DNP 825 Topic 3 Discussions & Epidemiology Paper Part Two

DNP 825 Topic 3 Discussions & Epidemiology Paper Part Two

Topic 3 Discussions

DQ 1 Provide examples of measures that APNs can collaborate with direct care nurses in implementing evidence-based changes to improve health literacy in practice.

DQ 2 Describe an example where a patient’s culture could impact health literacy. What measures would you employ to address the health literacy barrier? How effective is the current protocol for implementing practice changes in your institution? Examine any barriers and the facilitators for implementing an evidence-based change in your specific setting?

Week 3 Epidemiology Paper Part Two – Analysis and Application

Details:

The Epidemiology Paper is a practice immersion assignment designed to be completed in three sections. This is part two of the assignment. Learners are required to identify an at-risk population, how the health risk for this population can be affected by nursing science, and the potential obstacles that may hinder implementation of health prevention and promotion activities for this particular population.

General Guidelines:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

• This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
• Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
• This assignment requires that support your position by referencing at least six to eight scholarly resources. At least three of your supporting references must be from scholarly sources other than the assigned readings.
• You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Directions:

This assignment comprises the second part of the Epidemiology Paper. Write a 1,250-1,500 word paper that provides the following:

1. Identify an existing at-risk population. Using aggregated statistics, include identified criteria and data that substantiates why this population is at risk.
2. Using analyzed population data, identify a health risk within this population that nursing science can impact. Describe the specific variables. Provide SPSS data that correlates population to the identified health risk.
3. Identify potential obstacles that may hinder the implementation of the prevention and health promotion activities.
4. Identify stakeholders, individuals, and agencies with whom you may need to collaborate.

Portfolio Practice Hours:

Practice immersion assignments are based on your current course objectives, and are intended to be application-based learning using your real-world practice setting. These assignments earn practice immersion hours, and are indicated in the assignment by a Portfolio Practice Hours statement that reminds you, the learner, to enter a corresponding case log in Typhon. Actual clock hours are entered, but the average hours associated with each practice immersion assignment is 10.

You are required to complete your assignment using real-world application. Real-world application requires the use of evidence-based data, contemporary theories, and concepts presented in the course. The culmination of your assignment must present a viable application in a current practice setting. For more information on parameters for practice immersion hours, please refer to DNP resources in the DC Network.

To earn portfolio practice hours, enter the following after the references section of your paper:

Practice Hours Completion Statement DNP-825

I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I have also tracked said practice hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor.

Epidemiology Paper Part Two – Analysis and Application Rubric

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00% 2
Less Than Satisfactory
74.00% 3
Satisfactory
79.00% 4
Good
87.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
6.0 %Completed Changes and Corrected Errors to Subsequent Paper, Including Transitions for a Scholarly Paper Learner did not attach previous paper and did not make changes as indicated.DNP 825 Topic 3 Discussions & Epidemiology Paper Part Two N/A Learner attached previous paper and has made changes as indicated. Learner needs to incorporate transitions to connect the ideas between the papers Learner attached previous paper and has made changes as indicated. Learner needs to incorporate better transitions to connect the ideas between the papers. Learner attached previous paper and has made changes as indicated. Learner has includes all necessary transitions to create a scholarly paper.

18.0 %Identifies Existing At-Risk Population (Aggregated Statistics Support Claims, Identifies Criteria and Data That Substantiates That the Population Is at Risk) Paper does not establish that an existing population is at-risk using aggregated statistics. Paper does not accurately identify an existing at-risk population. Paper uses aggregated statistics to demonstrate that an existing population may be at-risk, but does not identify criteria to substantiate why the population is at-risk. Paper uses aggregated statistics to demonstrate that a population is at-risk. Paper identifies some criteria that explain why the population is at risk, but limited criteria does not substantiate why the population is at-risk. Paper uses aggregated statistics to demonstrate that a population is at-risk and identifies common criteria that substantiates why the population is at-risk. DNP 825 Topic 3 Discussions & Epidemiology Paper Part Two Paper uses aggregated statistics logically and accurately to demonstrate that a population is at-risk. Paper identifies strong criteria that substantiate why the population is at-risk.

18.0 %Population Analysis Identifies Health Risk Within Identified At-Risk Population That Nursing Science Can Impact (SPSS Data Correlates the Population to an Identified Health Risk; Describes Specific Variables) Paper does not perform a population analysis based on SPSS data. DNP 825 Topic 3 Discussions & Epidemiology Paper Part Two Population analysis is only partially based on SPSS data, and does not establish a correlation to a population or identified health risk that nursing science can impact. No specific variables are described. SPSS data is used in the population analysis, but the analysis is flawed or incomplete, and only a weak correlation suggests that nursing science may have an impact on the health risk for the population. Some specific variables have been described for the identified population. SPSS data is used in the population analysis, demonstrates a correlation to a population or identified health risk that nursing science can impact. Contributing variables have been identified for the population and health risk. Population analysis uses SPSS data logically and accurately to demonstrate a strong correlation between a population or identified health risk that nursing science can impact. Contributing variables are identified, thoroughly explored, and supported by data.

18.0 %Identifies Collaborators, Potential Obstacles and Solutions; Defines Outcomes and Timeframes, and Uses Contemporary Theories or Concepts for Support Paper does not identify collaborators or potential obstacles and solutions. Paper does not propose timeframe or use contemporary theories or concepts for support. DNP 825 Topic 3 Discussions & Epidemiology Paper Part Two Some collaborators and obstacles have been identified, but no evidence is proposed to assess or resolve potential obstacles. No clear timeframe has been established. Contemporary theories or concepts are not used for support. Potential collaborators and obstacles have been identified, but solutions for resolving conflict are vague. The timeframe has been established but is missing key elements needed. The use of contemporary theories and concepts is introduced. Potential collaborators and obstacles have been identified and general solutions for overcoming obstacles have been proposed. A general timeframe has been established. General support is offered through the use of contemporary theories and concepts. Paper demonstrates insightful use of contemporary theories and concepts for support. Paper identifies realistic collaborators and obstacles, provides well-researched solutions to overcome obstacles; defines clear timeline and expected outcomes.

10.0 %Six to Eight Additional Scholarly Research Sources With In-Text Citations None of the required elements (minimum of six topic-related scholarly research sources and six in-text citations) are present. Not all required elements are present. One or more elements are missing and/or included sources are not scholarly research or topic-related. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, but the source and quality of one or more references is questionable. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, and obtained from reputable professional sources. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness DNP 825 Topic 3 Discussions & Epidemiology Paper Part Two
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. DNP 825 Topic 3 Discussions & Epidemiology Paper Part Two Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. DNP 825 Topic 3 Discussions & Epidemiology Paper Part Two Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. DNP 825 Topic 3 Discussions & Epidemiology Paper Part Two

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct. DNP 825 Topic 3 Discussions & Epidemiology Paper Part Two

5.0 %Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. DNP 825 Topic 3 Discussions & Epidemiology Paper Part Two Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage

SAMPLE ANSWER

Epidemiology: Analysis and Application

Introduction to epidemiology

Epidemiology is the study of how often diseases occur in different groups of people and why. It is a vital tool for understanding and controlling the spread of disease.

Epidemiology can be used to identify risk factors for disease, design public health interventions, track the progress of outbreaks, and evaluate the effectiveness of preventative measures. It is essential for developing an understanding of how diseases work and how they can be controlled.

The first step in epidemiological analysis is to collect data on the occurrence of disease in a population. This data can come from medical records, surveys, or other sources. Once this data has been collected, it must be organized and analyzed to identify patterns and trends.

After the data has been analyzed, epidemiologists use their findings to develop hypotheses about what might be causing the diseases they are studying. These hypotheses are then tested through further research. If the hypotheses are supported by the evidence, they can be used to develop interventions to prevent or control the diseases in question.

Epidemiology is a powerful tool that can be used to improve public health. By understanding how diseases occur and spread, we can take steps to prevent them from happening in the first place or stop them from spreading further.

The different types of epidemiological studies

observational studies

case-control studies

cohort studies

randomized controlled trials

observational studies: these are used to examine associations between exposures and outcomes in populations. These study designs can be either cross-sectional or prospective. In a cross-sectional study, data on exposure and outcome are collected at the same time. In a prospective study, data on exposure are collected before outcome data are collected.

case-control studies: these are used to study associations between an exposure and an outcome that has already occurred. In a case-control study, cases (individuals with the outcome of interest) and controls (individuals without the outcome of interest) are identified and then exposed status is assessed for both groups. This design is efficient for studying rare outcomes.

cohort studies: these are used to study associations between an exposure and an outcome that may occur in the future. In a cohort study, a group of individuals is followed over time and exposed status is assessed at the beginning of the study period. Outcome data are then collected for individuals who develop the outcome of interest during the follow-up period. Cohort studies can be either prospective or retrospective. Prospective cohort studies follow participants forward in time from exposure assessment to outcomes occurrence while retrospective cohort studies follow participants backward in time, starting with the identification of cases and controls and then assessing their exposures.

randomized controlled trials: these are used to study causal relationships between an intervention and an

How to analyse epidemiological data

There are a number of different ways that epidemiological data can be analysed in order to gain insights into the patterns and trends of disease occurrence. One common approach is to calculate rates and ratios, which can provide information on the relative risk of developing a disease, or the burden of disease in a population.

Another approach is to use statistical methods to model the data, which can help to identify risk factors for disease and predict future patterns of disease occurrence. This type of analysis usually requires access to specialized software and training in statistical methods.

Qualitative methods such as interviews and focus groups can also be used to collect data on people’s perceptions and experiences of health and illness, which can provide valuable insights into how diseases develop and spread within communities.