In this exercise, study using a MindMap Template to gauge your understanding of this week’s content. Select one of the possible topics provided to complete your MindMap Template.

  

In this exercise, study using a MindMap Template to gauge your understanding of this week’s content. Select one of the possible topics provided to complete your MindMap Template.

· myocardial infarction

· endocarditis

· myocarditis

· valvular disorders

· lipid panels

· coagulation

· clotting cascade

· deep vein thrombosis

· hypertension

heart failure 

Concept Map Template

Primary Diagnosis: ___________________________________________________________

1. Describe the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in your own words. What are the patient’s risk factors for this diagnosis?

Pathophysiology of Primary Diagnosis

Causes

Risk Factors (genetic/ethnic/physical)

2. What are the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis? How does the diagnosis impact other body systems and what are the possible complications?

Signs and Symptoms – Common presentation

How does the diagnosis impact each body system? Complications?

3. What are other potential diagnosis that present in a similar way to this diagnosis (differentials)?

4. What diagnostic tests or labs would you order to rule out the differentials for this patient or confirm the primary diagnosis?

5. What treatment options would you consider? Include possible referrals and medications.

CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS

In this exercise, you will complete a MindMap Template to gauge your understanding of this week’s content. Select one of the possible topics provided to complete your MindMap Template.

· myocardial infarction

· endocarditis

· myocarditis

· valvular disorders

· lipid panels

· coagulation

· clotting cascade

· deep vein thrombosis

· hypertension

· heart failure

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 

WEEKLY RESOURCES

: These readings are intended to serve as supplementary to the Lecturio content provided in this course. Please refer/review these supplementary resources should you need help in reinforcing concepts and in preparation for completing this week’s Assessments.

· McCance, K. L. & Huether, S. E. (2019).  Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier.

· Chapter 32: Structure and Function of the Cardiovascular and Lymphatic Systems; Summary Review

· Chapter 33: Alterations of Cardiovascular Function (stop at Dysrhythmias); Summary Review

· Chapter 35: Structure and Function of the Pulmonary System; Summary Review 

· Chapter 36: Alterations of Pulmonary Function (stop at Disorders of the chest wall and pleura); (obstructive pulmonary diseases) (stop at Pulmonary artery  hypertension); Summary Review

· Inamdar, A. A. & Inamdar, A. C. (2016).  Heart failure: Diagnosis, management, and utilizationLinks to an external site. , 5(7). doi:10.3390/jcm5070062

NURS_6501_Week 3, 5, 7, 9_Mind Map Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6501_Week 3, 5, 7, 9_Mind Map Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelect one of the possible topics provided and complete the MindMap Template.

1) Describe the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in your own words. What are the patient’s risk factors for this diagnosis?

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

A thoroughly completed MindMap Template with a selected topic was submitted. The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in the student's own words. The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail the patient's risk factors for this diagnosis.

17 to >14.0 pts

Good

A completed MindMap Template with a selected topic was submitted. The response describes the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in the student's own words. The response explains the patient's risk factors for this diagnosis.

14 to >12.0 pts

Fair

An inaccurately complete or vague MindMap Template with a selected topic was submitted. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in the student's own words. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the patient's risk factors for this diagnosis.

12 to >0 pts

Poor

An incomplete MindMap Template with a selected topic was submitted, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in the student's own words, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the patient's risk factors for this diagnosis, or is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2) What are the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis? How does the diagnosis impact other body systems and what are the possible complications?

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the patient's signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications.

17 to >14.0 pts

Good

The response accurately describes the patient's signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response accurately describes how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications.

14 to >12.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the patient's signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications.

12 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the patient's signs and symptoms for this diagnosis, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes how the diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications, or is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome3) What are other potential diagnosis that present in a similar way to this diagnosis (differentials)?

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and completely describes in detail the potential diagnoses that present in a similar way to the diagnosis provided.

17 to >14.0 pts

Good

The response accurately describes the potential diagnoses that present in a similar way to the diagnosis provided.

14 to >12.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the potential diagnoses that present in a similar way to the diagnosis provided.

12 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the potential diagnoses that present in a similar way to the diagnosis provided, or is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome4) What diagnostic tests or labs would you order to rule out the differentials for this patient or confirm the primary diagnosis?

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the diagnostic tests and labs they would order to rule out the differentials for this patient, and in confirming the primary diagnosis.

17 to >14.0 pts

Good

The response accurately describes the diagnostic tests and labs they would order to rule out the differentials for this patient, and in confirming the primary diagnosis.

14 to >12.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the diagnostic tests and labs they would order to rule out the differentials for this patient, and in confirming the primary diagnosis.

12 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the diagnostic tests and labs they would order to rule out the differentials for this patient, and in confirming the primary diagnosis, or is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome5) What treatment options would you consider? Include possible referrals and medications.

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the treatment options they would consider. The response accurately and thoroughly describes potential referrals and medications.

17 to >14.0 pts

Good

The response accurately describes the treatment options they would consider. They response accurately describes potential referrals and medications.

14 to >12.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the treatment options they would consider. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes potential referrals and medications.

12 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the treatment options they would consider, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes possible referrals and medications, or is missing.

20 pts

Total Points: 100

Previous Next

Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers

Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.

Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS

Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?

Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.

We write plagiarism Free Content

Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.

Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.

Related Posts

All Rights Reserved Terms and Conditions
College pals.com Privacy Policy 2010-2018