Psychotropic Medication nonadherence among psychiatric patients
Psychotropic Medication nonadherence among psychiatric patients
Order Instructions
WEEK 10: ASSIGNMENT 2 ARTICLE CRITIQUE
Topic: Psychotropic Medication nonadherence among psychiatric patients using motivational interview
DNP graduates are expected to apply research findings and integrate nursing science into evidence-based practice. To develop your skills in this high level of nursing practice, you will analyze the strengths and weaknesses of a research study over the next several weeks using the concepts presented throughout the course. Your final analysis will be a 5- to 7-page paper that includes the following:
A brief, 1- to 2-paragraph overview of the quantitative study that you selected. FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT THE ARTICLE CANNOT BE A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Review the Walden University library information on a systematic review https://academicanswers.waldenu.edu/faq/145443Links to an external site.An explanation of two to three strengths of the study and support for your selection (i.e., why is this a strength). Be specific.An explanation of 2–3 weaknesses of the study and support for your selection (i.e., why is this a weakness). Be specific.Note: The strengths and weaknesses that you identified should be in relation to design, sampling, data collection, statistical analysis, results, and discussion of the study that you selected.An explanation of proposed changes you would recommend to improve the quality of the this quantitative study, capitalizing on the strengths and improving on the weaknesses that you identified in the study. Be specific and provide examples.A final summary of the implications of this study for nursing practice.The purpose of the analysis is to help you develop a deeper understanding of the research process, to inspire you to think critically and deeply about research on a specific topic, and to strengthen your ability to integrate research findings into evidence-based nursing practice. This Assignment also gives you practice in analyzing the research literature, which will support you when you begin your DNP project. Before you proceed, please review the rubric for this Assignment.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
THE ASSIGNMENT: (5–7 PAGES)Select a quantitative research article from the body of literature that you have reviewed related to the practice gap that you have identified and for which you will develop for your DNP Project.Review the various quantitative research designs presented in the textbook readings and research articles.Consider the research design used in your selected article. Ask yourself the following questions:Is the design appropriate for the study? Why or why not?Would a different design provide better results? Why or why not?Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632Links to an external site.). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
BY DAY 7Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 10.
SUBMISSION INFORMATIONBefore submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK10Assgn2+last name+first initial.Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
RubricNURS_8201_Week10_Assignment2_RubricNURS_8201_Week10_Assignment2_RubricCriteria Ratings PtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWrite a 1- to 2-paragraph overview of the study selected.25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and completely provides a detailed overview of the research study selected.22 to >19.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately provides an overview of the research study selected.19 to >17.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely provides an overview of the research study selected.17 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely provides an overview of the research study selected, or it is missing.25 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain two to three strengths of the study and support for your selection. Be specific.Explain two to three weaknesses of the study and support for your selection. Be specific.80 to >71.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly explains in detail two to three strengths of the study…. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail two to three weaknesses of the study…. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the strengths and weaknesses explained.71 to >70.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains two to three strengths of the study…. The response accurately explains two to three weaknesses of the study…. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the strengths and weaknesses explained.70 to >55.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains two to three strengths of the study…. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains two to three weaknesses of the study…. OR… The response explains <2 strengths and weaknesses…. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the strengths and weaknesses explained.55 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely explains two to three strengths of the study, or it is missing…. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains two to three weaknesses of the study, or it is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the strengths weaknesses explained, or it is missing.80 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain the proposed changes that you would recommend to improve the quality of the study. Capitalize on the strengths to improve on the weaknesses. Be specific and provide examples.100 to >89.0 ptsExcellentThe response comprehensively and fully explains, in detail, the proposed recommended changes to improve the quality of the study…. The response accurately and clearly analyzes, in detail, the strengths of the study, in the proposed changes, to capitalize on these strengths. … The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples to fully support the proposed changes.89 to >79.0 ptsGoodThe response explains the proposed recommended changes to improve the quality of the study…. The response analyzes the strengths of the study, in the proposed changes, to capitalize on these strengths. … The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the proposed changes.79 to >69.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains the proposed recommended changes to improve the quality of the study…. The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzes the strengths of the study, in the proposed changes, and may capitalize on these strengths. … The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the proposed changes.69 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely explains the proposed recommended changes to improve the quality of the study, or it is missing…. The response inaccurately and vaguely analyzes the strengths of the study, in the proposed changes, and does not capitalize on these strengths, or it is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the proposed changes, or it is missing.100 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWrite a final summary of the implications of this study for nursing practice.50 to >44.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly summarizes, in detail, the implications of this study for nursing practice…. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the summarized implications.44 to >39.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately summarizes the implications of this study for nursing practice…. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the summarized implications.39 to >34.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the implications of this study for nursing practice…. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the summarized implications.34 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the implications of this study for nursing practice, or it is missing…. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the summarized implications, or it is missing.50 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.15 to >12.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.12 to >10.5 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.10.5 to >10.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.10 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time…. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.15 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation15 to >12.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.12 to >10.5 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.10.5 to >10.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.10 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.15 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.15 to >12.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.12 to >10.5 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.10.5 to >10.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.10 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.15 ptsTotal Points: 300
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
