Assessing the Problem: Technology, Care Coordination, and Community Resources Considerations Scoring Guide

Scoring Guide

CRITERIA NON- PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Analyze the impact of health care technology on a patient, family, or population problem.

Does not describe the impact of health care technology on a patient, family, or population problem.

Describes the impact of health care technology on a patient, family, or population problem.

Analyzes the impact of health care technology on a patient, family, or population problem.

Conducts an astute analysis of the impact of health care technology on a patient, family, or population problem. Cites credible and balanced evidence of the advantages and disadvantages of specific technologies. Provides clear insight into current technology use in professional practice, as well as potential barriers and costs.

Explain how care coordination and the utilization of community resources can be used to address a patient, family, or population problem.

Does not describe the value of care coordination and the utilization of community resources in addressing health care challenges.

Attempts to describe the value of care coordination and the utilization of community resources in addressing health care challenges.

Explains how care coordination and the utilization of community resources can be used to address a patient, family, or population problem.

Provides a convincing explanation of how care coordination and the utilization of community resources can be used to address a patient, family, or population problem. Cites credible and balanced evidence of the benefits of care coordination and the use of community resources. Provides clear insight into current use in professional practice, as well as potential barriers.

Analyze state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies associated with health technology, care coordination, and community resources and document the practicum hours spent with these individuals or group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer Experience Form.

Does not describe state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies associated with health technology, care coordination, and community resources, and does not document practicum hours in Capella Academic Portal Volunteer Experience Form.

Attempts to describe state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies associated with health technology, care coordination, and community resources, and/or does not document practicum hours in Capella Academic Portal Volunteer Experience Form.

Analyzes state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies associated with health technology, care coordination, and community resources and documents the practicum hours spent with these individuals or group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer Experience Form.

Conducts an astute analysis of state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies associated with health technology, care coordination, and community resources. Clearly articulates the implications for ethical professional practice of applying standards and/or policy guidance or legislative requirements to the problem. Documents the practicum hours spent with these individuals or group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer Experience Form

Support main points, Does not support Sources lack Supports main Supports main points, assertions,

12/22/23, 4:10 PMAssessing the Problem: Technology, Care Coordination, and Community Resources Considerations Scoring Guide

Page 2 of 2https://a21371-1390071.cluster223.canvas-user-content.com/courses…57&context_type=Course&download=1&id=213710000001390071&inline=1

assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

relevance or credibility, or the evidence is not persuasive or explicitly supportive of main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations.

points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Skillfully combines virtually error-free source citations with a perceptive and coherent synthesis of the evidence.

Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

Does not apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

Applies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing incorrectly and/or inconsistently, detracting noticeably from good scholarship.

Applies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

Applies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to stylistic conventions, document structure, and source attributions.