Descriptive epidemiology and its relationship and role in nursing science today
DNP 825 Week 2 Epidemiology Paper Part One GCU
DNP 825 Week 2 Epidemiology Paper Part One GCU
DNP 825 Week 2 Epidemiology Paper Part One: Descriptive Method
Details:
The Epidemiology Paper is a practice immersion assignment designed to be completed in three sections, this is part one of the assignment. Learners are required discuss the role of descriptive epidemiology in nursing science and apply descriptive epidemiology in nursing science.
DNP 825 Week 2 Epidemiology Paper Part One GCU General Guidelines:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
- This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
- Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
- This assignment requires that support your position by referencing at least six to eight scholarly resources. At least three of your supporting references must be from scholarly sources other than the assigned readings.
- You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
DNP 825 Week 2 Epidemiology Paper Part One GCU Directions:
Write a 1,250–1,500 word paper discussing the role of descriptive epidemiology in nursing science. Include the following:
- Define descriptive epidemiology and describe its relationship and role in nursing science today.
- Provide a contemporary example of how descriptive epidemiology is applied in public health nursing.
- Identify the epidemiology components used to analyze at-risk populations.
Portfolio Practice Hours:
Practice immersion assignments are based on your current course objectives, and are intended to be application-based learning using your real-world practice setting. These assignments earn practice immersion hours, and are indicated in the assignment by a Portfolio Practice Hours statement that reminds you, the learner, to enter a corresponding case log in Typhon. Actual clock hours are entered, but the average hours associated with each practice immersion assignment is 10.
You are required to complete your assignment using real-world application. Real-world application requires the use of evidence-based data, contemporary theories, and concepts presented in the course. The culmination of your assignment must present a viable application in a current practice setting. For more information on parameters for practice immersion hours, please refer to DNP resources in the DC Network.
To earn portfolio practice hours, enter the following after the references section of your paper:
Practice Hours Completion Statement DNP-825
I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I have also tracked said practice hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor.
Descriptive epidemiology and its relationship and role in nursing science today
Introduction
Descriptive epidemiology is the study of the distribution and determinants of health-related states or events in specified populations, and the application of this study to control of health problems. It is a quantitative approach to the study of health that uses statistical methods to describe the patterns of diseases in human populations. Descriptive epidemiology has played a major role in nursing science since its inception. In the early days of nursing research, descriptive epidemiology was used to identify risk factors for disease and to understand the natural history of diseases. More recently, it has been used to develop and test interventions to prevent or control disease. Despite its important role in nursing science, descriptive epidemiology is often overlooked in favor of other approaches, such as experimental studies. However, descriptive epidemiology remains a valuable tool for understanding the distribution and determinants of health and disease in populations.
The different types of descriptive epidemiology
There are three main types of descriptive epidemiology: observational, experimental, and simulation.
Observational studies are used to collect data on exposures and outcomes of interest in order to identify risk factors for disease. Experimental studies are used to test causal hypotheses by manipulating exposure variables and observing the effect on outcome measures. Simulation studies use computer models to generate data on potential scenarios that could occur in the real world.
Descriptive epidemiology is a key tool in nursing science today. It helps us to understand the distribution of health conditions and diseases within populations, and can be used to identify risk factors and potential interventions.
The importance of nursing science today
As the field of healthcare rapidly changes and becomes increasingly complex, the need for sound nursing science has never been greater. Nursing science provides a strong foundation upon which to build evidence-based practice, improve patient outcomes, and advance the profession of nursing.
Today’s nurses must be able to critically appraise research, use technology, and work collaboratively in multidisciplinary teams. They must also be prepared to lead change and contribute to the advancement of the nursing profession. Nursing science is essential to meeting these challenges and preparing nurses for success in today’s ever-changing healthcare environment.
The relationship between descriptive epidemiology and nursing science
Descriptive epidemiology is the study of the distribution and determinants of health-related states or events (including disease, injury, and disability) in specified populations, and the application of this study to the control of health problems.
Nursing science is the systematic study of human responses to actual or potential health problems. It includes research on all aspects of nursing care, from how nurses can best support patients and families to how healthcare systems can be designed to improve patient outcomes.
The relationship between descriptive epidemiology and nursing science is one of mutual benefit. Descriptive epidemiology provides a framework for understanding patterns of health and disease in populations, while nursing science brings a focus on individual experience and human responses to illness and injury. Together, these two disciplines can provide a more complete picture of the factors that influence health and well-being, and help develop more effective interventions to promote population health.
How to use descriptive epidemiology in nursing research
Descriptive epidemiology is the study of the distribution and determinants of health-related states or events in specified populations, and the application of this knowledge to the control of health problems. It has played a major role in nursing research for many years, providing a foundation for further research into causes and prevention.
Descriptive epidemiology can be used to examine patterns of disease occurrence in order to identify risk factors and develop hypotheses about etiology. It can also be used to monitor trends in disease incidence and prevalence, and to evaluate the effectiveness of preventive and therapeutic interventions. In addition, descriptive epidemiology can be used to generate new ideas for research by identifying areas where little is known about a particular health problem.
There are a number of different methods that can be used in descriptive epidemiological studies, including retrospective cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional surveys, and ecological studies. Each has its own strengths and limitations, and the choice of method will depend on the specific question being asked.
When using descriptive epidemiology in nursing research, it is important to consider the potential sources of bias that could affect the results. These include selection bias, recall bias, information bias, and confounding. Careful study design and statistical analysis can help to minimize these biases.
Examples of studies that have used descriptive epidemiology
There are many different types of studies that have used descriptive epidemiology in order to better understand a certain phenomenon or answer a specific question. For example, studies have looked at the distribution of a disease in order to understand which groups are most affected and why. Additionally, descriptive epidemiology has been used to track the spread of diseases in order to predict future outbreaks and develop containment strategies.
One notable example of a study that used descriptive epidemiology is the Nurses’ Health Study, which began in 1976 and is still ongoing today. This study has used descriptive epidemiology to examine various health outcomes among nurses, including cardiovascular disease, cancer, and osteoporosis. The data collected from this study has helped to improve our understanding of these conditions and has led to changes in clinical practice.
Other examples of studies that have used descriptive epidemiology include those examining the impact of particular risk factors on health outcomes, such as smoking and obesity. By understanding how these factors affect the distribution of diseases, we can develop interventions to prevent or reduce their negative effects.
Conclusion
Descriptive epidemiology is a vital tool for nursing science today. By studying the distribution and determinants of health and disease in populations, nurses can develop interventions that target specific risk factors and improve population health. The use of descriptive epidemiology has led to important discoveries about the role of lifestyle choices in health and disease, and has helped guide the development of effective public health policy. As our understanding of the determinants of health continues to evolve, descriptive epidemiology will play an increasingly important role in shaping our approach to promoting population health.
Epidemiology Paper Part One: Descriptive Method Rubric
| 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2 Less Than Satisfactory 74.00% |
3 Satisfactory 79.00% |
4 Good 87.00% |
5 Excellent 100.00% |
||
| 70.0 %Content | ||||||
| 20.0 %Demonstrates an Understanding of Descriptive Epidemiology and Its Relationship to Nursing Science and Public Health Nursing | Paper does not demonstrate an understanding of descriptive epidemiology or its relationship to nursing science and public health nursing.DNP 825 Week 2 Epidemiology Paper Part One GCU | Paper shows a vague understanding of descriptive epidemiology, but does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship to nursing science and public health nursing. | Paper illustrates a general understanding of descriptive epidemiology, and shows a general relationship to nursing science and public health nursing, but lacks a clear understanding of data collection, conditions, or distribution and determinants in relationship to disease in populations. | Paper illustrates a theoretical understanding of descriptive epidemiology through an accurate discussion of distribution and disease determinants in populations. Paper demonstrates the functional relationship between descriptive epidemiology and nursing science and public health nursing. DNP 825 Week 2 Epidemiology Paper Part One GCU | Paper illustrates a theoretical and conceptual understanding of descriptive epidemiology and offers insight into using specific conditions (outcomes of exposure, person, place, etc.) to identify specific patterns. Paper shows the significant relationship between descriptive epidemiology and contemporary nursing science and public health nursing. | |
| 20.0 %Uses Contemporary Theories, Concepts, and Examples That Demonstrate an Ability to Identify, Analyze, and Apply Descriptive Epidemiology | Paper does not use contemporary theories, concepts, or examples as support or in the analysis of the paper. DNP 825 Week 2 Epidemiology Paper Part One GCU | Paper uses some aspects of contemporary theories and concepts throughout the paper, but no relevant examples are used. Overall, the concepts and theories used are incomplete or inaccurate and do not support the analysis or application of descriptive epidemiology. | Paper uses contemporary theories and concepts throughout the paper, and general examples are used for support. Overall, the concepts and theories used are very general and offer only minor support of the analysis or application of descriptive epidemiology presented in the paper. | Paper uses contemporary theories and concepts throughout the paper. Accurate and strong examples are used for support. Overall, the concepts and theories provide support of the analysis and application of descriptive epidemiology presented in the paper. | Paper uses contemporary theories and concepts throughout the paper. Accurate and strong examples are used for support. Overall, the concepts and theories provide support of the analysis and application of descriptive epidemiology presented in the paper. | |
| 20.0 %Demonstrates Knowledge of Health Disparities and the Variables Contributing to Health Disparity or At-Risk Populations | Paper does not demonstrate knowledge of health disparities, or of the variables contributing to health disparity or at-risk populations. | Paper demonstrates a rudimentary knowledge of the concept of health disparities, but does not demonstrate knowledge of the dimensions of disparity in a realistic setting, or of the variables contributing to the disparity or at-risk populations. | Paper demonstrates general knowledge of the dimensions of health disparities that occur in a realistic setting and identifies some general variables contributing to the disparity and the at-risk populations. | Paper demonstrates knowledge of the dimensions of health disparities that occur in a realistic setting and identifies specific variables contributing to health disparities and at-risk populations. DNP 825 Week 2 Epidemiology Paper Part One GCU | Paper demonstrates keen knowledge and unbiased insight pertaining to the dimensions of health disparities that occur in a realistic setting. Paper identifies significant variables from a broad spectrum that contribute to health disparities and at-risk populations. | |
| 10.0 %Six to Eight Additional Scholarly Research Sources With In-Text Citations | None of the required elements (minimum of six topic-related scholarly research sources and six in-text citations) are present. | Not all required elements are present. One or more elements are missing and/or included sources are not scholarly research or topic-related. | All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, but the source and quality of one or more references is questionable. | All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related and obtained from reputable, professional sources. | All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources. | |
| 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness | DNP 825 Week 2 Epidemiology Paper Part One GCU | |||||
| 7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. | Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | |
| 8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. DNP 825 Week 2 Epidemiology Paper Part One GCU | |
| 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | |
| 10.0 %Format | ||||||
| 5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | |
| 5.0 %Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) | No reference page is included. No citations are used. DNP 825 Week 2 Epidemiology Paper Part One GCU | Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. | Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. | Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. | In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. | |
|
100 %Total Weightage
|
||||||
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
