MHACB 515 : Scanning the Health Sector as an Industry Expert

MHACB/515 Competency 3 Assessment and Rubric Course Title: Scanning the Health Sector as an Industry Expert Competency Assessment Title: Business Proposal for Change Assignment Directions Select a health care facility or service at which you work or with which you are familiar. Design a 1,050- to 1,400-word Business Proposal for a process improvement or cultural change that would affect all levels of staff in the organization and improve productivity within the organization. Obtain faculty approval for your proposal topic. Include the following in your Business Proposal for Change: • • • • • • • Purpose of the change proposal Analysis of the need for change (why) Review of the current literature supporting the change from a minimum of 3 reputable sources (e.g., trade or industry publications, government or agency websites, scholarly works, or other sources of similar quality) Financial analysis of the change to include the following: o Potential costs for the change: ▪ Supplies ▪ Space ▪ Staff ▪ Time (i.e., participation time and/or facilitation time) o Actual costs may or may not be included; however, the analysis must portray specific costs that should be considered within the context of the proposal. Risks vs. benefits: o Impact on operations Implementation plan related to proposed change: o How will you measure outcomes and the success of the implementation and change? Communication plan to organization Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved. MHACB/515 Competency 3 Rubric Page 2 of 4 • • • Evaluation strategies: o How will you measure the success of the change? Exit strategy: o What is your exit strategy (if the proposal fails)? Conclusion Submit your assignment. Resources • • • Center for Writing Excellence Reference and Citation Generator Grammar Assistance Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved. MHACB/515 Competency 3 Rubric Page 3 of 4 Competency Assessment Rubric Assignment/Performance Criteria Mastery 100% Meets Expectations 85% Not Met 0% 1. Purpose and Analysis (weight 15%) The proposal clearly described the purpose of the change and an analysis of the need for the change. The proposal somewhat described the purpose of the change and an analysis of the need for the change. The proposal did not describe the purpose of the change and an analysis of the need for the change. 2. Literature Review (weight 10%) The proposal comprehensively related the current literature supporting the change from a minimum of 3 reputable sources. The proposal adequately related the current literature supporting the change from less than 3 reputable sources. The proposal did not relate the current literature supporting the change. 3. Financial Analysis (weight 15%) The proposal thoroughly analyzed specific costs within context, including costs for the change such as those for supplies, space, staff, and time. The proposal sufficiently analyzed specific costs within context, including costs for the change such as those for supplies, space, staff, and time. The proposal did not analyze specific costs within context, including costs for the change such as those for supplies, space, staff, and time. 4. Risks vs. Benefits (weight 10%) The proposal fully identified the risks and benefits of the change and their impact on operations. The proposal partially identified the risks and benefits of the change and their impact on operations. The proposal did not identify the risks and benefits of the change and their impact on operations. 5. Implementation Plan (weight 15%) The proposal astutely explained how outcomes and the success of implementation and change will be measured. The proposal acceptably explained how outcomes and the success of implementation and change will be measured. The proposal did not explain how outcomes and the success of implementation and change will be measured. 6. Communication Plan (weight 10%) The proposal fully described the communication plan to the organization. The proposal mostly described the communication plan to the organization. The proposal did not describe the communication plan to the organization. 7. Evaluation Strategies (weight 10%) The proposal comprehensively explained how the success of the change will be measured. The proposal sufficiently explained how the success of the change will be measured. The proposal did not explain how the success of the change will be measured. 8. Exit Strategy and Conclusion (weight 10%) The proposal insightfully described the exit strategy should the proposal fail and included a clear conclusion to the proposal. The proposal adequately described the exit strategy should the proposal fail and included a somewhat clear conclusion to the proposal. The proposal did not describe the exit strategy should the proposal fail and did not include a conclusion to the proposal. Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved. MHACB/515 Competency 3 Rubric Page 4 of 4 Assignment/Performance Criteria 9. Grammar and Writing Mechanics (weight 5%) Mastery 100% Accuracy in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice enhanced content. Meets Expectations 85% Rare inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice did not detract from the content. Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved. Not Met 0% Occasional or frequent inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice detracted from the content.