DNP 825 Topic 7 Discussions GCU

DNP 825 Topic 7 Discussions GCU

DNP 825 Topic 7 DQ 1

Provide an overview of the program evaluation model and health promotion theory you will use in your proposed community project. Explain your rationale for your choices?

DNP 825 Topic 7 DQ 2

Provide an analysis of your surveyed community and what health-related community need is present. Define the methodology of the health improvement program you will use to solve this problem also include a time line. Include any higher level of care management and policy decision that APNs who work in the community would need to be partner with either community-based consortiums or health care policy makers.

DNP 825 Week 7 Epidemiology Paper Part Three: Implementation and Evaluation

Details:

The Epidemiology Paper is a practice immersion assignment designed to be completed in three sections. This is part three of the assignment. Learners are required to identify theories for implementation and evaluation of prevention and health promotion activities for an at risk population.

General Guidelines:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

• This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
• Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
• This assignment requires that support your position by referencing at least six to eight scholarly resources. At least three of your supporting references must be from scholarly sources other than the assigned readings.
• You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Directions:

This assignment comprises the third and final part of the Epidemiology Paper. Write a 2,000-2,500 word paper that provides the following:

1. Identify a public health theory you will use to support the implementation of your prevention and health promotion activities. Provide evidence that supports the use of this theory within the program you designed.
2. Design evidenced-based prevention and health promotion activities that can be implemented to decrease the health risk among your previously identified population.
3. Identify the evaluation program you will use to determine the efficacy of your health promotion activities and in meeting the expected outcomes.

Portfolio Practice Hours:

Practice immersion assignments are based on your current course objectives, and are intended to be application-based learning using your real-world practice setting. These assignments earn practice immersion hours, and are indicated in the assignment by a Portfolio Practice Hours statement that reminds you, the learner, to enter a corresponding case log in Typhon. Actual clock hours are entered, but the average hours associated with each practice immersion assignment is 10.

You are required to complete your assignment using real-world application. Real-world application requires the use of evidence-based data, contemporary theories, and concepts presented in the course. The culmination of your assignment must present a viable application in a current practice setting. For more information on parameters for practice immersion hours, please refer to DNP resources in the DC Network.

To earn portfolio practice hours, enter the following after the references section of your paper:

Practice Hours Completion Statement DNP-825

I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I have also tracked said practice hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor.

Epidemiology Paper Part Three: Implementation and Evaluation  

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00% 2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00% 3
Satisfactory
79.00% 4
Good
87.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
5.0 %Completed Changes and Corrected Errors to Subsequent Paper, Including Transitions for a Scholarly Paper Learner did not attach previous paper and did not make changes as indicated. N/A Learner attached previous paper and has made changes as indicated. Learner needs to incorporate transitions to connect the ideas between the papers. Learner attached previous paper and has made changes as indicated. Learner needs to incorporate better transitions to connect the ideas between the papers. earner attached previous paper and has made changes as indicated. Learner has includes all necessary transitions to create a scholarly paper.

10.0 %Six to Eight Additional Scholarly Research Sources With In-Text Citations None of the required elements (minimum of six topic-related scholarly research sources and six in-text citations) are present. Not all required elements are present. One or more elements are missing and/or included sources are not scholarly research or topic-related. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, but the source and quality of one or more references is questionable. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related and obtained from reputable professional sources. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources.

15.0 %Identifies the Public Health/Health Promotion Theory That Was Used to Develop Health Prevention and Promotion Activities. Provides Rationale for Why This Theory Was Used Paper does not identify a public health/health promotion theory to use in the development of health prevention and promotion activities. Paper identifies a public health/health promotion theory to use in the development of health prevention and promotion activities. Paper does not provide rationale for why the theory was used. Paper identifies a public health/health promotion theory to use in the development of health prevention and promotion activities. Rationale for why the theory was used is weak or inconclusive. Paper identifies a public health/health promotion theory to use in the development of health prevention and promotion activities. Paper provides good rationale for why the theory was used. Paper identifies a public health/health promotion theory to use in the development of health prevention and promotion activities. Paper provides strong and insightful rationale for why the theory was used.

20.0 %Provides Design and Projected Implementation of Health Prevention and Promotion Activities. Program Is Appropriate for Identified Population Paper does not provide design or projected implementation for health prevention and promotion activities; or, program is inappropriate for identified population. Paper provides basic design for health prevention and promotion activities, but does not include projections for implementation. Program does not directly relate to the identified population. Paper provides design for health prevention and promotion activities and includes an outline for projected implementation. Program is sufficient for identified population. Paper provides design for health prevention and promotion activities and includes projection for implementation. Program is appropriate for identified population. Paper provides well thought out design for health prevention and promotion activities. Projection for implementation uses foresight and includes significant detail. Program is well thought out and appropriate for identified population.

20.0 %Program Evaluation to Determine Efficacy (Aligns Public Health Components Essential to Nursing Science; Demonstrates How These Components Are Essential to Effect Improvement on Population Health) Paper does not establish alignment of public health components essential to nursing science. Attempts to align public health components essential to nursing science, but does not demonstrate how these components are essential to effect improvement on population health. Paper aligns some of the public health components essential to nursing science and generally demonstrates how these components are essential to effect improvement on population health. Paper aligns public health components essential to nursing science and demonstrates how these components are essential to effect improvement on population health. Paper establishes a clear and strong alignment of public health components essential to nursing science. Demonstration of how these components are essential to effect improvement on population health is insightful and well supported.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness  DNP 825 Topic 7 Discussions GCU
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.

10.0 %Format
5.0 %Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage

SAMPLE ANSWER

Epidemiology Paper: Implementation and Evaluation

Introduction

epidemiology is the study and analysis of the patterns, causes, and effects of health and disease conditions in defined populations. It is a cornerstone of public health, and informs policy decisions and evidence-based clinical practice by identifying risk factors for disease and targets for preventive healthcare. Evaluating the impact of interventions on population health is a central concern of epidemiology. In this blog post, we will discuss the implementation and evaluation of one such intervention: a school-based program to reduce obesity among children. We will also touch on some of the challenges faced when trying to implement and evaluate public health interventions.

What is Epidemiology?

Epidemiology is the study and analysis of the distribution (who, when, and where), patterns (risk factors), and determinants of health and disease conditions in defined populations. It is a core science that informs public health decision-making to improve population health. Through the use of epidemiological tools, we can identify risk factors for disease, design and evaluate prevention and control strategies, set priorities, allocate resources, and monitor health status.

The Process of Epidemiology

Epidemiology is the study of disease in populations. It is a vital tool for understanding the distribution and determinants of health and disease, and for developing strategies to prevent and control health problems.

The process of epidemiology involves four main steps:

1. Defining the problem
2. Identifying the risk factors
3. Collecting data
4. Analyzing the data

1. Defining the problem: The first step in epidemiology is to define the problem. This involves identifying the health condition or disease of interest, as well as its cause(s). For example, if we wanted to study the spread of influenza, we would need to first identify the virus that causes it.

2. Identifying the risk factors: Once the cause of a health condition or disease has been identified, epidemiologists work to identify its risk factors. Risk factors are anything that increases a person’s chance of developing a certain health condition or disease. For example, some risk factors for influenza include age, contact with someone who is infected, and travel to an area where the virus is circulating.

3. Collecting data: The next step is to collect data on cases of the health condition or disease of interest. This data can be collected through medical records, surveys, interviews, or other methods. For our example of influenza, we might collect data on how many people in a community have come down with the flu over a period of time.

The different types of Epidemiology

There are four main types of epidemiology: observational, experimental, clinical, and population.

Observational epidemiology is the study of health in populations without manipulating exposure or outcomes. This type of epidemiology can be further divided into descriptive and analytic studies. Descriptive studies simply describe the distribution of a disease or health condition in a population. Analytic studies go a step further by trying to identify risk factors for a disease or health condition.

Experimental epidemiology is the study of health in populations by manipulating exposure to certain conditions. This type of epidemiology is also known as intervention epidemiology. Clinical epidemiology is the study of health in populations using medical records and other data sources. Population epidemiology is the study of health in populations using large data sets, such as national surveys.

The Benefits of Epidemiology

Epidemiology is the study of the distribution and determinants of health-related states or events (including disease), and the application of this knowledge to control health problems.

There are many benefits to epidemiology, including:

1) Improving our understanding of how diseases develop and spread. This knowledge can be used to develop new ways to prevent or treat diseases.
2) Identifying risk factors for disease. This information can be used to develop public health campaigns to raise awareness about how to reduce the risk of developing certain diseases.
3) Monitoring the spread of diseases. This information can be used to help contain and manage outbreaks of infectious diseases.
4) Evaluating the effectiveness of preventive measures and treatments. This information can be used to improve existing disease prevention and treatment strategies.

How to Implement and Evaluate an Epidemiology Paper

When it comes to writing an epidemiology paper, implementation and evaluation are key. Here are a few tips on how to get started:

1. Choose a topic that interests you. This will make the research and writing process more enjoyable and productive.

2. Do your research. Be sure to consult reliable sources in order to gather accurate information.

3. Organize your thoughts and ideas. This will make it easier to write a coherent paper.

4. Write a first draft. Don’t worry about making it perfect at this stage; just focus on getting your thoughts down on paper.

5. Edit and revise your paper. Pay attention to grammar, punctuation, and clarity.

6. After you’re satisfied with your final draft, submit it for feedback from peers or professionals in the field of epidemiology.

Conclusion

The implementation and evaluation of epidemiological paper is crucial in order to obtain accurate results. In this process, different factors must be taken into account such as the type of study, the population size and the geographical area. All these elements will help to determine the most adequate methodology to be used.