Explore a system you regularly interact with where some type of disagreement, dysfunction, or conflict is present.

Assignment Name: DQ1: Explore a system you regularly interact with where some type of disagreement, dysfunction, or conflict is present. Identify the disagreement, dysfunction, or conflict. Then, apply one of the major theoretical perspectives to understand why the disagreement, dysfunction, or conflict began and how it persists in the system. Points: 5 Purpose: A goal of our course is to apply sociological concepts and theories to everyday life. This week, the sociological imagination was explored, as were other concepts like social structures and the major theoretical perspectives. To improve understanding on how the major theoretical perspectives in sociology can be applied, this discussion board is going to focus on applying said perspectives to social phenomena. After completing this assignment, you should be able to evaluate how the major theoretical perspectives in sociology explain the creation and maintenance of disagreement, dysfunction, and conflict in systems within society. Task: Your task is to: (1) Read Chapters 1 and 2 of our text and review Lectures 1 and 2. (2) Create an initial post of 250 words or more that discusses a system you regularly interact with where some type of disagreement, dysfunction, or conflict is present. Describe the creation and maintenance of this disagreement, dysfunction, or conflict by employing one of the major theoretical perspectives in sociology. (3) Then, return to the board. Respond to two classmates in posts of no less than 50 words that evaluate the disagreement, dysfunction, or conflict in the original post, but apply a major theoretical perspective that is different than the one used by the original poster. Criteria: Your assignment will be graded on the following criteria, 1 point for each criteria: (1) Did the initial post meet the length requirements? (2) Did the initial post accurately answer the question posed? (3) Was the major theoretical perspective applied correctly? (4) Did the responses meet the length requirements? (5) Did the responses address the original post by applying a different major theoretical perspective?