Create a 10-15 digital slide presentation as professional development for your school’s chosen leaders on the coaching cycle, including how to provide appropriate feedback.
School administrators must regularly evaluate the needs of their school and analyze the abilities of the faculty and staff in being able to meet those needs. When supporting school leaders it is important to provide them valuable, empowering professional development opportunities that enhance their abilities to provide effective guidance and leadership to others.
Create a 10-15 digital slide presentation as professional development for your school’s chosen leaders on the coaching cycle, including how to provide appropriate feedback.
Address the following within the presentation:
Explain the criteria and processes for selecting faculty leaders
Explain the coaching cycle and its value within your school.
Describe expectations regarding the quality of feedback and how feedback should reflect the school’s culture and incorporate respect.
Provide two specific examples of implementing the coaching cycle within your school (one with faculty and one with support staff).
Title slide, reference slide, and presenter’s notes.
Support your findings with 2-3 scholarly resources.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Requirements: 10-12 slides with speaker notes
Empowering Leaders Professional Development – RubricCriteria and Processes10.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionCriteria and Processes5. Target10.5 pointsPresentation thoroughly explains the criteria and processes for selecting facultyleaders.4. Acceptable9.14 pointsPresentation soundly explains the criteria and processes for selecting facultyleaders.3. Approaching7.77 pointsPresentation weakly explains the criteria and processes for selecting faculty leaders.2. Insufficient7.24 pointsPresentation inadequately explains the criteria and processes for selecting facultyleaders.1. No Submission0 pointsCoaching Cycle10.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionCoaching Cycle5. Target10.5 pointsPresentation comprehensively explains the coaching cycle and its value within theschool.4. Acceptable9.14 pointsPresentation logically explains the coaching cycle and its value within the school.3. Approaching7.77 pointsCollapse All
Presentation inexplicitly explains the coaching cycle and its value within the school.2. Insufficient7.24 pointsPresentation poorly explains the coaching cycle and its value within the school.1. No Submission0 pointsFeedback14 pointsCriteria DescriptionFeedback5. Target14 pointsPresentation proficiently describes expectations regarding the quality of feedbackand how feedback should reflect the school’s culture and incorporate respect.4. Acceptable12.18 pointsPresentation reasonably describes expectations regarding the quality of feedbackand how feedback should reflect the school’s culture and incorporate respect.3. Approaching10.36 pointsPresentation vaguely describes expectations regarding the quality of feedback andhow feedback should reflect the school’s culture and incorporate respect.2. Insufficient9.66 pointsPresentation inefficiently describes expectations regarding the quality of feedbackand how feedback should reflect the school’s culture and incorporate respect.1. No Submission0 pointsNot addressed.Implementation14 pointsCriteria DescriptionImplementation5. Target14 points
Presentation expertly provides two specific examples of implementing the coachingcycle within the school (one with faculty and one with support staff).4. Acceptable12.18 pointsPresentation clearly provides two specific examples of implementing the coachingcycle within the school (one with faculty and one with support staff).3. Approaching10.36 pointsPresentation provides two shallow examples of implementing the coaching cyclewithin the school (one with faculty and one with support staff).2. Insufficient9.66 pointsPresentation provides less than two or two imprecise examples of implementingthe coaching cycle within the school.Visual Appeal7 pointsCriteria DescriptionVisual Appeal5. Target7 pointsThe slide digital presentation is visually pleasing for the audience. There is a goodvariety and use of graphics, colors, and fonts. The arrangement of material islogically organized for presentation.4. Acceptable6.09 pointsThematic graphic elements are used, but not always in context. Visual connectionsmostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships.Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently.3. Approaching5.18 pointsMinimal use of graphic elements is evident. Elements do not consistently contributeto the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. There is some variationin type size, color, and layout.2. Insufficient4.83 points
There are few or no graphic elements. No variation in layout or typography isOrganization3.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionOrganization5. Target3.5 pointsThe content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideasthat relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and providesthe audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is within therequired word count.4. Acceptable3.05 pointsThe content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. Thecontent provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary iswithin a reasonable range of the required word count.3. Approaching2.59 pointsThe content is not adequately organized even though it provides the audience witha sense of the main idea. The summary may not be within a reasonable range of therequired word count.2. Insufficient2.42 pointsAn attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. Theideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other; or thesummary is widely outside of the required word count.Documentation of Sources3.5 pointsCriteria Descriptioncitations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment andstyle5. Target3.5 pointsSources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignmentand style. Format is free of error.4. Acceptable3.05 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format ismostly correct.3. Approaching2.59 pointsSources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although somekey formatting and citation errors are present.2. Insufficient2.42 pointsDocumentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate toassignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Mechanics of Writing7 pointsCriteria Descriptionincludes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use5. Target7 pointsSubmission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures arevaried and engaging.4. Acceptable6.09 pointsSubmission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hindercomprehension. Variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as somepractice and content-related language.3. Approaching5.18 pointsFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistentlanguage or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking.2. Insufficient4.83 pointsSurface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.1. No Submission0 pointsTotal70points
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
