Pediatric Chronic Illness Management Toolkit: Create a comprehensive toolkit that provides resources and strategies for managing chronic illnesses in pediatric patients, addressing topi

Criteria

Point Values

Details

Content Knowledge

Assessing the depth and accuracy of the group's understanding of the subject matter.

– Excellent

4

Thorough understanding demonstrated with comprehensive and accurate knowledge.

– Good

3

Solid understanding demonstrated with mostly accurate and well-presented information.

– Fair

2

Adequate understanding demonstrated with some inaccuracies or gaps in knowledge.

– Poor

1

Limited understanding demonstrated with significant inaccuracies or misunderstandings.

Visual Aid (Poster Board)

Evaluating the quality and effectiveness of the visual aid (poster board) presentation.

– Excellent

4

Visual aid is well-designed, organized, visually appealing, and enhances understanding.

– Good

3

Visual aid is clear, organized, and supports the content effectively.

– Fair

2

Visual aid is somewhat disorganized or lacks clarity in supporting the content.

– Poor

1

Visual aid is poorly designed, cluttered, or does not effectively support the content.

Peer-Reviewed References

Assessing the use of high-quality peer-reviewed references in the group's project.

– Excellent

4

Three or more peer-reviewed references are used appropriately and cited accurately.

– Good

3

Two or three peer-reviewed references are used effectively and cited correctly.

– Fair

2

One or two peer-reviewed references are used, but there may be some issues with citation.

– Poor

1

Limited or no use of peer-reviewed references, or significant issues with citation accuracy.

Presentation Skills

Evaluating the group's oral presentation skills, including clarity, organization, and delivery.

– Excellent

4

Presentation is clear, engaging, well-structured, and delivered with confidence and clarity.

– Good

3

Presentation is mostly clear, organized, and delivered with sufficient confidence and clarity.

– Fair

2

Presentation has some clarity and organization issues, and delivery may lack confidence.

– Poor

1

Presentation is unclear, disorganized, and lacks confidence and clarity in delivery.

Collaboration and Teamwork

Assessing the group's ability to collaborate effectively, communicate, and work as a team.

– Excellent

4

Strong collaboration and teamwork demonstrated, with effective communication and synergy.

– Good

3

Good collaboration and teamwork demonstrated, with effective communication and cooperation.

– Fair

2

Adequate collaboration and teamwork demonstrated, but with some communication or cooperation issues.

– Poor

1

Limited collaboration and teamwork, with significant communication or cooperation issues.

Overall Quality

Overall assessment of the project's quality, including content, visual aid, presentation, and teamwork.

– Excellent

4

Outstanding quality demonstrated across all criteria, with a cohesive and impressive project.

– Good

3

Good quality demonstrated overall, with strong performance in most criteria.

– Fair

2

Adequate quality demonstrated overall, with some areas needing improvement.

– Poor

1

Poor quality demonstrated overall, with significant deficiencies in multiple areas.