Evaluate philosophical theories for their implications to the process of ethical decision making
What to Submit
The final project submission must be 6 to 8 pages in length (not including cover page and reference page) and written in full APA format. Use double spacing, 12‐point Times New Roman font, one‐inch margins, and discipline‐appropriate citations. Incorporate a minimum of four scholarly resources following APA guidelines for citations and listing references.In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:
Evaluate philosophical theories for their implications to the process of ethical decision making
Apply ethical principles to analyses of practical and classical dilemmas using appropriate philosophical concepts
Construct supporting and refuting arguments for the application of ethical decision‐making
Employ personal moral framework for effectively critiquing and defending ethical decisions
Prompt
This paper must be written in a scholarly manner using APA formatting and resources from the library and scholarly websites that end in .gov, .edu, .org, or .mil. Nothing will be accepted from open sources such as Wikipedia.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
Introduction: Compose an introduction that provides background information on the topic and premise of the ethical dilemma, its main arguments, and a summary of the evidence used to support the arguments.
Provide background on the dilemma. What subject is it addressing? What are all of the dimensions and sides to the dilemma? Why have you chosen this dilemma?
Briefly explain the evidence that supports the arguments. What evidence do they use to back up their arguments and support their claims? Is the evidence free from bias and assumptions? Does it successfully back up a coherent argument?
Evaluate a dilemma.
Analyze a dilemma by considering multiple dimensions and sides, using scholarly sources.
Discuss which ethical theories apply to your topic, using scholarly sources.
Use philosophical concepts appropriate to your analysis, referencing scholarly sources.
Present a clear explanation of all appropriate dimensions to the selected dilemma.
Form an argument regarding the dilemma using one or more ethical theories.
Apply ethical theories which are applicable to the dilemma, referencing scholarly sources.
Formulate how the ethical theories lend clarity to the dilemma.
Discuss which questions emerge from the use of the ethical theories.
Examine the limitations of the ethical theories to the dilemma.
Form a counterargument regarding the dilemma using one or more theories.
Apply ethical theories which contrast with the argument using scholarly sources.
Formulate how the ethical theories lend clarity to an opposing viewpoint in the dilemma.
Discuss which questions emerge from the counterargument and the application of contrasting ethical theories.
Examine the limitations of the opposing ethical theories to the dilemma.
Reflect personally on the dilemma.
Evaluate which ethical theories seem to be stronger or more compelling, explaining why.
Consider how this dilemma and the analysis affects both one’s professional and personal life.
Discuss whether or not this analysis changes a personal viewpoint or prior opinion.
If not, discuss how this analysis strengthens prior‐held beliefs.
Conclude with a brief description of known limitations from the analysis and dilemma
Requirements: 6-8 pages
Ethical Dilemma Part 2
Automated Technology- Genetic Engineering
Genetic engineering is a swiftly progressing domain with extensive potential for scientific advancements and ethical dilemmas. As my comprehension of genetics deepens and the technological capabilities expand, the capacity to modify the genetic code raises significant ethical queries and societal apprehensions that necessitate meticulous exploration and analysis. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive and profound examination of an ethical dilemma linked to genetic engineering, exploring the intricate network of ethical considerations, philosophical ramifications, and societal consequences it entails. By presenting comprehensive background information, examining diverse perspectives, exploring principal arguments, summarizing supporting evidence, and incorporating scholarly sources and ethical theories, this paper strives to offer a holistic understanding of the multifaceted aspects of this issue. Through this scrutiny, I can obtain valuable insights into the challenges faced by society as I navigate the boundaries and ethical implications of genetic engineering, paving the way for responsible decision-making and well-informed discussions.
The chosen ethical dilemma revolves around the genetic modification of human embryos. With the advent of cutting-edge technologies like CRISPR-Cas9, scientists now possess the ability to manipulate genes with unparalleled precision (Redman et al., 2016). Their conduct elicits profound ethical inquiries concerning the potential consequences and repercussions of modifying the genetic composition of forthcoming generations. The dilemma encompasses safety, consent, equity, and possible unintended outcomes. Exploring this ethical issue’s diverse dimensions and aspects is indispensable for conducting a comprehensive analysis.
Advocates of genetic engineering contend that it presents promising opportunities for preventing and treating genetic diseases. They cite scientific studies that demonstrate the potential to eradicate hereditary conditions and enhance individuals’ overall health and well-being. Proponents also underscore the potential to improve crop yield and address food scarcity, tackling global challenges. Furthermore, they argue that responsible implementation of genetic engineering can empower individuals to exert greater control over their genetic destinies. Nevertheless, it is vital to scrutinize the provided evidence meticulously. Conducting a comprehensive assessment of robust scientific research, peer review, and adherence to ethical principles is indispensable to guarantee the safety and efficacy of genetic engineering interventions. A comprehensive assessment of potential risks, unintended consequences, and long-term impacts is crucial for making informed decisions and guarding against undue harm.
Analysis of the Dilemma
Conducting a comprehensive analysis of the ethical dilemma surrounding genetic engineering entails considering multiple dimensions and perspectives. Scholarly references offer perspectives from various standpoints, encompassing bioethics, philosophy, jurisprudence, and social sciences (Nicholl, 2023). These sources enhance a nuanced comprehension of the ethical, societal, and legal implications associated with genetic engineering. Many ethical frameworks, such as consequentialism, deontological ethics, and bioethics, can be employed in this context. Consequentialism evaluates actions based on their outcomes, weighing potential benefits against harms. Deontological ethics emphasizes adherence to moral duties and principles, irrespective of consequences. Bioethical frameworks consider the broader social, cultural, and ethical implications of genetic engineering, aiming to ensure that decisions are made with respect for autonomy, justice, and beneficence. Exploring philosophical concepts like human dignity, personhood, and the precautionary principle can further enrich the analysis of this ethical predicament, providing frameworks for comprehending the ethical boundaries, intrinsic value, and responsibility associated with manipulating the human genetic code.
In conclusion, this paper has diligently examined an ethical predicament connected to genetic engineering, revealing the intricate considerations and far-reaching implications intertwined with the manipulation of genetic material. Through critical evaluation of the background, arguments, and evidence while incorporating ethical theories and philosophical concepts, a comprehensive understanding of the ethical challenges and profound societal impacts of genetic engineering has been achieved. Engaging in thoughtful and well-informed discussions involving stakeholders from diverse fields to responsibly navigate the ethical complexities of genetic engineering is critical. By undertaking such actions, we can guarantee that advancements in this field are accompanied by diligent, ethical deliberations, fostering the welfare of individuals and the collective society. Through continual dialogue and ethical introspection, we can mold the trajectory of genetic engineering in a way that harmonizes with our shared values and aspirations.
References
Redman, M., King, A., Watson, C., & King, D. (2016). What is CRISPR/Cas9? Archives of Disease in Childhood-Education and Practice, 101(4), 213–215.
Nicholl, D. S. (2023). An introduction to genetic engineering. Cambridge University Press.
Ethical Dilemmas of Automated Technologies: Challenges and Opportunities
Ethical Dilemmas of Automated Technologies: Challenges and Opportunities
Artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous systems have rapidly advanced automated technologies, creating complex moral difficulties that must be carefully considered. These moral quandaries affect how AI computers are programmed, how autonomous vehicles make decisions, and how robots are used in war. These problems create significant challenges with the responsible creation and application of automated technology, ranging from worries about biases in programming to conflicts resulting from morally conflicting choices. Investigating these moral conundrums offers critical new perspectives on the difficulties and possibilities posed by AI programming, autonomous vehicle decision-making, and using robots in the military (Bergmann, 2022). The ethical dilemmas surrounding automated technologies, including biases in programming, conflicts in decision-making algorithms, and the implications of deploying autonomous systems in military contexts, require careful consideration to ensure responsible development and deployment, mitigate potential harm, and uphold societal values.
Personal Interest in the Ethical Dilemma
As someone constantly intrigued by new technology developments, I have grown particularly interested in the moral ramifications of automated technologies. Numerous ethical issues have arisen due to the rapid development and deployment of AI systems and autonomous devices. It is essential to understand the ethical implications of these technologies to ensure responsible development and deployment that align with societal values and minimize possible harm (Bergmann, 2022). We can learn more about the upcoming ethical issues and prospects by investigating the moral conundrums related to AI programming, autonomous vehicle decision-making, and robot deployment in the military.
Potential Problems Related to the Ethical Dilemma
The moral conundrums raised by automated technologies are complex. Concerns about potential biases and discriminatory tendencies accidentally ingrained in the algorithms during AI programming have been raised. These biases can reinforce existing prejudices in the training data and perpetuate societal disparities if they are not addressed. Additionally, concerns about accountability and transparency are raised by the growing dependence on AI systems to make crucial decisions, such as hiring or criminal justice. Programming autonomous vehicles to respond to practical issues like avoiding pedestrians poses ethical dilemmas in the context of autonomous vehicles. Should autonomous vehicles prioritize their passengers’ safety over pedestrians’ safety, or should they take a more utilitarian stance to reduce overall harm? The morality of this choice involves complex issues regarding the worth of many human lives and the trade-offs involved. The killer robots used in warfare raise a unique set of moral dilemmas (Kochupillai et al., 2022). Determining who is responsible for activities that result in death makes it difficult to program robots with ethical considerations. Furthermore, programming biases may have unforeseen outcomes, such as disproportionate targeting or collateral damage. Consideration must be given to the moral ramifications of giving autonomous machines control over life-and-death situations.
Questions about the Ethical Dilemma
Various issues come up in examining the moral conundrums posed by automated technologies. First, how can we ensure that AI systems are taught to react morally to real-world situations? How can biases in AI algorithms be reduced and potential discriminatory actions mitigated? Also, what ethical issues and opportunities exist if AI outperforms human intelligence and capabilities? How do we ensure that the application of highly intelligent AI complies with human values and advances society? Whether utilitarian considerations should direct autonomous vehicles’ decision-making systems is debatable. How can we reconcile safeguarding passengers’ needs with reducing injury to pedestrians? Can models for making ethical decisions be created to deal with these dilemmas? How should we approach the programming of ethics in the context of the military employment of killer robots? Should robots be empowered to make decisions, or should they only be tasked with following predetermined rules of engagement? How can we deal with biases that can unintentionally be added to killer robot programming? These queries highlight the requirement for in-depth conversations on the responsible and moral application of autonomous technologies in military settings.
From an ethical standpoint, automated technologies offer potential as well as challenges. Essential tasks include addressing potential biases in AI programming, identifying ethical guidelines for autonomous vehicles, and thinking through the moral ramifications of using robots in warfare (Ramaswamy & Joshi, 2009). We can negotiate the moral conundrums of automated technologies by having deliberate conversations, creating transparent and responsible processes, and actively involving stakeholders. Collaboration between engineers, ethicists, policymakers, and the general public ensures responsible development and implementation (Ramaswamy & Joshi, 2009). Biases must be recognized and reduced, ethical norms and guidelines must be set, and the potential societal effects of automated technology must be carefully considered. By taking proactive steps, we may sculpt a future in which automated technologies are created and applied in a morally good way, beneficial to humanity, and helping create a more just and equitable society.
References
Bergmann, L. T. (2022). Ethical issues in automated driving—Opportunities, dangers, and obligations. User Experience Design in the Era of Automated Driving, 99-121.
Kochupillai, M., Kahl, M., Schmitt, M., Taubenböck, H., & Zhu, X. X. (2022). Earth Observation and Artificial Intelligence: Understanding emerging ethical issues and Opportunities. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 10(4), 90-124.
Ramaswamy, S., & Joshi, H. (2009). Automation and ethics. Springer Handbook of Automation, pp. 809–833.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
