Health promotion theory and Program evaluation model
DNP825 Topic 7 Discussions & Epidemiology Paper Part 3
DNP825 Topic 7 Discussions & Epidemiology Paper Part 3
Topic 7 Discussions
DQ 1 Provide an overview of the program evaluation model and health promotion theory you will use in your proposed community project. Explain your rationale for your choices?
DQ 2 Provide an analysis of your surveyed community and what health-related community need is present. Define the methodology of the health improvement program you will use to solve this problem also include a time line. Include any higher level of care management and policy decision that APNs who work in the community would need to be partner with either community-based consortiums or health care policy makers.
Week 7 Epidemiology Paper Part Three: Implementation and Evaluation
Details:
The Epidemiology Paper is a practice immersion assignment designed to be completed in three sections. This is part three of the assignment. Learners are required to identify theories for implementation and evaluation of prevention and health promotion activities for an at risk population.
General Guidelines:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
- This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
- Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
- This assignment requires that support your position by referencing at least six to eight scholarly resources. At least three of your supporting references must be from scholarly sources other than the assigned readings.
- You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions:
This assignment comprises the third and final part of the Epidemiology Paper. Write a 2,000-2,500 word paper that provides the following:
- Identify a public health theory you will use to support the implementation of your prevention and health promotion activities. Provide evidence that supports the use of this theory within the program you designed.
- Design evidenced-based prevention and health promotion activities that can be implemented to decrease the health risk among your previously identified population.
- Identify the evaluation program you will use to determine the efficacy of your health promotion activities and in meeting the expected outcomes.
Portfolio Practice Hours:
Practice immersion assignments are based on your current course objectives, and are intended to be application-based learning using your real-world practice setting. These assignments earn practice immersion hours, and are indicated in the assignment by a Portfolio Practice Hours statement that reminds you, the learner, to enter a corresponding case log in Typhon. Actual clock hours are entered, but the average hours associated with each practice immersion assignment is 10.
You are required to complete your assignment using real-world application. Real-world application requires the use of evidence-based data, contemporary theories, and concepts presented in the course. The culmination of your assignment must present a viable application in a current practice setting. For more information on parameters for practice immersion hours, please refer to DNP resources in the DC Network.
To earn portfolio practice hours, enter the following after the references section of your paper:
Practice Hours Completion Statement DNP-825
I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I have also tracked said practice hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor.
Epidemiology Paper Part Three: Implementation and Evaluation Rubric
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00% 2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00% 3
Satisfactory
79.00% 4
Good
87.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
5.0 %Completed Changes and Corrected Errors to Subsequent Paper, Including Transitions for a Scholarly Paper Learner did not attach previous paper and did not make changes as indicated. N/A Learner attached previous paper and has made changes as indicated. Learner needs to incorporate transitions to connect the ideas between the papers. Learner attached previous paper and has made changes as indicated. Learner needs to incorporate better transitions to connect the ideas between the papers. earner attached previous paper and has made changes as indicated. Learner has includes all necessary transitions to create a scholarly paper. DNP825 Topic 7 Discussions & Epidemiology Paper Part 3
10.0 %Six to Eight Additional Scholarly Research Sources With In-Text Citations None of the required elements (minimum of six topic-related scholarly research sources and six in-text citations) are present. Not all required elements are present. One or more elements are missing and/or included sources are not scholarly research or topic-related. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, but the source and quality of one or more references is questionable. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related and obtained from reputable professional sources. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources.
15.0 %Identifies the Public Health/Health Promotion Theory That Was Used to Develop Health Prevention and Promotion Activities. Provides Rationale for Why This Theory Was Used Paper does not identify a public health/health promotion theory to use in the development of health prevention and promotion activities. DNP825 Topic 7 Discussions & Epidemiology Paper Part 3 Paper identifies a public health/health promotion theory to use in the development of health prevention and promotion activities. Paper does not provide rationale for why the theory was used. Paper identifies a public health/health promotion theory to use in the development of health prevention and promotion activities. Rationale for why the theory was used is weak or inconclusive. Paper identifies a public health/health promotion theory to use in the development of health prevention and promotion activities. Paper provides good rationale for why the theory was used. Paper identifies a public health/health promotion theory to use in the development of health prevention and promotion activities. Paper provides strong and insightful rationale for why the theory was used.
20.0 %Provides Design and Projected Implementation of Health Prevention and Promotion Activities. Program Is Appropriate for Identified Population Paper does not provide design or projected implementation for health prevention and promotion activities; or, program is inappropriate for identified population. Paper provides basic design for health prevention and promotion activities, but does not include projections for implementation. Program does not directly relate to the identified population. Paper provides design for health prevention and promotion activities and includes an outline for projected implementation. Program is sufficient for identified population. Paper provides design for health prevention and promotion activities and includes projection for implementation. Program is appropriate for identified population. Paper provides well thought out design for health prevention and promotion activities. Projection for implementation uses foresight and includes significant detail. Program is well thought out and appropriate for identified population.
20.0 %Program Evaluation to Determine Efficacy (Aligns Public Health Components Essential to Nursing Science; Demonstrates How These Components Are Essential to Effect Improvement on Population Health) Paper does not establish alignment of public health components essential to nursing science. Attempts to align public health components essential to nursing science, but does not demonstrate how these components are essential to effect improvement on population health. Paper aligns some of the public health components essential to nursing science and generally demonstrates how these components are essential to effect improvement on population health. Paper aligns public health components essential to nursing science and demonstrates how these components are essential to effect improvement on population health. Paper establishes a clear and strong alignment of public health components essential to nursing science. DNP825 Topic 7 Discussions & Epidemiology Paper Part 3 Demonstration of how these components are essential to effect improvement on population health is insightful and well supported.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. DNP825 Topic 7 Discussions & Epidemiology Paper Part 3
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage DNP825 Topic 7 Discussions & Epidemiology Paper Part 3
Health promotion theory and Program evaluation model
Introduction
Health promotion theory is a framework that guides the design and implementation of health promotion programs. The theory includes three key components: a behavior change model, an environmental model, and a social model. The behavior change model is based on the premise that people engage in health-promoting behaviors when they believe that these behaviors will lead to positive health outcomes. The environmental model posits that the physical and social environment influence health-related behaviors. The social model suggests that social factors such as income, education, and social support play a role in health outcomes. Program evaluation is a systematic process for assessing the effectiveness of health promotion programs. Evaluation studies can provide information on program reach, feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness. Reach refers to the number of people who are exposed to the program. Feasibility refers to whether the program can be delivered as intended. Acceptability refers to whether people are willing to participate in the program. Effectiveness refers to whether the program achieves its desired outcomes.
What is health promotion theory?
Health promotion theory is a framework for understanding and predicting health outcomes. The theory posits that health outcomes are determined by a combination of individual-level factors (e.g., age, gender, genetics) and environmental factors (e.g., social, economic, and physical).
Theory can be useful in program evaluation by providing a way to conceptualize how different program elements might work together to produce desired outcomes. For example, a health promotion intervention might target both individual-level and environmental-level factors in order to achieve its goals.
Evaluators can use health promotion theory to develop hypotheses about how an intervention is likely to work and what kinds of outcomes it might achieve. These hypotheses can then be tested through data collection and analysis.
Health promotion theory is not the only framework that can be used for program evaluation; other approaches include logic models and systems thinking. However, health promotion theory offers a unique perspective on how to address complex public health problems.
The different types of health promotion theories
Health promotion theories aim to change or influence health-related behaviors. The different types of health promotion theories are:
• Psychosocial theories – These theories focus on the personal and social factors that influence health-related behaviors. Examples of psychosocial theories include Social Cognitive Theory, the Health Belief Model, and the Theory of Planned Behavior.
• Ecological theories – These theories take an ecological approach to health promotion, examining how individual behavior is influenced by the larger social and physical environment. An example of an ecological theory is the Social Ecology Model.
• Behavioral theories – These theories focus on changing health-related behaviors through techniques such as operant conditioning and classical conditioning. Examples of behavioral theories include Behavior Modification and Social Learning Theory.
Pros and cons of health promotion theory
There are several theories that guide health promotion initiatives, and each has its own advantages and disadvantages. The most commonly used theories are the Health Belief Model, the Theory of Planned Behavior, and the Transtheoretical Model of Change.
The Health Belief Model posits that people will take action to improve their health if they believe that doing so will be effective. This theory is useful in designing campaigns to promote healthy behaviors, but it does not address why people might not believe that taking action will be effective.
The Theory of Planned Behavior holds that people are more likely to engage in a behavior if they have a positive attitude toward it, perceive it to be easy to do, and see others doing it. This theory is helpful in understanding why people might or might not engage in a particular behavior, but it does not address how to change negative attitudes or perceptions.
The Transtheoretical Model of Change posits that people go through stages when changing a behavior: precontemplation (not considering changing), contemplation (considering changing), preparation (taking steps to change), action (changing the behavior), and maintenance (keeping up the new behavior). This theory is useful in understanding how to change a behavior, but it does not address why someone might be reluctant to change.
What is a program evaluation model?
A program evaluation model is a systematic process for assessing the strengths and weaknesses of a health promotion program. It begins with a needs assessment to identify the goals of the program and the target population. The next step is to develop an evaluation plan that outlines how the data will be collected and analyzed. Once the data is collected, it is then interpreted and used to make recommendations for improve the program.
The different types of program evaluation models
There are several different types of program evaluation models, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. The most common models are the before-and-after design, the pre-post design, and the post-test only design.
The before-and-after design is the simplest and most common type of evaluation. In this design, participants are measured on a outcome variable of interest at two points in time: before they receive the intervention (or start the program) and after they have completed it. This allows for a comparison of outcomes between the two groups, but does not control for any other variables that might be affecting the results.
The pre-post design is similar to the before-and-after design, but includes a control group that does not receive the intervention. This allows for a more rigorous evaluation of the program, controlling for any other variables that might be affecting the results. However, this design can be more difficult to implement in practice.
The post-test only design is the most rigorous type of evaluation, but also the most difficult to implement. In this design, participants are randomly assigned to either receive the intervention or not receive it. Outcomes are then measured for both groups at one point in time (after completion of the program). This allows for a true comparison of outcomes between the two groups, controlling for any other variables that might be affecting the results. However, this design can be difficult to implement in practice due to its need for a large sample size and strict controls.
Pros and cons of program evaluation models
When it comes to choosing a program evaluation model, there are pros and cons to consider. On the plus side, some models, like the logic model, can help you map out your program and see how all the pieces fit together. This can be helpful in terms of both developing and implementing your program. Additionally, evaluation models can provide a framework for collecting data and assessing outcomes.
On the downside, models can be limiting in terms of creativity and flexibility. They can also be time-consuming to create and implement. Additionally, not all models are well-suited for every type of program; you’ll need to choose a model that makes sense given the goals and objectives of your program.
Ultimately, the best way to choose a program evaluation model is to consult with experts in the field and try out different approaches to see what works best for you.
Conclusion
There are a variety of different health promotion theories and program evaluation models available to public health professionals. Each has its own strengths and weaknesses, so it is important to select the theory or model that best fits the needs of your particular project. With careful planning and execution, any of these theories or models can be used to effectively promote health and improve outcomes in your community.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
