acceptable 2.23 points A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is mostly detailed. 3. Approaching 1.98 points A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is present but lacks detail. 2. Insufficient 1.88 points A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is incomplete or inaccurate. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is missing. © 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Feedback and Biases 2.5 points Criteria Description Discuss the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation. 5. Target 2.5 points A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is thorough. 4. Acceptable 2.23 points A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is mostly detailed. 3. Approaching 1.98 points A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is present but lacks detail. 2. Insufficient 1.88 points A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is incomplete or inaccurate. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is missing. © 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Interprofessional Collaboration 2 points Criteria Description Describe how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future. 5. Target 2 points A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is thorough. 4. Acceptable 1.78 points A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is mostly detailed. 3. Approaching 1.58 points A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is present but lacks detail. 2. Insufficient 1.5 points A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is incomplete or inaccurate. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is missing. © 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Mechanics of Writing 1 points Criteria Description Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc. 5. Target 1 points No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout. 4. Acceptable 0.89 points Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used. 3. Approaching 0.79 points Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted. 2. Insufficient 0.75 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout. Total 10 points © 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.