HRM in Context
Module Code Module Title Module Credits GHL5000 HRM in Context 20 Academic Year and Semester Examination Board Level & Block 2023-24, 2nd Semester July 2024 L5-B2 Method of Assessment Term Weighting WRIT1 Mid-term 50% Module Leader Module Leader email Dr. Roland Getaruelas [email protected] Additional Information (if any) Deadline of Submission: April 25, 2024 Time: 9:00 PM Version 1 Page 1 of 9 Assessment Details Assessment title Abr. Weighting HRM in Context WRIT1 50% Pass marks for undergraduate work is 40%, unless stated otherwise. Task/assessment brief: Assessment Task Answer both Task 1 and Task 2. Total assigned words is 2000. (Task 1 = 1000+ Task 2 = 1000) 1. Compare and contrast Training & Development and Learning & Development and evaluate the objectives of every theory. (1000 words) 2. Evaluate and explain the importance of each selection process listed below: (1000 words) Criteria development and application and resume review. Interviewing and test administration. 10 references Harvard style ***END OF ASSIGNMENT TASK*** Word count (or equivalent): 2000 This is a reflection of the effort required for the assessment. Word counts will normally include any text, tables, calculations, figures, subtitles and citations. Reference lists and contents of appendices are excluded from the word count. Contents of appendices are not usually considered when determining your final assessment grade. Academic or technical terms explained: Version 1 Page 2 of 9 Submission Details Submission Deadline: Mid – 25 th April 2024 After the result announcement (10 working days) – July 2024 EB Estimated Feedback Return Date Submission Time: 9:00 PM Turnitin: Any assessments submitted after the deadline will not be marked and will be recorded as a non-attempt unless you have had an extension request agreed or have approved mitigating circumstances. See the Gulf College website for more information on submission details and mitigating circumstances. File Format: The assessment must be submitted as a word document and submit through the Turnitin submission point. Your assessment should be titled with your: Student ID number, Module code and Assessment ID, e.g. 1610200 GAC3000 WRIT1 Feedback Feedback for the assessment will be provided electronically via Turnitin / MS Teams / Face to Face. Feedback will be provided with comments on your strengths and the areas which you can improve. Module tutors give students two types of assessment feedback: formative, which is given when the student is working on the completion of an assignment or coursework, and summative, which is given upon completion of the module. A comprehensive assessment feedback on your performance will be given after the announcement of the results. (10 Working Days) Assessment Criteria Learning outcomes assessed On successful completion of the module, a student should be able to: Identify and evaluate the key business issues and external environmental factors that impact upon HR strategy and activities within organisations. Examine the role of HR and the specialist professional areas within the HR function. Analyse key models, theories, and concepts of HRM and explore the contribution of HR to issues of business ethics, governance, and accountability. Consider the contribution of the HR function in identifying and responding to change in the business and external context and promoting good management practice. Version 1 Page 3 of 9 Compare and scrutinise relevant and appropriate HR data sources for the purposes of carrying out business and environment planning. In addition, the assessment will test the following learning outcome: Identify and evaluate the key business issues and external environmental factors that impact upon HR strategy and activities within organization. Examine the role of HR and the specialist professional areas within the HR function. Compare and scrutinise relevant and appropriate HR data sources for the purposes of carrying out business and environment planning. Marking/Assessment Criteria Question Marks Allocated Description Task 1. Discussions Compare and contrast Training & Development and Learning & Development. (25 marks) Evaluation the objectives of training & development and learning and development. ( 25 marks) 50 Task 2 Evaluation and explanation of the importance of criteria development and application and resume review. ( 25 marks) Evaluation and explanation of the importance of interviewing and test administration. (25 marks) TOTAL Version 1 50 100 Page 4 of 9 2023-24 Version 1 Page 5 of 9 Further Information Who can answer questions about my assessment? Questions about the assessment should be directed to the staff member who has set the task/assessment brief. This will usually be the Module tutor. They will be happy to answer any queries you have. Referencing and independent learning (Not applicable for Examination) Please ensure you reference a range of credible sources, with due attention to the academic literature in the area. The time spent on research and reading from good quality sources will be reflected in the quality of your submitted work. Remember that what you get out of university depends on what you put in. Your teaching sessions typically represent between 10% and 30% of the time you are expected to study for your degree. A 20-credit module represents 200 hours of study time. The rest of your time should be taken up by self-directed study. Unless stated otherwise you must use the HARVARD referencing system. Further guidance on referencing can be found in the on Moodle. Correct referencing is an easy way to improve your marks and essential in achieving higher grades on most assessments. Technical submission problems (Not applicable for Examination) It is strongly advised that you submit your work at least 24 hours before the deadline to allow time to resolve any last minute problems you might have. If you are having issues with IT or Turnitin you should contact the IT Helpdesk on (+968) 92841521/ 92841217. You may require evidence of the Helpdesk call if you are trying to demonstrate that a fault with Turnitin was the cause of a late submission. Mitigating circumstances Short extensions on assessment deadlines can be requested in specific circumstances. If you are encountering particular hardship which has been affecting your studies, then you may be able to apply for mitigating circumstances. This can give the teachers on your programme more scope to adapt the assessment requirements to support your needs. Mitigating circumstances policies and procedures are regularly updated. You should refer to your Academic Advisor for information on extensions and mitigating circumstances. Unfair academic practice Cardiff Met takes issues of unfair practice extremely seriously. The University has procedures and penalties for dealing with unfair academic practice. These are explained in full in the University’s Unfair Practice regulations and procedures under Volume 1, Section 8 of the Academic Handbook. The Module Leader reserves the right to interview students regarding any aspect of their work submitted for assessment. Types of Unfair Practice, include: Plagiarism, which can be defined as using without acknowledgement another person’s words or ideas and submitting them for assessment as though it were one’s own work, for instance by copying, translating from one language to another or unacknowledged paraphrasing. Further examples include: Version 1 Page 6 of 9 Use of any quotation(s) from the published or unpublished work of other persons, whether published in textbooks, articles, the Web, or in any other format, where quotations have not been clearly identified as such by being placed in quotation marks and acknowledged. Use of another person’s words or ideas that have been slightly changed or paraphrased to make it look different from the original. Summarising another person’s ideas, judgments, diagrams, figures, or computer programmes without reference to that person in the text and the source in a bibliography/reference list. Use of assessment writing services, essay banks and/or any other similar agencies (NB. Students are commonly being blackmailed after using essay mills). Use of unacknowledged material downloaded from the Internet. Re-use of one’s own material except as authorised by your degree programme. Collusion, which can be defined as when work that that has been undertaken with others is submitted and passed off as solely the work of one person. Modules will clearly identify where joint preparation and joint submission are permitted, in all other cases they are not. Fabrication of data, making false claims to have carried out experiments, observations, interviews or other forms of data collection and analysis, or acting dishonestly in any other way. How is my work graded? Gulf College uses Cardiff Metropolitan University’s Generic Band Descriptors (GBD), in conjunction with programme-specific and/or assessment-specific descriptors that are developed in accordance with the principles underpinning the generic descriptors, as a reference in marking student work outputs. This is to ensure that marking is consistent across all Cardiff Met students’ work, including the work outputs of students in Gulf College. Assessment marking undergoes a meticulous process to make sure that it is fair and truly reflects the performance of students in their modules. Marking of work at each level of Cardiff Met degree programmes are benchmarked against a set of general requirements set out in Cardiff Met’s Guidance on Assessment Marking. https://www.cardiffmet.ac.uk/registry/academichandbook/Documents/AH1_04_03.pdf To find out more about assessments and key academic skills that can have a significant impact on your marks, download and read your Module Handbook from Moodle and your Programme Handbook from the college website. Version 1 Page 7 of 9 2023-24 : ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☐ ☒ ☐ ☒ Version 1 Page 8 of 9 ☒ ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Version 1 Page 9 of 9
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
