What is the interplay between neurogenesis and neuroplasticity?

Neuroplasticity of the Brain

Students have been reviewing and learning about the neuroanatomy, neurobiology, and cellular function of the brain. This review is applied through the following learning activity aimed at solidifying the subject matter. In particular, students should answer the following question:

What is the interplay between neurogenesis and neuroplasticity? PMHNP Discussion Board Rubric 2023 (2)

PMHNP Discussion Board Rubric 2023 (2)

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInitial post demonstrates knowledge and understanding of content and application. Minimum of 500 words excluding references.

40 pts

Full Marks

Addresses fully and accurately each point asked in the discussion question. Rich in content, full of thought, insight, and analysis demonstrates high level of critical thinking.

40 to >17.14 pts

Partial Marks [>15-34]

Addresses each point accurately, in part, as noted with substantial information and analysis.

17.14 to >0 pts

Few Marks

Does not fully or in part, and/or accurately address all points within the required discussion board. General information only, w/o analysis or insight displayed.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCites appropriate professional references to support position. Appropriate references are defined for this discussion as those reference sources no older than 5 years unless it is a class textbook or known source older than the requisite year limit. Please note: subsequent posts must be from different journal articles.

20 pts

Full Marks

Student uses a minimum of 2 or more peer – reviewed source for initial posting that address the original topic, and 1 peer-reviewed source in each response.

20 to >10.0 pts

Partial Marks [>10-19]

Student uses 1 peer-reviewed source and 1 non-peer-reviewed source in the initial posting, and 1 peer-reviewed source in each response.

10 to >0 pts

Few Marks

Student uses 2 or less peer-reviewed sources, and text books, course articles, and/or no references for postings.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponses to other colleagues’ contributes new thoughts & ideas to topic. Minimum of 250 words per response excluding references.

20 pts

Full Marks

Responses to other colleagues contributes new insight or information to topic.

20 to >9.33 pts

Partial Marks [>7-14]

At least one response to other colleague does offer new insight or information to topic.

9.33 to >0 pts

Few Marks

Participation is without meaningful contribution. Student agrees/disagrees with peers and provides similar information as provide in the colleagues posts.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTimeliness

10 pts

Full Marks

Initial post on time.

10 to >5.0 pts

Partial Marks [>5-9]

Initial post made after deadline, but within 4-12 hours and/or responses to colleagues do not give reasonable time for other colleagues to respond.

5 to >0 pts

Few Marks

Initial post made greater than 12 hours after deadline, and/or responses to colleagues do not give reasonable time for other colleagues to respond.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA formatting/Spelling/Grammar

10 pts

Full Marks

Excellent APA formatting. references are relevant and recent [within 1-5 years]. No grammatical, spelling errors, graduate level writing demonstrated.

10 to >5.0 pts

Partial Marks [>5-9]

Rare APA errors, few grammatical errors, syntax; references, 5 years old [except where authorized]

5 to >0 pts

Few Marks

Does not adhere to APA format, uses references >6 years of age [except where authorized], numerous grammatical & spelling errors

10 pts

Total Points: 100

Requirements: Follow the rubric and answer the questions