Conduct an Advocacy Analysis in which you will address advocacy and the role of the nurse in relation to a healthcare program’s design and implementation within your practice, or a healthcare organization.
For this Performance Task Assessment, you will conduct an Advocacy Analysis in which you will address advocacy and the role of the nurse in relation to a healthcare program’s design and implementation within your practice, or a healthcare organization.
Assessment Submission Length: Advocacy Analysis (4-6 pages)
Instructions
To complete this Assessment, do the following:
Reflect on the criteria provided in the rubric.
Download the Writing Checklist to review prior to submitting your Assessment
Assessment: Advocacy Analysis
Select a healthcare program within your practice or within a healthcare organization. Summarize the program, including costs and the project outcomes.
Describe the target population.
Explain the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program. Be specific and provide examples.
Describe the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program you selected.
How does this advocate’s role influence the design of the program? Be specific and provide examples.
Recommend at least two evaluation tools that are most appropriate for designing the healthcare program you selected.
Provide a justification for why you would recommend these evaluation tools.
Describe members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program you selected. Be specific and provide examples.
Explain the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation.
How is the role of the nurse different between design and implementation of healthcare programs? Be specific and provide examples.
Requirements:
Academic Writing Expectations Checklist
The faculty Assessor will use this checklist to evaluate whether your written responses adhere to the conventions of scholarly writing. Review this checklist prior to submitting your Assessment to ensure your writing follows academic writing expectations. Click the links to access Writing Center resources:
Sentence-Level Skills
Constructing complete and correct sentences
Note: See an explanation of and how to avoid .
Using and spelling words correctly
Note: See a list of and information on .
Using punctuation appropriately
Note: See the different types of and their uses.
Using grammar appropriately
Note: See a to catch further errors.
Paragraph-Level Skills
Using paragraph breaks
Note: See a description of .
Focusing each paragraph on one central idea (rather than multiple ideas)
Note: See an explanation of how work.
Use of Evidence
Using resources appropriately
Note: See examples of in a paper.
Citing and referencing resources accurately
Note: See examples of in a paper.
Paraphrasing (explaining in one’s own words) to avoid plagiarizing the source
Note: See .
Formatting Written Assignments
Using appropriate APA formatting, including title page, margins, and font
Note: See and from the Writing Center.
Comments:
Assessment InstructionsPA004: Design and ImplementationRS
Photo Credit: [Phil Roeder]/[Moment]/Getty ImagesReview the details of your assessment including the rubric. You will have the ability to submit theassessment once you submit your required pre-assessment and engage with your Faculty SubjectMatter Expert (SME) in a substantive way about the competency.OverviewFor this Performance Task Assessment, you will conduct an Advocacy Analysis in which you will addressadvocacy and the role of the nurse in relation to a healthcare program’s design and implementation withinyour practice, or a healthcare organization.Assessment Submission Length: Advocacy Analysis (4-6 pages)InstructionsTo complete this Assessment, do the following:Reflect on the criteria provided in the rubric.Download the Writing Checklist (/d2l/lor/viewer/viewFile.d2lfile/6722/3,-1/) to review prior to submittingyour Assessment.Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the same rubric the assessor willuse to evaluate your submission and it provides detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master theCompetency. Many students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the rubriccriteria help them direct their focus and use their time most productively.Achievement vs. Mastery of the CompetencyMastery of this Competency means that 80% or more of the rows have been assessed as ExceedsExpectations and no rows have been assessed as Does Not Meet Expectations.AchievementofthisCompetencymeansthatallrowsareassessedatMeetsExpectationsoraboveImportant Information on Interpreting the Assessment Rubric (click toexpand)
Achievement of this Competency means that all rows are assessed at Meets Expectations or above(but lower than the 80% threshold required for Mastery).Assessment of Individual Rubric RowsIn order to achieve Meets Expectations for a particular row of the rubric, you must have adequatelycompleted all criteria in that row. This means that you have addressed all required elements to therequired level of quantity and/or quality.In order to achieve Exceeds Expectations for a particular row of the rubric, you must have adequatelycompleted all criteria in the row, and in addition, your response must reflect a depth and breadth ofknowledge and expertise. Examples of this include—but are not limited to—the following:You provide additional, specific, and/or particularly relevant examples to illustrate points made.You seamlessly incorporate your original thoughts and diverse, credible, and relevant academicsources, when applicable, to express your viewpoint or develop a persuasive argument.You demonstrate a deeper understanding of the subject that draws from discipline-specificknowledge and theory and incorporates the viewpoints of a diverse set of business and managementthought leaders.You draw additional connections between multiple, complex topics to support your explanations.You are able to apply your knowledge in unique, creative, and/or innovative ways.You thoroughly break down concepts into simpler parts and use your understanding of business tomake connections.Your analysis is insightful and original.You design processes, products, and/or solutions that are creative, high-quality, and innovative.You consider diverse perspectives and relevant social, ethical, and business-related issues whenproposing new ideas or formulating judgments.RubricAll submissions must follow the conventions of scholarly writing. Properly formatted APA citations andreferences must be provided where appropriate. Submissions that do not meet these expectations will bereturned without scoring.This Assessment requires submission of one (1) document: a completed Advocacy Analysis. Save this fileas PA004_firstinitial_lastname (for example, PA004_J_Smith).You may submit a draft of your assignment to the Turnitin Draft Check (/d2l/home/23019) area to check forauthenticity. When you are ready to upload your completed Assessment, use the Assessment tab on thetop navigation menu. Important Note: As a student taking this Competency, you agree that you may be required to submityour Assessment for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. Allsubmitted Assessment materials will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com referencedatabase solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such materials. Use of the Turnitin.comiibjhUPlidhTiii
Reflect in ePortfolio service is subject to the Usage Policy posted on the Turnitin.com site.Assessment: Advocacy Analysis1. Select a healthcare program within your practice or within a healthcare organization. Summarize theprogram, including costs and the project outcomes.2. Describe the target population.3. Explain the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program. Be specific and provideexamples.4. Describe the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program you selected.5. How does this advocate’s role influence the design of the program? Be specific and provide examples.6. Recommend at least two evaluation tools that are most appropriate for designing the healthcare programyou selected.7. Provide a justification for why you would recommend these evaluation tools.8. Describe members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program you selected. Be specific andprovide examples.9. Explain the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation.Task: View this topic Activity Details
© 2020 Walden University 1 PA004: Design and Implementation: Analyze advocacy and the role of the nurse in healthcare program design and implementation. Assessment Rubric Rubric Criteria Does Not Meet Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Module 1: Healthcare Program Design Summarize the healthcare program that you selected, including the costs and the projected outcomes of this program. Learning Objective 1.1: Summarize healthcare programs Response does not include an adequate summary of the healthcare program. Response includes an adequate summary of the healthcare program, including the costs and the projected outcomes of the program. Response clearly and comprehensively summarizes the healthcare program, including the costs and the projected outcomes of the program. Describe the target population. Learning Objective 1.2: Describe target populations of healthcare programs Response does not adequately describe the target population of the healthcare program. Response adequately describes the target population of the healthcare program. Response accurately and thoroughly describes the target population of the healthcare program. Explain the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program. Be specific and provide examples. Learning Objective 1.3: Analyze the role of the Response does not adequately explain the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program. Response is not adequately specific. Response adequately explains the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program. Response is adequate in its specificity. Response accurately and comprehensively explains the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program. Response provides complete, thorough, and
© 2020 Walden University 2 Rubric Criteria Does Not Meet Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations nurse in program design Response does not provide adequate examples. Response provides adequate examples. explicit information that fully supports the accurate and comprehensive details provided. Response provides clear and comprehensive examples. Describe the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program you selected. Learning Objective 1.4: Describe the role of the nurse advocate for target populations of healthcare programs. Response does not adequately describe the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected. Response adequately describes the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected. Response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected. How does this advocate’s role influence the design of the program? Be specific and provide examples. Learning Objective 1.5: Analyze how the advocate’s role influences the design of Response does not adequately explain how the advocate’s role influences the design of the healthcare program. Response is not adequately specific. Response adequately explains how the advocate’s role influences the design of the healthcare program. Response is adequate in its specificity. Response clearly and comprehensively explains how the advocate’s role influences the design of the healthcare program. Response provides complete, thorough, and
© 2020 Walden University 3 Rubric Criteria Does Not Meet Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations healthcare programs Response does not provide adequate examples. Response provides adequate examples. explicit information that fully supports the accurate and comprehensive details provided. Response provides clear and comprehensive examples. Recommend at least two evaluation tools that are most appropriate for designing the healthcare program you selected. Learning Objective 1.6: Recommend appropriate evaluation tools for healthcare programs Response does not adequately recommend at least evaluation tools that are most appropriate for designing the healthcare program selected. Response adequately recommends at least two evaluation tools that are most appropriate for designing the healthcare program selected. Response accurately and clearly recommends at least two evaluation tools that are most appropriate for designing the healthcare program selected. Provide a justification for why you would recommend these evaluation tools. Learning Objective 1.7: Justify appropriate evaluation tools for healthcare programs Response does not adequately justify why you would recommend these evaluation tools. Response adequately justifies why you would recommend these evaluation tools. Response clearly and comprehensively justifies in detail why you would recommend these evaluation tools. Module 2: Healthcare Program Implementation
© 2020 Walden University 4 Rubric Criteria Does Not Meet Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Describe members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program you selected. Be specific and provide examples. Learning Objective 2.1: Describe members of a healthcare team needed to implement specific healthcare programs Response does not adequately describe members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected. Response is not adequately specific. Response does not provide adequate examples. Response adequately describes members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected. Response is adequate in its specificity. Response provides adequate examples. Response accurately clearly describes members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected. Response provides complete, thorough, and explicit information that fully supports the accurate and comprehensive details provided. Response provides clear and comprehensive examples. Explain the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation. Learning Objective 2.2: Analyze the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation Response does not adequately explain the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation. Response adequately explains the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation. Response clearly and comprehensively explains the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation. How is the role of the Response does not Response adequately Response accurately
© 2020 Walden University 5 Rubric Criteria Does Not Meet Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations nurse different between design and implementation of healthcare programs? Be specific and provide examples. Learning Objective 2.3: Analyze differences in the roles of the nurse in program design and in program implementation adequately explain how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs. Response is not adequately specific. Response does not provide adequate examples. explains how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs. Response is adequate in its specificity. Response provides adequate examples. and clearly explains in detail how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs. Response provides complete, thorough, and explicit information that fully supports the accurate and comprehensive details provided. Response provides clear and comprehensive examples. Professional Skills Assessment Professional Writing Professional Writing: Clarity, Flow, and Organization Content contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing does not demonstrate adequate sentence and paragraph structure and requires additional Content contains few spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates adequate sentence and paragraph structure and may require some editing. Content Content is free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is clear, logical, and well-organized.
© 2020 Walden University 6 editing/proofreading. Key sections of presented content lack clarity, logical flow, and/or organization. presented is satisfactorily clear, logical, and/or organized, but could benefit from additional editing/revision. Professional Writing: Context, Audience, Purpose, and Tone Content minimally or does not demonstrate awareness of context, audience, and/or purpose. Writing is not reflective of professional/scholarly tone and/or is not free of bias. Style is inconsistent with the professional setting/workplace context and reflects the need for additional editing. Content demonstrates satisfactory awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is mostly consistent with the professional setting/workplace context. Content clearly demonstrates awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free from bias, and style is appropriate for the professional setting/workplace context. Professional Writing: Originality, Source Credibility, and Attribution of Ideas Content does not adequately reflect original writing and/or paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates inconsistent adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and reference. There are numerous and/or significant errors. Content adequately reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates adequate adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. There are one or two minor errors. Content reflects original thought and writing and proper paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates full adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
