Present and explain the consequence argument in numbered premise form

Instruction for Assignment F1210

Write a 1300-1500 word paper in response to the prompt below. Must follow structure below

You must put the Consequence Argument into numbered premise form.

· Your paper must contain sections with section titles. Your first section will be your introduction. In section two, you will present and explain the consequence argument. In section three, you will present and explain the compatibilist’s objection to the argument. In section four you will present McKenna’s example and explain whether it’s a good counterexample. 

· Use footnotes

· You must include a works cited page.

Prompt A: Present and explain the consequence argument in numbered premise form. Explain how compatibilists, according to Kane, reject the validity of the consequence argument. And explain Michael McKenna’s response to the compatibilist’s objection. Is McKenna’s example a good counterexample to the compatibilists’ hypothetical analysis of “can”? Explain your answer.