MGMT task
Chapter 14 – Gender & Leadership-Northouse-LEADERSHIP LABRYINTH Business Brief Presentation 1 based on Chapter 14 (Gender and Leadership)(APA)- “I am writing on Leadership Labyrinth” REFERENCES: Northouse, P.G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). CENGAGE. 20220404230319leadership_theory_and_practice9th_edition_peter_g_northouse_ peter.pdf MGMT-Chapter 14 – Gender & Leadership- “I am writing on- Northouse-“LEADERSHIP LABYRINTH”-(APA-FORMAT). A frequent question that I get is how long the briefing should be. If your group has 5 members or less than 5 members, the briefing is to be 5 minutes. If your group has 6 members, the briefing is to be 6 minutes. So it will be either a 5 minute presentation or a 6 minute presentation. Each member is to present for 1 minute (between 55 seconds and 1 minute and 5 seconds) Do not put your presentation on FSU sharepoint as I cannot open it and you would not send your customer a link and tell them to log into your company’s network to view the presentation. Your group may want to develop conflict resolution procedures, as well as choose a single group member to come to me with questions. Your group must prepare at least two business briefings on leadership topics drawn from Northouse’s Interactive Book on Leadership. This presentation is based on either one of the week’s assigned reading chapters. The briefing should be comprised of a presentation that is about 1 minute per person (See above bold) and has one slide per person outlining your take on the theory of leadership (with the additional cover slide and reference slides. The slides should: 1) summarize the theory. 2) explain how it adds to leadership studies 3) Discuss criticisms of the theory, 4) present some new material on the theory (last five years {the more recent the better}), and 5) provide your group’s assessment of the approach with respect to today’s workforce and current global environment (e.g. is it useful, practical, easy, dated). The briefing will be assessed using the Rubric criteria on each dimension: Accuracy – did you make an accurate summary of the theory and its critics Team – did all your group members present for at least one minute in a professional manner Presentation Quality – were the slides professional (font, size, color choices, etc) Value – did the new material extend the textbook material in a relevant and interesting way Credibility – was the group’s assessment credible Rubric Business Briefing 22 Business Briefing 22 Criteria Ratings 19 pts Pts 17 pts Superior 90- Excellent 100 pts. 15.1 pts Good 70-79 80-89 pts. pts. This criterion is linked to a A thoroughly Mostly A somewhat Learning accurate accurate accurate 19 pts 17 pts 15.1 pts 13.1 pts Fair 60-69 11.3 pts pts Poor 0-59 Not a very accurate pts. Missing the summary of summary of 19 pts OutcomeAccuracySummary summary of summary of summary of the theory the theory the theory the theory the theory of theory and critics and/or its and/or its and its critics. and its and its critics. critics. [11.4 critics. [0 to [19 to 17.1 critics. [15.2 [13.2 to 15.1 to 13.1 11.3 points] points] to 17 points]points] points] 13.1 pts 11.3 pts Superior 90- Excellent Good 70-79 Fair 60-69 Poor 0-59 100 pts. 80-89 pts. pts. pts. All of the Not all of the All of the Not all of the Not all of the group group group group group members members members members members presented presented presented presented presented for at least for at least for at least for at least for at least pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTeamProfessional presentation by group members one minute one minute one minute one minute one minute in a in a in a in a and the 19 pts Business Briefing 22 Criteria Ratings Pts professional professional somewhat professional presentation manner and manner, and professional manner, and was not no individual no manner and one or more done in a presented individuals no individual individuals professional for more presented presented presented manner. [0 than two for more for more for more to 11.3 minutes. [19 than two than two than two points] to 17.1 minutes. minutes. minutes. points] [15.2 to 17 [13.2 to 15.1 [11.4 to 13.1 points] Learning OutcomePresentation QualityProfessional looking slide deck points] 15.1 pts 13.1 pts Good 70-79 Fair 60-69 11.3 pts pts. pts Poor 0-59 The slides The slides Superior 90- Excellent were were not 100 pts. 80-89 pts. somewhat professional were not The slides The slides were very were 19 pts This criterion is linked to a points] 17 pts professional professional in terms of in terms of (font, size, (font, size, color color choices, choices, etc). [19 to etc). [15.2 to 17.1 points] 17 points] pts. The slides professional in terms of professional in terms of (font, size, in terms of (font, size, color (font, size, color choices, color choices, etc), and/or choices, etc) etc), but they they could and they could have have been were not been more engaging to more 19 pts engaging to engaging to the the the audience. [0 audience. audience. to 11.3 [13.2 to 15.1 [11.4 to 13.1 points] This criterion is linked to a 19 pts 17 pts points] points] 15.1 pts 13.1 pts 11.3 pts Superior 90- Excellent 80-Good 70-79 Fair 60-69 Poor 0-59 100 pts. 89 pts. pts. pts pts. conversation beyond the The new The new The new The new The new textbook material material material material material Learning OutcomeValueExtending the 19 pts Business Briefing 22 Criteria Ratings Pts (research) (research) (research) (research) (research) extended somewhat barely barely did not the textbook extended theextended material in a textbook extended the extend the the textbook textbook textbook relevant and material in a material in a material and material. [0 interesting relevant and relevant and it was not way. [19 to interesting interesting relevant to 11.3 points] 17.1 points] way. [15.2 to way. [13.2 to and/or 17 points] 15.1 points] interesting. [11.4 to 13.1 points] 19 pts Superior 90100 pts. This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCredibilityReliability of the group’s assessment The group’s assessment was highly credible. [19 to 17.1 points] 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAAdhere to APA guidelines for citations and references 5% 17 pts 15.1 pts Excellent Good 70-79 80-89 pts. pts. The group’s The group’s assessment assessment was was somewhat basically credible. credible. [15.2 to 17 [13.2 to 15.1 points] points] 4.4 pts 3.9 pts 13.1 pts 11.3 pts Fair 60-69 Poor 0-59 pts pts. The group’s The group’s assessment assessment 19 pts was not very was not credible. [11.4 to 13.1 to 11.3 points] 3.4 pts Superior 90- Excellent Good 70-79 Fair 60-69 100 pts. 80-89 pts. pts. pts Properly Properly Properly Properly formatted formatted formatted formatted APA style APA style APA style APA style citations and citations and citations and citations and references references references references with 0 with 1 error. with 2 credible. [0 with 3 errors. [4.5 [4 to 4.4 errors. [3.5 errors. [3 to to 5 points] points] to 3.9 points]3.4 points] points] 2.9 pts Poor 0-59 pts. Properly formatted APA style citations and references with more than 3 errors. [0 to 2.9 points] 5 pts Business Briefing 22 Criteria Total Points: 100 Ratings Pts
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
