In the 5th century BCE, Athens was a cultural center of the day: a city-state capitalized by the arts, philosophy, and the sciences. The Athens of the 5th century was a city quite different from the one that would become famous under the same name in the subsequent centuries.
Introduction
In the 5th century BCE, Athens was a cultural center of the day: a city-state capitalized by the arts, philosophy, and the sciences. The Athens of the 5th century was a city quite different from the one that would become famous under the same name in the subsequent centuries. The Athenians were known for their intellectual pursuits and their oratory. The historical and cultural setting and more particular the architecture of Athens in the 5th century BCE is the subject of this essay. According to many literary works’ descriptions of Athens in the 5th century BCE, the city was still small and relatively poor, but it had achieved an “unexampled and incomparable dignity.” Even though Athens had the greatest reputation for its artistic and intellectual achievements, it still had a small population. Athens was a relatively rich and powerful city, in contrast to the rest of Greece, which suffered from poverty and civil war.
As of 2011, the City of Athens has a population of 664,046, with a land area of 38.96 km2 and a population of 664,046, making it the smallest administrative entity of the entire city (15.04 sq mi). With a populace of 3,090,508 people in 2011, the Athens Urban Area (also known as Greater Athens) extends beyond its formal municipal city limits, covering an area of 412 km2 (159 sq mi). Athens is also the warmest big European city and the southernmost capital on the European peninsula. The Acropolis, Hephaestus’ temple, the Roman Agora, and Dionysus’ stage are among the city’s cultural landmarks (“Greeka,” n. d.).
Historical and Geographical Background
The history of Athens and its culture in the 5th century BCE forms a fundamental component of the present essay. This period is generally considered the golden age of Athens’ history; its prosperity reached its zenith. The first half of the 5th century BCE saw Athens flourish under the rule of Peisistratus and his successors, with the country ruled by their family. The end of the decade saw the fall of the political power of the Peisistratids, which, however, was succeeded by a period of political instability and a shift of government to the Athenians. For the 5th century, Greece was dominated by the Macedonians, who ruled from 338 to 336 BCE. This era was marked when the Macedonians gained the upper hand over all of Greece, and the country was ruled in succession by members of the Alexander dynasty. Athens, however, retained its position as the leading city in Greece. The second half of the 5th century, however, was again marked by a deterioration in Athens’ fortunes: there was a collapse of the central government under the influence of a few tyrannical kings.
Throughout the history of Athens, there were two opposing tendencies: the conservative and the reformist. The conservative view, the prevailing view of the older literature, was that Athens remained a prosperous city and remained free and independent. This view saw Athens as a city that remained at the highest level of prosperity and prosperity when it was under a series of dictatorships in Greece. Although the view of the conservatives cannot be supported on the grounds of archaeological data, it is based on references from the literature and thus is a valid interpretation. The opposing view, that is, the reformist view, or, at least, the main part of the reformist view, that is, that Athens was at the lowest level of prosperity during this period and that the city was dominated by the “strong,” is supported by archaeological and historical data. This is partly because of the political upheavals of the period, with which the Athenians had to cope daily.
The geographical setting of Athens was mainly shaped by its natural landscape and sea, as can be seen from the topographical map of the region of Attica, the area of central Greece, which is dominated by a plateau of limestone. One important feature of the landscape of central Greece is the coastal strip along the sea, which is very narrow, in many places having widths of no more than a few meters. The city of Athens stands on a natural plateau. The surrounding land is flat or gently sloping, and in many places, the height of the land is low. The landscape, however, is varied: while the coast is mainly a limestone coast, there are also parts of Attica where there are many hills, some of which have heights of more than one hundred meters. Several different geological strata form this region. The city is not located on the “upper” or higher portion of the plateaus; on the contrary, the plateau itself forms the “upper” of the city. It is therefore also the highest point of the city. The main mountain chain in Attica is the Parnes range, which separates the plain of Attica from Boeotia and the Thessalian plain. These three areas constitute the “basin” of Attica, bordered by the eastern shore of the Saronic Gulf, which is the sea area to the east of the Attic coast. Thus, the city stands at the foot of Mount Parnes.
Ancient Greek Architecture and Construction
Greek architecture is essential to explore for various reasons, such as its logic and order (“Visual-act-cork,” n. d.). Greek architecture is based on logic and order. The Hellenes built their temples using a coded network of pieces based primarily on function and a well-thought-out artistic decorating scheme (“Visual-act-cork,” n. d.). Other reasons for exploring Greek cultural architecture are because it invents the classical orders and its influence on other schools or fields (“Visual-act-cork,” n. d.).
For the most part, people may take architecture for granted. Our everyday routines are all around us, often magnificent, occasionally shabby, but always present. How often do we inspect and consider its shape and style? Pausing for that reflection allows one to gain a better understanding of one’s ordinary environs and realize the relationship between contemporary architectural forms and those from the past. Architectural tradition and design have the power to connect divergent civilizations over time and distance, and the legacy of architectural forms developed by the ancient Greeks is no exception (“Khan Academy,” n. d.).
From antiquity onwards, Greek architects created some of the most beautiful and unique structures in the Ancient World. Some of their constructions, like temples, theaters, and stadia, would become staple elements of towns and cities (Cartwright, 2013). Furthermore, the Greek concern for simplicity, proportion, perspective, and harmony in their buildings influenced architects throughout the Hellenistic and Roman periods, laying the groundwork for the classical architectural orders that would dominate the western world from the Renaissance to the present day (Cartwright, 2013). And as if that wasn’t sufficient, the Ancient Greek architectural heritage, which arose during the Greek Classical Period, influenced European and Western culture and architectural forms long after the Greek Classical Period ended (Cartwright, 2013). Indeed, Greek architectural traditions would leave an everlasting imprint on European architecture, particularly that of the Roman Empire (Cartwright, 2013).
Some Historians argue that architectural elements in Greece date back to a very early period, with the early buildings of the 7th and 6th centuries BC being some of the earliest known examples of architecture in the world. The early Mycenaean Greeks built the earliest known temple in the 7th century BC, and Greek architecture was developed over the next 2,000 years and reached its height during the 5th and 4th centuries BC, which was when the Parthenon and the Erechtheion were built.
Architecture in Ancient Greece, which flourished during this period, was quite different from the Classical architecture we’re used to seeing. It’s generally agreed that Different architectural orders can describe ancient Greek architecture. The principal orders in archaic and classical Greek were the Doric and the Ionic (Hemingway, 2003). These two had a significant difference in the placement, shape, and proportion of the columns (“Encyclopedia,” 2018). The Doric and the Ionic orders were later joined by several other orders, the best known being the Corinthian and the Composite. Architectural orders such as the Doric and Ionic are easily recognizable today because of the capitals on their columns and entablature. In fact, in Greek architecture, a capital was considered the primary sculptural element and functioned to support and support the structure. That being said, capitals could vary in form and style, and the Corinthian capital, in particular, is one of the best known of all the Greek orders. The Doric capital perhaps occurs more frequently on the Greek mainland (Hemingway, 2003). Still, it was a significant contributor to the overall style and form of Ancient Greek architecture, and it would go on to have a huge impact on the design of Roman architecture.
While there are dozens of different Ancient Greek capitals, a particular element of Ancient Greek architecture that is easily identifiable is the frieze. Friezes were added to the architectural orders and were meant to add an artistic and decorative element to the building. These usually featured sculptures and geometric designs, and they were quite well known for their intricacy. That being said, the frieze was the feature that gave a building its artistic character rather than the actual structure.
Doric Style Architecture
Doric style architecture was an extremely important and influential Greek order. The Doric Order and its closely related variations are among the most well-known of all the architectural orders, and they were used throughout Greece and the Mediterranean. As was the case with most Ancient Greek orders, Doric-style architecture had a major influence on Roman architecture. The Doric order would play an important role in developing ancient Roman architecture. The Doric Order is based upon the Ancient Greek column, which consisted of a square column, usually built of stone and topped with a capital. Because of their strength and simplicity, columnar bases and capitals quickly became a key component of Doric-style architecture. Typically, the Doric columns are fluted, but there are many variations. There are even different types of fluting.
Doric columns are often associated with temples and other religious buildings, and their columns are often placed in an arc around a courtyard, which is where their name comes from. A Doric column could be seen as a structure that was hard and strong like the stones it was built from. This is, however, not the only reason why columns were popular in Doric style architecture, and in fact, the columns were often used for a variety of purposes, including decorative elements, columns within porticoes, and in other places. In ancient Greek society, columns were a mark of power, and the columns could often be seen as symbols of status or rank in society.
There is also a characteristic use of entasis in the Doric style, where the upper half of the capital curves outwards. This was not a purely aesthetic or stylistic feature and was an important structural feature in how the columns were built. It is believed that in the case of the Doric, the entasis created increased the strength of the base by taking some of the weight off the column.
Doric style architecture was very popular during the Classical Greek period, and its use would go on to be dominant in Greece and the wider Greek world for several centuries. The Doric architecture was dominant in Greece until the 5th century BC, when the temple at Athena had a Doric colonnade added to it. In Roman architecture, Doric style forms would remain popular until the end of the Empire, when they would fall out of use and be replaced by the Ionic order, which had a more flowing, fluid style to it.
Ionic Style Architecture
Ionic style architecture was another very well-known Ancient Greek order. The word ion resonates with an idea of a curved or flowing line and is used for various forms in the Classical Greek world. The ionic architecture was widely used in Greek houses, temples, and other buildings. The Ionic capital would be more complex than a Doric capital, featuring a more rounded or curving design and a volute. Two volutes rest atop a ring of palm-leaf decorations in Ionic capitals (Hemingway, 2003). The abacus is small, and unlike the Doric order, the entablature usually consists of three horizontal bars (Hemingway, 2003). The volutes of the Ionic capital also had a much more decorative purpose than in Doric style architecture, being used for various elements, including the frieze, pediment, and entablature. In Greek architecture, the use of volutes was highly symbolic, and the use of that form gave the capital a more decorative and decorative role in buildings.
A characteristic element of Ionic order is the use of volutes, which are undulations in the base which form a spiral pattern. Volutes are widely used in Ancient Greek architecture and are found in mostly Ionic-style buildings. The word volute is taken from the Latin word voluta and resonates with the idea of a winding spiral, which makes perfect sense, given the nature of the form.
In terms of the architectural orders, Ionic-style buildings are usually placed next to the Doric in the hierarchy and have much in common with Doric architecture. The capitals and columns of the Ionic order were often thought to be a little better than those of the Doric, and Ionic-style capital was often considered a more suitable choice. In Greek houses, the style of architecture was often dictated by the social class, so those in more elite classes might have Ionic-style buildings, while the more basic homes would be in Doric style. The Doric style was the traditional style of architecture, while Ionic became more fashionable and more prestigious. It is often said that the Ionic, rather than the Doric, became a more representative style during the Classical Greek period.
Public Buildings
The rectangular temple was the most ideally common and significantly known Greek public building architecture form. Buildings that took the rectilinear form are also commonly considered to contain styles of architecture used in the Mycenaean megaron. This megaron did have a porch, central throne room, and vestibule. Additionally, public buildings in Athens grew to be structured with gracious and dignified status. This is because the buildings are relative to each other architecturally. Also, every town in Greece at the time supposedly had an open-air theatre that was used to orchestrate public meetings and dramatic performances.
Architecture Materials
The Greeks are understood to fancy the use of marble in the construction of their public buildings. However, notably, the Greeks initially employed wood in their whole architectural construction. From the 7th century onwards, many Greeks had resulted to the full use of a mixture of wood and stone as they were the more durable materials then (“Art in Context,” 2021).
Fortifications
It is understood that the megalithic architecture (Cyclopean) signifies some trend in the Bronze Age architectural works. In particular, Mycenaean fortifications of this period are quite commonly known by an extensive populace. Despite the difficulty in the construction of these classical walls, there is evidence that Greeks built stone fortification walls in the primary millennium BCE. For instance, a series of Classical and Hellenistic walls made in ashlar masonry (squared masonry blocks) have been considered as a potential system of border fortifications in Attika.
Domestic Architecture
The end of the 5th BCE ushered in the new century that saw the rise of the fountain houses. These are just examples of the various domestic architectures that Ancient Greece has been attributed to (“Art in Context,” 2021). As such, Athens being a town in Greece, saw the rise of such. The structures themselves were modest, to say the least, and were used as gathering areas for water supplies and for people to socialize (“Art in Context,” 2021). Additionally, domestic dwellings were constructed with mud bricks and had their floor compacted with the earth – this shows how these dwellings were of simple design (“Art in Context,” 2021).
Conclusion
In conclusion, we have explored the intricacies of what the city of Athens was like in the 5th century BCE. In particular, we have seen the various architectural orders and elements that the ancient and classical Greeks had in Athens. Greek architecture as we have come to perceive was a significant influence on the Roman architecture and architects in profound ways. More so, an overview of basic building typologies demonstrates the range and diversity of Greek architecture.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
