How did the United Nations Security Council’s management of Iraq Weapon Inspection contribute to the broader understanding of international conflict resolution, diplomacy, and the pursuit of global peace?
Use this tab to upload your Research Paper by the close of Week 8. The Research Paper will be based on the topic you proposed in the Week 2 Research Question/Purpose Statement
Having formulated a research question (via the 1st Assignment), you lay out a logical and well-referenced case to support your point(s). The paper should include the following sections at minimum: Introduction (approximately 1 page), Research design/methods (1/2-1 page), Body of your discussion (do not label this section “Body”—label it (headings and subheadings) based upon the content you are discussing), Summary/conclusion (1/2 – 1 page), References.
The paper should be between 10-12 pages in length (double-spaced, 12-point font), not including the cover page, references, and any appendices. References must be in Chicago format. For more tips on writing a good research paper, see the resources here.
Requirements: 10-12 Pages
Kehinde Abijo
International Political Systems
Dr. BD Mowell
August 20, 2023
Examining International Conflict Resolution through the Lens of the United Nations Security Council: Analyze the UN (United Nations) Security Council’s Iraq Weapon Inspection as a Case Study
Introduction
The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) is one of the central institutions for resolving disputes and conducting international diplomacy. This esteemed organization has faced numerous worldwide problems while attempting to promote peace and uphold global security (Gray & Baturo, 2021). The controversy surrounding the Iraq Weapon Inspections is still a standout among the many complex problems that have come up on its agenda. In addition to offering a unique prism to understand international conflict resolution, examining this particular episode in the history of the UNSC also provides insightful information on the dynamics of power, diplomacy, and cooperation on the world scene (Binder & Golub 2020).
An in-depth examination of the UN Security Council’s handling of the Iraqi Weapon Inspection is the goal of this research paper, which will also examine this incident in light of more general discussions on resolving international disputes. We want to comprehend the methods, difficulties, and successes of the UNSC in its pursuit of international peace by closely examining the events preceding and following the inspections. The modern world, where international collaboration and conflict resolution remain crucial in resolving the issues of our interconnected global society, makes this inquiry particularly pertinent.
Research Question
In light of these factors, the following is the main research question that directs this investigation:
How did the United Nations Security Council’s management of Iraq Weapon Inspection contribute to the broader understanding of international conflict resolution, diplomacy, and the pursuit of global peace?
This research question highlights the importance of this analysis while also capturing the study’s main point of interest. We want to shed light on the more significant dynamics of international conflict resolution and diplomacy by examining the difficulties of the UNSC’s approach to the Iraq Weapon Inspection, providing valuable lessons for academics, policymakers, and global citizens. To lay the groundwork for a thorough investigation of this vital subject, we will go into more detail about the goal of this research and do an initial evaluation of the pertinent literature in the following parts.
Purpose Statement
The handling of the Iraq Weapon Inspection by the UN Security Council (UNSC) is chosen as the research’s primary focus for several reasons. First, a thorough understanding of the UNSC’s actions and decision-making procedures is essential, given its position as a crucial organization in international diplomacy. Second, the Iraq Weapon Inspection marks a crucial turning point in the UNSC’s history, with ramifications for current international relations.
The value of this study resides in its potential to illuminate the processes and dynamics involved in resolving international disputes, with implications that go beyond the confines of the particular case study. Lessons learned from the UNSC’s handling of the Iraqi Weapon Inspection can be highly insightful to politicians and academics as the world struggles with ongoing threats to peace and security. This study intends to add to a nuanced understanding of diplomacy, cooperation, and the pursuit of world peace by evaluating the complexity of the UNSC’s strategy.
Furthermore, as shown by the choice of publications released after 2020, this research aims to close a significant knowledge gap by incorporating contemporary opinions and scholarship. With this strategy, the analysis is kept up to date and placed at the forefront of conversations on global conflict resolution and the function of international institutions.
In a nutshell, this research serves two purposes: to provide a thorough examination of how the UNSC managed the Iraq Weapon Inspection and to offer a more comprehensive understanding of international conflict resolution diplomacy alongside the pursuit of world peace, drawing on the lessons and insights gleaned from this crucial historical case study.
The significance and applicability of this research will be further supported by a preliminary literature evaluation of sources published after 2020, which will be covered in more detail in the following parts.
Preliminary Literature Review
Fall, J. J. (2020). Territory, sovereignty, and entitlement: Diplomatic discourses in the United Nations Security Council. Political geography, 81, 102208.
The author of Fall’s paper, “Territory, Sovereignty, and Entitlement: Diplomatic Discourses in the United Nations Security Council,” dives into the complex diplomatic discourses occurring within the UNSC concerning problems of territory, sovereignty, and entitlement. The study sheds light on the intricacies of international diplomacy by providing a detailed evaluation of how these fundamental principles are discussed and negotiated within the UNSC.
Fall’s research is especially pertinent to our study since it emphasizes the UNSC’s crucial influence on the development of international discourse, a subject we explore in depth as we examine the UNSC’s management of the Iraq Weapon Inspection. We might anticipate insights into the discursive frameworks that might have impacted the UNSC’s decisions and actions during this crucial time by examining Fall’s work, which will help us better comprehend the larger environment in which our case study takes place.
Yuan, X. (2022). The Chinese approach to peacebuilding: contesting liberal peace? Third World Quarterly, 43(7), 1798-1816.
In his work titled “The Chinese approach to Peacebuilding: Contesting Liberal Peace?,” Yuan investigates China’s distinct view of peacebuilding and how it can challenge the Western liberal peace paradigm. Yuan’s study explores China’s peacebuilding strategies, notably in the context of global crises and conflicts. The study investigates whether or not China’s strategy differs from traditional Western peacebuilding ideas.
This article is pertinent to our research because it critically analyzes alternative strategies for resolving disputes and promoting peace. This analysis may have repercussions for analyzing how the United Nations Security Council handles major international conflicts like the Iraq Weapon Inspection. Our investigation of international diplomacy and conflict resolution dynamics gains a crucial dimension from learning how China views and participates in peacebuilding. Yuan’s study sheds light on how the field of peacebuilding tactics has changed in the context of modern international relations.
Fawcett, L., & Jagtiani, S. L. (2022). Regional powers, global aspirations: lessons from India and Iran. International Politics, 1-24.
In their paper titled “Regional powers, global aspirations: lessons from India and Iran,” authors Fawcett and Jagtiani explore the foreign policy plans and aspirations of two critical regional powers, Iran and India. The authors closely examine their geopolitical aspirations and diplomatic practices as these countries navigate the challenging shift from being regional actors to global ones on the international scene.
This research is pertinent to our study because it emphasizes how regional powers’ responsibilities in international diplomacy and conflict resolution are changing. This issue is crucial to understanding how the United Nations Security Council acted concerning the Iraq Weapon Inspection. Fawcett and Jagtiani provide important lessons and insights into how regional powers negotiate their interests and goals in the international arena by analyzing the experiences of India and Iran, which may provide similarities to the dynamics at play inside the UNSC during our chosen case study period.
The essay provides a clearer understanding of the role of developing powers in influencing international relations and efforts to resolve conflicts by shedding light on the intricate interplay between regional and global factors. The work of Fawcett and Jagtiani is an essential source for our broader investigation of the dynamics of international diplomacy and UNSC cooperation.
Stieb, J. (2023). Why Did the United States Invade Iraq? The Debate at 20 Years (Summer 2023). Texas National Security Review.
The study of the root reasons for the Iraq War can be successfully divided into two schools of thought, the security school and the hegemony school, two decades after the war’s inception. Security school academics argue that the main driving force behind the Bush administration’s decision to invade Iraq was to ensure the safety of the United States by addressing worries about Iraq’s possession of WMDs and its alleged ties to terrorist organizations. On the other hand, the hegemony school asserts that the Iraq War was intended to advance liberal democratic values while retaining and extending U.S. hegemony. The ongoing disputes between these two points of view influence the relevance of the Iraq War and have extensive ramifications for the future course of American foreign policy and the examination of other crucial factors pertaining to the war’s origins.
However, this binary split might not be the most useful foundation for developing research on the Iraq War. Instead, a more effective strategy can involve paying more attention to cultural and global aspects, providing fresh perspectives and insights to advance the field of study.
Summersett, G. P., & Alade, A. A. (2022). The Global Peace Mandate of the United Nations Security Council, Conflict Management and the Israeli-Palestinian Question. Journal of Contemporary International Relations and Diplomacy, 3(2), 512-527.
The ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the primary topic of the study by Summersett and Alade (2022), which explores the role of the UN Security Council in managing international conflicts. By taking a doctrinal perspective, the research aims to evaluate the violence that continues to erupt between Israel and Palestine and investigate potential avenues for the UN Security Council’s role in conflict management and settlement.
The study clarifies the function of the Security Council, its endeavors, and the enormous difficulties it encounters in assisting the end of lengthy conflicts. The report highlights the need for Council reform rates among the most urgent global political challenges while also noting the Security Council’s significant contributions to global peace, a fundamental principle of macroeconomic stability.
Conclusion
The United Nations Security Council’s involvement with the Iraq Weapon Inspection, an essential incident in international conflict resolution and diplomacy, was thoroughly examined during this research work. A research topic that attempted to understand the nuances of the Security Council’s decisions and their broader ramifications served as the starting point for our investigation.
This study has two goals: to clarify the processes and dynamics involved in resolving international disputes and to offer insightful information on worldwide initiatives to promote peace and security. This goal was supported by the idea that knowledge of the past will determine how international diplomacy will develop.
Through our preliminary assessment of the literature, we looked at the writings of academics who have studied related facets of international politics, ranging from the Security Council’s function in maintaining the world’s peace to different methods of conflict resolution used by regional powers. These resources improved our comprehension of the many facets of our research topic.
In a nutshell, this study emphasizes the necessity of researching historical occurrences within the framework of international relations, such as the Iraq Weapon Inspection. It acts as a reminder that the lessons learned in the past can still be used to inform present-day actions and choices. Our investigation has shed light on essential facets of world diplomacy. Still, it has also made clear the need for more study and possible changes to international organizations like the UN Security Council.
Lessons learned from our research can influence scholarly discussion and policymakers’ and diplomats’ decisions as they negotiate the challenging terrain of international conflict resolution as we stand at the nexus of the past and the future. Ultimately, the quest for world peace and security remains highly significant and necessitates constant commitment and meticulous research.
References
Gray, J., & Baturo, A. (2021). Delegating diplomacy: rhetoric across agents in the United Nations General Assembly. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 87(4), 718-736.
Binder, M., & Golub, J. (2020). Civil conflict and agenda-setting speed in the United Nations Security Council. International Studies Quarterly, 64(2), 419-430.
Fall, J. J. (2020). Territory, sovereignty and entitlement: Diplomatic discourses in the United Nations Security Council. Political geography, 81, 102208.
Yuan, X. (2022). The Chinese approach to peacebuilding: contesting liberal peace?. Third World Quarterly, 43(7), 1798-1816.
Fawcett, L., & Jagtiani, S. L. (2022). Regional powers, global aspirations: lessons from India and Iran. International Politics, 1-24.
Stieb, J. (2023). Why Did the United States Invade Iraq? The Debate at 20 Years (Summer 2023). Texas National Security Review.
Summersett, G. P., & Alade, A. A. (2022). The Global Peace Mandate of the United Nations Security Council, Conflict Management and the Israeli-Palestinian Question. Journal of Contemporary International Relations and Diplomacy, 3(2), 512-527.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.