Demonstrates an exceptionally high-level understanding of the dominant biomedical discourse in mental health.

CMH Assignment B Rubric

1- Criteria

Understanding of the biomedical discourse in mental health

Mark (25%)

Demonstrates an exceptionally high-level understanding of the dominant biomedical discourse in mental health. Critically and clearly considers the role of this discourse in the assessment, treatment and recovery from a particular diagnosis. Excellent integration of high-quality, evidencebased literature.

2- Criteria

Understanding of alternative discourses in mental health

Mark (25%)

An exceptionally clear and critical discussion is provided demonstrating an understanding of the impact of an alternative psychotherapeutic discourse for a particular diagnosis. Excellent integration of high-quality, psychotherapeutic literature.

3- Criteria

Comparison of the biomedical and alternative discourses in mental health

Mark (20%)

An exceptionally highquality, critical comparison is provided between the biomedical discourse in mental health and the competing psychotherapeutic discourse.

4- Criteria

Skills and compatibilities discussed.

Mark (20%)

A succinct and articulate discussion is provided which describes the mental health worker’s skills, attitudes and competencies required to engage therapeutically with the person.

5- Criteria

Presentation and structure

Mark (10%)

Clear, concise and logically structured with a succinct, clear introduction and cogent conclusion. Demonstrates professional use of writing mechanics to engage the intended audience.

Excellent academic writing style. It is very well organised and contains no spelling, grammar or referencing errors.

Excellent choice and integration of evidence. Adheres almost flawlessly to APA citing style.