History 301
About the Assignment There are many ways that a historian can understand and record a topic in history. In chapter two, you’ve learned that there are three meta-disciplines for historiography: traditionalist, revisionist, and post-revisionist. For this assignment, you will choose one of the following topics to show your understanding of these three styles. Choose one of the following three topics in history: • • • The Women’s Suffrage Movement The Holocaust Manifest Destiny Your task is to write about your chosen topic as if you were a traditionalist, revisionist, and post-revisionist historian. Step into the shoes of each of these types of historians and demonstrate how they would understand and record your topic in history. In addition, you should write an evaluation of the approaches you’ve written to highlight the limitations and strengths of each meta-discipline. See next section for specific formatting instructions. Please read the next section carefully. Formatting & Sources In a single document, write three accounts of your historical topic as if you were a traditionalist, revisionist, and post-revisionist historian. Each account should be 250-500 words long and must include at least one primary or secondary source. Your last section should evaluate each of your accounts to highlight the strengths and limitations of each meta-discipline. In total, your essay should be 1,000 to 2,000 words. See the table below. Section Word Length Traditionalist Approach 250 to 500 words Revisionist Approach 250 to 500 words Post-Revisionist Approach 250 to 500 words Evaluation 250 to 500 words Total 1000 to 2000 words Please write your paper in the Chicago Manual of Style (CMS) format. If you’re unsure about how to use CMS format for your paper and sources, please see the following lessons: • • What Is the Chicago Citation Style? Chicago Formatting: Style & Definition For each account, you must include at least one external primary source in each of your accounts. As part of your research, you may refer to the course material for supporting evidence, but you must cite them using CMS format as well. If you use any Study.com lessons as sources, please also cite them in CMS (including the lesson title and instructor’s name). Grading Rubric Your essay will be graded based on the following rubric: Needs Improvement (2-3) Good (4) Excellent (5) Total Possible Points Student explains how a traditionalist Traditionalist would Account (x1) approach their chosen historical topic Student demonstrates how a traditionalist would approach their chosen historical topic but does not expose any strengths and/or weaknesses of this approach Student demonstrates how a traditionalist would approach their chosen historical topic and exposes some strengths and weaknesses of this approach Student demonstrates how a traditionalist would approach their chosen historical topic and exposes most strengths and weaknesses of this approach 5 Revisionist Account (x1) Student explains how a revisionist would approach their chosen historical topic Student demonstrates how a revisionist would approach their chosen historical topic but does not expose any strengths and/or weaknesses of this approach Student demonstrates how a revisionist would approach their chosen historical topic and exposes some strengths and weaknesses of this approach Student demonstrates how a revisionist would approach their chosen historical topic and exposes most strengths and weaknesses of this approach 5 PostRevisionist Account (x1) Student explains how a post-revisionist would approach their Student demonstrates how a postrevisionist would approach Student demonstrates how a postrevisionist would Student demonstrates how a postrevisionist would 5 Category Unacceptable (0-1) chosen historical topic Evaluation & Research (x1) Student only summarizes their historical accounts; All accounts missing an external primary source and/or are not in CMS formatting their chosen historical topic but does not expose any strengths and/or weaknesses of this approach approach their chosen historical topic and exposes some strengths and weaknesses of this approach approach their chosen historical topic and exposes most strengths and weaknesses of this approach Student evaluates their historical accounts without mention of their metadisciplinary strengths and weaknesses; Two accounts missing an external primary source and/or are not in CMS formatting Student evaluates their historical accounts but misses some of the strengths and limitations of each metadiscipline; One account missing an external primary source and/or are not in CMS formatting Student evaluates all three historical accounts to showcase the strengths and limitations of 5 each metadiscipline; All accounts have an external primary source and are in CMS formatting
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
