Analyze technological tools, their positive and negative impacts, the policies that govern them, and their scope of use.

CJ 305 Module Four Assignment Guidelines and Rubric

Overview

In this assignment, you will analyze technological tools, their positive and negative impacts, the policies that govern them, and their scope of use. It’s important to take all of these

considerations into account before implementing new tools in your agency.

Prompt

In this module you have explored the in�uence of technology on criminal investigations. You have also previously examined the pros and cons of tool usage and the policies that govern them.

You will now bring these concepts together to complete your Module Four assignment. This application of knowledge will help you prepare for Project Two in Module Six, where you will create

a new technology pitch for a law enforcement agency.

First, select three tools you have been exposed to in this course and identify what they are and how they work.

Next, describe the positive impacts of using each tool.

Consider positive impacts related to law enforcement, criminal investigations, and the community perspective.

Then, describe the negative impacts of using each tool.

Consider negative impacts related to law enforcement, criminal investigations, and the community perspective.

Finally, describe any policies or laws that currently exist to govern the use of each tool.

Are there any policies or laws that you think should be added to what currently exists?

Speci�cally, the following rubric criteria must be addressed:

Select three tools and identify what they are and how they work.

Describe the positive impacts of using each tool.

Describe the negative impacts of using each tool.

Describe laws and policies for each tool that govern or should govern their scope of use.

What to Submit

This assignment must be completed using the Module Four Assignment Template Word Document. Any references should be cited in APA style. For more information on APA style, review the

Shapiro Library APA Style Guide.



https://learn.snhu.edu/content/enforced/1373942-CJ-305-R1613-OL-TRAD-UG.23EW1/Course%20Documents/CJ%20305%20Module%20Four%20Assignment%20Template.docx?_&d2lSessionVal=83DQCJSzC8sRc7nTHNvb3R3V9&ou=1373942

http://libguides.snhu.edu/apa

https://app.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=9568&url=https%3A%2F%2Flearn.snhu.edu%2Fcontent%2Fenforced%2F1373942-CJ-305-R1613-OL-TRAD-UG.23EW1%2FModule%2520Four%2520Assignment%2520Guidelines%2520and%2520Rubric.html&lang=en_us&readid=d2l_read_element_1

Module Four Assignment Rubric

Criteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Articulation of Response Exceeds pro�ciency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner

Clearly conveys meaning with correct grammar, sentence structure, and spelling Shows progress toward pro�ciency, but with errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling Submission has critical errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling

Tool Selection and Function Exceeds pro�ciency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner Selects three tools and identi�es what they are and how they work Shows progress toward pro�ciency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include additional details or clari�cation on de�ning the tool or describing how it is used

Does not attempt criterion 20 Positive Impacts Exceeds pro�ciency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner

Describes the positive impacts of using each tool Shows progress toward pro�ciency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include additional details or clari�cation explaining how this crime affected individuals Does not attempt criterion 20

Negative Impacts Exceeds pro�ciency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner Describes the negative impacts of using each tool Shows progress toward pro�ciency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include additional details or clari�cation on the negative impacts on different audiences Does not attempt criterion 20 Policies and Scope of Use Exceeds pro�ciency in an exceptionally clear, insightful,  sophisticated, or creative mannerDescribes policies and laws foreach tool that govern or should govern their scope of use Shows progress toward pro�ciency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include additional details or clari�cation related to policies  and laws that govern or should govern their scope of use Does not attempt criterion 20

Criteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value Citations and Attributions Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with few or no minor errors Uses citation for ideas requiring attribution Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with major errors Does not use citations for ideas requiring attribution 5

Total: 100%