Capstone cases of Illinois v. Lara, California v. Towler, 641 P. 2d 1253 (Cal. 1982), Smith v. Doe, and Rogers v. Tennessee, 532 U.S. 45 (2001).

· In the case of   Illinois v. Lara, A jury found the defendant, Jason Lara, guilty of two counts of predatory criminal sexual assault based on the claim that he sexually penetrated an eight-year-old girl. On appeal, Lara argued that the State failed to prove the  corpus delicti of the offense because the State failed to present any evidence corroborating Lara’s confession that he sexually penetrated the alleged victim. Provide some examples of how  corpus delicti could have been proven for the more serious sexual assault offense alleged at issue in the case.

· Do you believe that  corpus delicti serves an important purpose, or should confessions be allowed to stand alone as evidence to support convictions?

· Read the court’s opinion in  California v. Towler, 641 P. 2d 1253 (Cal. 1982). Discuss how a defendant’s  motive, intent, and  opportunity can contribute to evidentiary proof that a murder has occurred.

· In the capstone Case:  Smith v. Doe, the Alaska Sex Offender Registration Act requires convicted sex offenders to register with law enforcement authorities, and much of the information is made public. The U.S. Supreme Court considers whether the registration requirement is a retroactive punishment prohibited by the Ex Post Facto Clause. Do you find that the Alaska registration law is not punitive and therefore not  an ex post facto law? Why or why not?

· Should restrictions on  ex post facto laws apply to administrative procedures, such as parole hearings, or should they only apply to laws that define crimes themselves?

· Read and compare the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in  Rogers v. Tennessee, 532 U.S. 451 (2001), where the Court considered whether a trial court can retroactively alter a common law rule that governs causation in homicide cases. What considerations does the Court identify determining whether to allow a retroactive change to the state’s longstanding common law rule?

· Which opinion—majority or dissenting—do you find more legally persuasive?

Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers

Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.

Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS

Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?

Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.

We write plagiarism Free Content

Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.

Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.