Since teachers of ELLs are responsible for providing language and content instruction and assessing them both, it is important that teachers utilize and differentiate research-based instru
Assessment Description
Since teachers of ELLs are responsible for providing language and content instruction and assessing them both, it is important that teachers utilize and differentiate research-based instructional and assessment strategies so that student progress is monitored. While there is an emphasis on differentiated instructional strategies, often differentiated assessments are not emphasized. Just as students learn in different ways, they also demonstrate their knowledge and understanding in different ways.
You have been asked by your principal to create a 45-minute interactive professional development presentation for teachers working in ELL/bilingual instructional settings.
Create a 10-12 slide digital presentation providing strategies for differentiated instruction and assessments that support ELLs’ language learning and content knowledge. Include the following in your presentation:
- How to use outcomes from a variety of assessment types for assessing ELLs to guide language and content instruction. In addition to classroom-based assessments, include an explanation of how assessment results from English language proficiency assessments and standardized tests can guide instruction.
- Two examples of differentiated instruction for each language domain (listening, speaking, reading, and writing). Include why they are effective according to research.
- Four differentiated instructional strategies teachers can utilize in content areas. Include why they are effective according to research.
- Four formative assessment strategies for language development which can be differentiated for ELLs and used for monitoring student growth and the planning of future differentiated learning experiences. Include why they are effective according to research.
- Four formative assessment strategies for content knowledge which can be differentiated for ELLs and used for monitoring student growth and the planning of future differentiated learning experiences. Include why they are effective according to research.
Support your presentation with a minimum of five scholarly resources.
Presenter’s notes are required for each content slide. Presentation must include a title slide at the beginning, and a reference slide with documentation of resources at the end. The title slide and reference slide are not included in the total number of slides.
Include graphics that are relevant to the content, visually appealing, and use space appropriately.
Utilizing Assessment and Instructional Strategies for Language and Content Instruction – Rubric
Assessment Outcomes and Results 9.6 points
Criteria Description
Assessment Outcomes and Results
5. Target 9.6 points
How to use outcomes from a variety of assessment types for assessing ELLs to guide language and content instruction is
convincing. An explanation of how assessment results from English language proficiency assessments and standardized
tests can guide instruction is in-depth.
4. Acceptable 8.35 points
How to use outcomes from a variety of assessment types for assessing ELLs to guide language and content instruction is
credible. An explanation of how assessment results from English language proficiency assessments and standardized tests
can guide instruction is detailed.
3. Approaching 7.1 points
How to use outcomes from a variety of assessment types for assessing ELLs to guide language and content instruction is
overly simplistic. An explanation of how assessment results from English language proficiency assessments and
standardized tests can guide instruction is lacking detail or minimally included.
2. Insufficient 6.62 points
How to use outcomes from a variety of assessment types for assessing ELLs to guide language and content instruction is
unfitting. An explanation of how assessment results from English language proficiency assessments and standardized tests
can guide instruction is unconvincing or not included.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
Collapse All
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Di�erentiated Instruction for Language Domains 9.6 points
Criteria Description
Differentiated Instruction for Language Domains
5. Target 9.6 points
Provides compelling examples of differentiated instruction for each language domain. Convincingly includes why they are
effective according to research.
4. Acceptable 8.35 points
Provides noteworthy examples of differentiated instruction for each language domain. Reasonably includes why they are
effective according to research.
3. Approaching 7.1 points
Provides weak examples of differentiated instruction for each language domain. Vaguely includes why they are effective
according to research.
2. Insufficient 6.62 points
Provides flawed examples of differentiated instruction for each language domain. Unconvincingly includes why they are
effective according to research.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Di�erentiated Instructional Strategies for Content Areas 9.6 points
Criteria Description
Differentiated Instructional Strategies for Content Areas
5. Target 9.6 points
Provides compelling differentiated instructional strategies teachers can utilize in content areas. Convincingly includes why
they are effective according to research.
4. Acceptable 8.35 points
Provides noteworthy differentiated instructional strategies teachers can utilize in content areas. Reasonably includes why
they are effective according to research.
3. Approaching 7.1 points
Provides weak differentiated instructional strategies teachers can utilize in content areas. Vaguely includes why they are
effective according to research.
2. Insufficient 6.62 points
Provides flawed differentiated instructional strategies teachers can utilize in content areas. Unconvincingly includes why
they are effective according to research.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
