This week we have an assignment regarding the neurologic and musculoskeletal system.? Please use the following interactive media case for your paper:? https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2det
This week we have an assignment regarding the neurologic and musculoskeletal system. Please use the following interactive media case for your paper:
https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/NURS/6521/05/mm/decision_trees/week_10/index.html
DECISION TREE FOR NEUROLOGICAL AND MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
For your Assignment, your Instructor will assign you one of the decision tree interactive media pieces provided in the Resources. As you examine the patient case studies in this module’s Resources, consider how you might assess and treat patients presenting symptoms of neurological and musculoskeletal disorders.
To Prepare:
- Review the interactive media piece assigned by your Instructor.
- Reflect on the patient’s symptoms and aspects of the disorder presented in the interactive media piece.
- Consider how you might assess and treat patients presenting with the symptoms of the patient case study you were assigned.
- You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the diagnosis and treatment for this patient. Reflect on potential co-morbid physical as well as patient factors that might impact the patient’s diagnosis and treatment.
Write a 1- to 2-page summary paper that addresses the following:
- Briefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned, including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented.
- Based on the decisions you recommended for the patient case study, explain whether you believe the decisions provided were supported by the evidence-based literature. Be specific and provide examples. Be sure to support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.
- What were you hoping to achieve with the decisions you recommended for the patient case study you were assigned? Support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.
- Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decision in the exercise. Describe whether they were different. Be specific and provide examples.
Due Sunday by 10:59pm Points 100 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2
Start Assignment
Back to Week at a Glance (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/85599/modules/items/2745466)
(https://cdn-
media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_932736896.jpg) Submit your Assignment, started in Week 6.
DECISION TREE FOR NEUROLOGICAL AND MUSCULOSKELETAL
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/85599/modules/items/2745469)
BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 8
NURS_6521_Week8_Assignment_Rubric
Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center offers an example of those required elements (available at http://writingcenter.waldenu.edu/57.htm (http://writingcenter.waldenu.edu/57.htm) ). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK8Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page. 3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Criteria Ratings Pts
20 pts
25 pts
20 pts
Briefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned, including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented. Be specific.
20 to >17.8 pts Excellent
The response accurately and thoroughly summarizes in detail the patient case study assigned, including specific and complete details on each of the three decisions made for the patient presented.
17.8 to >15.8 pts Good
The response accurately summarizes the patient case study assigned, including details on each of the three decisions made for the patient presented.
15.8 to >13.8 pts Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the patient case study assigned, including details on each of the three decisions made for the patient presented.
13.8 to >0 pts Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the patient case study assigned, including details on each of the three decisions made for the patient presented, or is missing.
Based on the decisions you recommended for the patient case study, explain whether you believe the decisions provided were supported by the evidence-based literature. Be specific and provide examples. Be sure to support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.
25 to >22.25 pts Excellent
The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence-based literature. … The response includes specific and relevant outside reference examples that fully support the explanation provided.
22.25 to >19.75 pts Good
The response accurately explains how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence- based literature. … The response includes relevant outside reference examples that lend support for the explanation provided that are accurate.
19.75 to >17.25 pts Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence- based literature. … The response includes inaccurate or vague outside reference examples that may or may not lend support for the explanation provided or are misaligned to the explanation provided.
17.25 to >0 pts Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence- based literature, or is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague outside reference examples that do not lend support for the explanation provided, or is missing.
What were you hoping to achieve with the decisions you
20 to >17.8 pts Excellent
17.8 to >15.8 pts Good
15.8 to >13.8 pts Fair
13.8 to >0 pts Poor
Criteria Ratings Pts
20 pts
recommended for the patient case study you were assigned? Support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.
The response accurately and thorough explains in detail what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommend for the patient case study assigned. … The response includes specific and relevant outside reference examples that fully support the explanation provided.
The response accurately explains what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommended for the patient case study assigned. … The response includes relevant outside reference examples that lend support for the explanation provided that are accurate.
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommended for the patient case study assigned. … The response includes inaccurate or vague outside reference examples that may or may not lend support for the explanation provided or are misaligned to the explanation provided.
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommended for the patient case study assigned, or is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague outside reference examples that do not lend support for the explanation provided, or is missing.
Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise. Describe whether they were different. Be specific and provide examples.
20 to >17.8 pts Excellent The response accurately and clearly explains in detail any differences between what they expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise. … The response provides specific, accurate, and relevant examples that fully support whether there were differences between the decisions made and the decisions available in the exercise.
17.8 to >15.8 pts Good The response accurately explains any differences between what they expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise. … The response provides accurate examples that support whether there were differences between the decisions made and the decisions available in the exercise.
15.8 to >13.8 pts Fair The response inaccurately or vaguely explains any differences between what they expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise. … The response provides inaccurate or vague examples that may or may not support whether there were differences between the decisions made and the decisions available in the exercise.
13.8 to >0 pts Poor vaguely explains in detail any differences between what they expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise, or is missing. … The response provides inaccurate and vague examples that do not support whether there were differences between the decisions made and the decisions
Criteria Ratings Pts
5 pts
5 pts
5 pts
available in the exercise, or is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
5 to >4.45 pts Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
4.45 to >3.95 pts Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
3.95 to >3.45 pts Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
3.45 to >0 pts Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.45 pts Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors
4.45 to >3.95 pts Good
Contains a few (1– 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
3.95 to >3.45 pts Fair
Contains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
3.45 to >0 pts Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-
5 to >4.45 pts Excellent Uses correct APA format with no errors
4.45 to >3.95 pts Good Contains a few (1– 2) APA format errors
3.95 to >3.45 pts Fair Contains several (3–4) APA format errors
3.45 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors
Total Points: 100
Criteria Ratings Pts
text citations, and reference list.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
