As a?manager, you must be able to respond to the internal and external forces that can affect operational plans.?You’ll use valuable skills in?logistics and supply chain managemen
As a manager, you must be able to respond to the internal and external forces that can affect operational plans.
You’ll use valuable skills in logistics and supply chain management to gain a competitive advantage through the implementation of new strategic directions.
In this assessment, you will complete your strategic implementation plan, which demonstrates that you can integrate leadership skills to support the strategic implementation of operational plans.
Assessment Deliverable
Complete part 2 of your strategic implementation plan in 700 to 1,050 words.
Assess the leadership skills required to execute your implementation plan and identify any skill gaps that must be addressed through training and development programs. Be sure you consider cultural competence in your assessment that will foster diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging.
Select which 1 of the following generic strategies will be employed for your implementation plan and briefly explain how it will be used to gain or maximize competitive advantage:
- Overall cost leadership
- Differentiation
- Focus
Incorporate the key competitive advantages in your implementation plan. Explain how they are included in your approach.
Explain how the organizational design may change because of your implementation plan.
Create a timeline for your implementation plan and include major milestones.
Summarize how this plan is expected to achieve your strategic objectives and measurable outcomes. Include revisions to your strategic objectives and measurable outcomes, if any.
MGT/566 v2
Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
MGT/566 Grading Rubrics Wk 2 Summative Assessment: Project Management – Strategic Objectives Draft ……………………………………………………………………………………… 2
Wk 4 Summative Assessment: Human Capital Presentation …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 4 Wk 6 Summative Assessment: Strategic Implementation Plan: Part 2 …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 6
Grading Rubrics MGT/566 v2 Page 2 of 8
Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Wk 2 Summative Assessment: Project Management – Strategic Objectives Draft
Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A
Proficient 74-89% C to B+
Developing 60-73% D to C-
Needs Improvement 0-59%
F
Strategic objectives
Weight: 40%
Created clear and insightful strategic objectives from internal and external environmental scans
Created mostly clear and insightful strategic objectives from internal and external environmental scans
Created somewhat clear or somewhat insightful strategic objectives from internal and external environmental scans
Created unclear or not insightful strategic objectives from internal and external environmental scans, or strategic objectives were not evident
Measurable outcomes
Weight: 40%
Fully aligned measurable outcomes to strategic objectives
Mostly aligned measurable outcomes to strategic objectives
Somewhat aligned measurable outcomes to strategic objectives
Alignment to measurable outcomes was unclear or not evident
Management functions
Weight: 10%
Thoroughly explained how the management functions support strategic objectives
Adequately explained how the management functions support strategic objectives
Somewhat adequately explained how the management functions support strategic objectives
Inadequately explained how the management functions support strategic objectives, or explanation was not evident
Critical thinking and problem solving: Analyze Alternatives
Weight: 5%
Fully recognized a need for a solution and thoroughly explored possible solutions
Moderately recognized a need for a solution and adequately explored possible solutions
Vaguely recognized a need for a solution and narrowly explored possible solutions
Did not or inaccurately recognized a need for a solution and did not explore possible solutions/explored infeasible solutions
Grading Rubrics MGT/566 v2 Page 3 of 8
Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A
Proficient 74-89% C to B+
Developing 60-73% D to C-
Needs Improvement 0-59%
F
APA, Grammar, and Writing Mechanics
Weight: 5%
Accuracy in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice enhanced content; when applicable, attention to APA citation and formatting enhanced the content
Rare inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, word choice; when applicable, APA citation and formatting did not detract from the content
Occasional inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice; when applicable, APA citation and formatting detracted from the content
Frequent inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice; when applicable, APA formatting made the content inaccessible
Grading Rubrics MGT/566 v2 Page 4 of 8
Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Wk 4 Summative Assessment: Human Capital Presentation
Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A
Proficient 74-89% C to B+
Developing 60-73% D to C-
Needs Improvement 0-59%
F
Unique resources
Weight: 20%
Thoroughly determined the company’s unique resources and clearly described how they create competitive advantages and sustain value
Adequately determined the company’s unique resources and mostly described how they create competitive advantages and sustain value
Somewhat adequately determined the company’s unique resources and somewhat described how they create competitive advantages and sustain value
Did not adequately determine the company’s unique resources or did not clearly describe how they create competitive advantages and sustain value, or determination was not evident
Resources relationship to objectives and outcomes
Weight: 30%
Clearly and insightfully related the unique resources to the strategic objectives and how they contribute to achieving measurable outcomes
Mostly clearly and insightfully related the unique resources to the strategic objectives and how they contribute to achieving measurable outcomes
Somewhat clearly or insightfully related the unique resources to the strategic objectives and how they contribute to achieving measurable outcomes
Unclearly or not insightfully related the unique resources to the strategic objectives and how they contribute to achieving measurable outcomes, or did not relate unique resources to strategic objectives or measurable outcomes
Competitive advantages
Weight: 20%
Comprehensively explained how the company’s people, processes, markets, and technology contribute to its competitive advantages
Adequately explained how the company’s people, processes, markets, and technology contribute to its competitive advantages
Somewhat adequately explained how the company’s people, processes, markets, and technology contribute to its competitive advantages
Inadequately explained, or did not explain, how the company’s people, processes, markets, and technology contribute to its competitive advantages
Grading Rubrics MGT/566 v2 Page 5 of 8
Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A
Proficient 74-89% C to B+
Developing 60-73% D to C-
Needs Improvement 0-59%
F
Internal weaknesses
Weight: 20%
Clearly identified any weaknesses in the company’s internal environment
Mostly identified any weaknesses in the company’s internal environment
Somewhat identified any weaknesses in the company’s internal environment
Unclearly identified, or did not identify, any weaknesses in the company’s internal environment
Collaboration: Results Focused
Weight: 5%
Demonstrated a distinguished ability to remain goal focused when obstacles and challenges arise to achieve results
Demonstrated a proficient ability to remain goal focused when obstacles and challenges arise to achieve results
Demonstrated a marginal ability to remain goal focused when obstacles and challenges arise to achieve results
Did not demonstrate the ability to remain goal focused when obstacles and challenges arise to achieve results
APA, Grammar, and Writing Mechanics
Weight: 5%
Accuracy in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice enhanced content; when applicable, attention to APA citation and formatting enhanced the content
Rare inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, word choice; when applicable, APA citation and formatting did not detract from the content
Occasional inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice; when applicable, APA citation and formatting detracted from the content
Frequent inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice; when applicable, APA formatting made the content inaccessible
Grading Rubrics MGT/566 v2 Page 6 of 8
Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Wk 6 Summative Assessment: Strategic Implementation Plan: Part 2
Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A
Proficient 74-89% C to B+
Developing 60-73% D to C-
Needs Improvement 0-59%
F
Leadership skills
Weight: 25%
Thoroughly assessed the leadership skills needed to implement the plans and skills gaps that must be addressed through training and development
Adequately assessed the leadership skills needed to implement the plans and skills gaps that must be addressed through training and development
Somewhat adequately assessed the leadership skills needed to implement the plans and skills gaps that must be addressed through training and development
Did not adequately assess the leadership skills needed to implement the plans and skills gaps that must be addressed through training and development, or assessment was not evident
Strategy and competitive advantages
Weight: 15%
Clearly and insightfully explained how the generic strategy selected will gain or maximize competitive advantages and how key competitive advantages are incorporated in the plan
Mostly clearly and insightfully explained how the generic strategy selected will gain or maximize competitive advantages and how key competitive advantages are incorporated in the plan
Somewhat clearly, with some insight, explained how the generic strategy selected will gain or maximize competitive advantages and how key competitive advantages are incorporated in the plan
Unclearly or with little insight explained how the generic strategy selected will gain or maximize competitive advantages and how key competitive advantages are incorporated in the plan, or explanation was not evident
Organizational design
Weight: 10%
Clearly explained how the organizational design may change because of the implementation plan
Mostly explained how the organizational design may change because of the implementation plan
Somewhat explained how the organizational design may change because of the implementation plan
Unclearly explained how the organizational design may change because of the implementation plan, or explanation was not evident
Grading Rubrics MGT/566 v2 Page 7 of 8
Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A
Proficient 74-89% C to B+
Developing 60-73% D to C-
Needs Improvement 0-59%
F
Timeline and milestones
Weight: 20%
Thoroughly developed timeline for the implementation plan and included major milestones
Mostly thoroughly developed timeline for the implementation plan and included major milestones
Somewhat thoroughly developed timeline for the implementation plan and included major milestones
Limitedly detailed timeline for the implementation plan and included major milestones, or timeline with milestones was not evident
Strategic objectives and measurable outcomes
Weight: 20%
Thoroughly summarized how the implementation plan is expected to achieve the finalized strategic objectives and measurable outcomes, noting any changes to the strategic objectives
Mostly summarized how the implementation plan is expected to achieve the finalized strategic objectives and measurable outcomes, noting any changes to the strategic objectives
Somewhat summarized how the implementation plan is expected to achieve the finalized strategic objectives and measurable outcomes, noting any changes to the strategic objectives
Vaguely or poorly summarized how the implementation plan is expected to achieve the finalized strategic objectives and measurable outcomes, noting any changes to the strategic objectives, or summary was not evident
Cultural competence and ethics: Strategic Efforts Toward Inclusion and Equity
Weight: 5%
Thoughtfully engaged in overt and deliberate planning, ethical actions, and collaborations that support diversity and foster inclusion and equity
Moderately engaged in overt and deliberate planning, ethical actions, and collaborations that support diversity and foster inclusion and equity
Narrowly engaged in overt and deliberate planning, ethical actions, and collaborations that support diversity and foster inclusion and equity
Did not engage in overt and deliberate planning, ethical actions, or collaborations that support diversity and foster inclusion and equity
Grading Rubrics MGT/566 v2 Page 8 of 8
Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A
Proficient 74-89% C to B+
Developing 60-73% D to C-
Needs Improvement 0-59%
F
APA, Grammar, and Writing Mechanics
Weight: 5%
Accuracy in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice enhanced content; when applicable, attention to APA citation and formatting enhanced the content
Rare inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, word choice; when applicable, APA citation and formatting did not detract from the content
Occasional inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice; when applicable, APA citation and formatting detracted from the content
Frequent inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice; when applicable, APA formatting made the content inaccessible
- MGT/566 Grading Rubrics
- Wk 2 Summative Assessment: Project Management – Strategic Objectives Draft
- Wk 4 Summative Assessment: Human Capital Presentation
- Wk 6 Summative Assessment: Strategic Implementation Plan: Part 2
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
