Select a country of your choice (other than Saudi Arabia) and discuss why the country imposes trade barriers. What is the effect on the economy of the country? (Analyze the effect on the trade balance, employment, and economic growth). What are the arguments for and against trade barriers in your chosen country?

Critical Thinking: Trade barriers

Select a country of your choice (other than Saudi Arabia) and discuss why the country imposes trade barriers. What is the effect on the economy of the country? (Analyze the effect on the trade balance, employment, and economic growth). What are the arguments for and against trade barriers in your chosen country?

Directions:

Your essay is required to be four to five pages in length, which does not include the title page and reference pages, which are never a part of the content minimum requirements.

Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least three scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles. Use the Saudi Digital Library to find your resources.

Use Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and follow APA style guidelines.

It is strongly encouraged that you submit all assignments into Turnitin prior to submitting them to your instructor for grading. If you are unsure how to submit an assignment into the Originality Check tool, review the Turnitin – Student Guide for step-by-step instructions.

Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.

Plagiarism: Plagiarism is NOT tolerated. All assignments will be auto checked for plagiarism. If you are found to have more than 25% similarity with previous work, you will be graded zero in your assignment. Repeating such offense could result in your termination.

Review the grading rubric (Attached) to see how you will be graded for this assignment.

Recommended:

Chapter 5 in International Economics

Ting, C., & Hsiao, Y. (2020). Exploring solutions for the trade barriers in Taiwan. Advances in Management and Applied Economics, 10(5), 17-34.

Zolin, M., Cavapozzi, D., & Mazzarolo, M. (2020). Food security and trade policies: evidence from the milk sector, case study. British Food Journal, 123(13), 59-72. Retrieved from https://doi-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2020-0577

Requirements: four to five pages in length, which does not include the title page and reference pages

CT_Rubric_100100 Points Levels of AchievementCriteriaExceeds ExpectationMeets ExpectationSome ExpectationsUnsatisfactoryContent 33 to 35 pointsDemonstratessubstantial andextensive knowledge ofthe materials, with noerrors or majoromissions.29 to 32 pointsDemonstrates adequateknowledge of thematerials; may includesome minor errors oromissions.26 to 28 pointsDemonstrates fairknowledge of the materialsand/or includes somemajor errors or omissions.0 to 25 pointsFails to demonstrateknowledge of thematerials and/orincludes many majorerrors or omissions.Analysis 33 to 35 pointsProvides strong thought,insight, and analysis ofconcepts andapplications.29 to 32 pointsProvides adequatethought, insight, andanalysis of concepts andapplications.26 to 28 pointsProvides poor though,insight, and analysis ofconcepts and applications.0 to 25 pointsProvides little or nothought, insight, andanalysis of concepts andapplications.Sources 15 to 15 pointsSources go above andbeyond required criteriaand are well chosen toprovide eectivesubstance andperspectives on theissue underexamination.13 to 14 pointsSources meet requiredcriteria and areadequately chosen toprovide substance andperspectives on the issueunder examination.11 to 12 pointsSources meet requiredcriteria but are poorlychosen to providesubstance and perspectiveson the issue underexamination.0 to 10 pointsSource selection andintegration of knowledgefrom the course is clearlydecient.Demonstratescollege-levelprociency inorganization,grammar andstyle. 15 to 15 pointsProject is clearlyorganized, well written,and in proper format asoutlined in theassignment. Strongsentence and paragraphstructure, contains noerrors in grammar,spelling, APA style, orAPA citations andreferences.13 to 14 pointsProject is fairly wellorganized and writtenand is in proper format asoutlined in theassignment. Reasonablygood sentence andparagraph structure, mayinclude a few minorerrors in grammar,spelling, APA style, or APAcitations and references.11 to 12 pointsProject is poorly organizedand written and may notfollow proper format asoutlined in the assignment.Inconsistent to inadequatesentence and paragraphdevelopment, and/orincludes numerous ormajor errors in grammar,spelling, APA style or APAcitations and references.0 to 10 pointsProject is not organizedor well written and is notin proper format asoutlined in theassignment. Poor qualitywork; unacceptable interms of grammar,spelling, APA style, andAPA citations andreferences. NameDescriptionRubric DetailView Associated ItemsPrintClose Window