Briefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned, including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented. ? Based on the decisions you recommended
· INTRODUCTION
· Briefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned, including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented.
· Based on the decisions you recommended for the patient case study, explain whether you believe the decisions provided were supported by the evidence-based literature. Be specific and provide examples. Be sure to support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.
· What were you hoping to achieve with the decisions you recommended for the patient case study you were assigned? Support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.
· Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decision in the exercise. Describe whether they were different. Be specific and provide examples.
CONCLUSION
DECISION TREE FOR NEUROLOGICAL AND MUSCULOSKELETAL
Write a 3 page summary paper that addresses the following:
· INTRODUCTION
· Briefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned, including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented.
· Based on the decisions you recommended for the patient case study, explain whether you believe the decisions provided were supported by the evidence-based literature. Be specific and provide examples. Be sure to support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.
· What were you hoping to achieve with the decisions you recommended for the patient case study you were assigned? Support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.
· Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decision in the exercise. Describe whether they were different. Be specific and provide examples.
· CONCLUSION
Case scenario
BACKGROUND
This week, a 43-year-old white male presents at the office with a chief complaint of pain. He is assisted in his ambulation with a set of crutches. At the beginning of the clinical interview, the client reports that his family doctor sent him for psychiatric assessment because the doctor felt that the pain was “all in his head.” He further reports that his physician believes he is just making stuff up to get “narcotics to get high.”
SUBJECTIVE
The client reports that his pain began about 7 years ago when he sustained a fall at work. He states that he landed on his right hip. Over the years, he has had numerous diagnostic tests done (x-rays, CT scans, and MRIs). He reports that about 4 years ago, it was discovered that the cartilage surrounding his right hip joint was 75% torn (from the 3 o’clock to 12 o’clock position). He reports that none of the surgeons he saw would operate because they felt him too young for a total hip replacement and believed that the tissue would repair with the passage of time. Since then, he reported development of a strange constellation of symptoms including cooling of the extremity (measured by electromyogram). He also reports that he experiences severe cramping of the extremity. He reports that one of the neurologists diagnosed him with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), also known as reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD). However, the neurologist referred him back to his family doctor for treatment of this condition. He reports that his family doctor said “there is no such thing as RSD, it comes from depression” and this was what prompted the referral to psychiatry. He reports that one specialist he saw a few years ago suggested that he use a wheelchair, to which the client states “I said ‘no,’ there is no need for a wheelchair, I can beat this!”
The client reports that he used to be a machinist where he made “pretty good money.” He was engaged to be married, but his fiancé got “sick and tired of putting up with me and my pain, she thought I was just turning into a junkie.”
He reports that he does get “down in the dumps” from time to time when he sees how his life has turned out, but emphatically denies depression. He states “you can’t let yourself get depressed… you can drive yourself crazy if you do. I’m not really sure what’s wrong with me, but I know I can beat it.”
During the client interview, the client states “oh! It’s happening, let me show you!” this prompts him to stand with the assistance of the corner of your desk, he pulls off his shoe and shows you his right leg. His leg is turning purple from the knee down, and his foot is clearly in a visible cramp as the toes are curled inward and his foot looks like it is folding in on itself. “It will last about a minute or two, then it will let up” he reports. Sure enough, after about two minutes, the color begins to return and the cramping in the foot/toes appears to be releasing. The client states “if there is anything you can do to help me with this pain, I would really appreciate it.” He does report that his family doctor has been giving him hydrocodone, but he states that he uses is “sparingly” because he does not like the side effects of feeling “sleepy” and constipation. He also reports that the medication makes him “loopy” and doesn’t really do anything for the pain.
MENTAL STATUS EXAM
The client is alert, oriented to person, place, time, and event. He is dressed appropriately for the weather and time of year. He makes good eye contact. Speech is clear, coherent, goal directed, and spontaneous. His self-reported mood is euthymic. Affect consistent to self-reported mood and content of conversation. He denies visual/auditory hallucinations. No overt delusional or paranoid thought processes appreciated. Judgment, insight, and reality contact are all intact. He denies suicidal/homicidal ideation, and is future oriented.
Diagnosis: Complex regional pain disorder (reflex sympathetic dystrophy)
Decision Point One
Select what you should do:
A) Savella 12.5 mg orally once daily on day 1; followed by 12.5 mg BID on day 2 and 3; followed by 25 mg BID on days 4-7; followed by 50 mg BID thereafter.
(B). Amitriptyline 25 mg po QHS and titrate upward weekly by 25 mg to a max dose of 200 mg per day. (SELECTED ANSWER)
(C). Neurontin 300 mg po BEDTIME with weekly increases of 300 mg per day to a max of 2400 mg if needed.
RESULTS OF DECISION POINT ONE : with the selected answer above the client commented the below statement;
Client returns to clinic in four weeks. Client comes to the office still using crutches. He states that the pain has improved but he is a bit groggy in the morning. Client's pain level is currently a 6 out of 10. You question the client on what would be an acceptable pain level. He states, “I would rather have no pain but don’t think that is possible. I could live with a pain level of 3.” He states that his pain level normally hovers around a 9 out of 10 on most days of the week before the amitriptyline was started. You ask what makes the pain on a scale of 1-10 different when comparing a level of 9 to his current level of 6?” The client states, “I’m able to go to the bathroom or to the kitchen without using my crutches all the time. The achiness is less and my toes do not curl as often as they did before.” The client is also asked what would need to happen to get his pain from a current level of 6 to an acceptable level of 3. He states, “Well, that is kind of hard to answer. I guess I would like the achiness and throbbing in my right leg to not happen every day or at least not several times a day. I also could do without my toes curling in like they do. That really hurts.” Client denies suicidal/homicidal ideation and is still future oriented.
Decision Point Two
Select what you should do next:
(A ). Continue current medication and increase dose to 125 mg at BEDTIME this week continuing towards the goal dose of 200 mg daily. Instruct the client to take the medication an hour earlier than normal starting tonight and call the office in 3 days to report how his function is in the morning. (SELECTED ANSWER).
(B). Reduce the dose of Elavil to 75 mg at BEDTIME (dose has been titrated at weekly intervals by 25mg per week). Add on Biofreeze roll-on therapy to his right leg below the knee and into the foot and toes to be used as needed daily for muscle cramping.
(C). Reduce dose of amitriptyline Elavil to 75 mg po orally at BEDTIME and add- on Neurontin (gabapentin) 300 mg po orally at BEDTIME. Schedule a Ffollow-up phone call in 1 week to assess pain control.
RESULTS OF DECISION POINT TWO : with the selected answer above the client commented the below statement;
Client returns to clinic in four weeks The change in administration time seemed to help. The client states he is not as groggy in the morning and is able to start his day sooner than before. Client's current pain level is a 4 out of 10. He states that he is now taking 125 mg of amitriptyline at bedtime. Client's has noticed that he is putting on a little weight. When asked, the client states that he has gained 5 pounds since he started taking this medication. He currently weighs in at 162 pounds. He is 5’ 7”. He states that his right leg doesn’t bother him nearly as much as it used to and his toes have only “cramped up” twice in the past month. He states that he is able to get around his apartment without his crutches and that he has even started seeing someone he met at the grocery store. The weight gain seems to bother him a lot and he is asking if there is a way to avoid it
Decision Point Three
Select what you should do next:
(A). Continue with the Elavil at his current 125 mg a day dose and start Qsymia (phentermine and topiramate) 3.75 mg/23 mg tablet once daily and titrate as required by package insert.
(B). Reduce the dose of Elavil to 100 mg a day and follow up in a month.
(C). Continue the current dose of Elavil of 125 mg per day, refer the client to a life coach who can counsel him on good dietary habits and exercise. ( SELECTED ANSWER).
Guidance to Student
At this point, the client is almost at his goal pain control and increased functionality. Weight gain is a common side effect with amitriptyline and should be a counseling point at the initiation of therapy. He has a small weight gain of 5 pounds in 8 weeks. A reduction in dose may have an effect on the weight gain but at a considerable cost of pain to the client. This would not be in the best interest of the client at this point. Amitriptyline has a side effect of cardiac arrhythmias. He is not experiencing this at this point. The drug, qsymia contains a product called phentermine which has a history of causing cardiac arrhythmias at higher doses. This product is also only approved for a client with obesity defined as a BMI greater than 30 kg/m2. Your client’s BMI is currently 25.5 kg/m2. He does not meet the definition of obesity but is considered overweight. His best course of action would be to continue the same dose of Elavil, counsel him on good dietary and exercise habits and connect him with a life coach who will help him with this problem in a more meaningful way than a 10 minute counseling session will be able to accomplish.
RUBRIC for GRADING
Briefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned, including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented. Be specific. = The response accurately and thoroughly summarizes in detail the patient case study assigned, including specific and complete details on each of the three decisions made for the patient presented.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBased on the decisions you recommended for the patient case study, explain whether you believe the decisions provided were supported by the evidence-based literature. Be specific and provide examples. Be sure to support your response with evidence and references from outside resources. = The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence-based literature. … The response includes specific and relevant outside reference examples that fully support the explanation provided.
What were you hoping to achieve with the decisions you recommended for the patient case study you were assigned? Support your response with evidence and references from outside resources. = The response accurately and thorough explains in detail what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommend for the patient case study assigned. … The response includes specific and relevant outside reference examples that fully support the explanation provided.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain any difference between what you expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise. Describe whether they were different. Be specific and provide examples. = The response accurately and clearly explains in detail any differences between what they expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise. … The response provides specific, accurate, and relevant examples that fully support whether there were differences between the decisions made and the decisions available in the exercise.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.= Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. = Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. = Uses correct APA format with no errors.
,
Running head: Assessing and Treating Clients with Pain
Assessing and Treating Clients with Pain
NURS 6630: Psychopharmacologic Approaches to Treatment of Psychopathology
1
Managing care for patients with Pain 2
Introduction
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a chronic neuropathic pain that can occur
weeks to months after a bone injury (type I) or nerve injury (type II). The pathophysiology of
CRPS is attributable to the idea that when and an incident occurs, the brain and sympathetic
nervous system releases norepinephrine that causes vasoconstriction which leads to vessel spasm
and thus leads to pain and inflammation (Tajerian & Clark, 2016). The pain continues in the
same loop which causes chronic pain in the patient. Symptoms of CRPS include; burning pain
sensation, skin changes (redness, increase temperature, sweating, and edema) and decreased
range of motion (Goh, Chidambaram & Ma, 2017). Also, the patient can present with
psychological distress and can develop anger and mental illnesses such as depression. Diagnosis
of CRPS includes identifying clinical criteria and allodynia which is pain from stimuli that do
not typically cause pain and hyperalgesia where the patient has increased pain to a painful
stimulus. A sympathetic nerve block can be utilized as a diagnostic test as well as treatment for
CRPS. Other therapies for CRPS include the use of antidepressants, opioid analgesics and
physical therapy (Tajerian & Clark, 2016).
Summary of patient case
The patient is a 43-year-old white male who presents at the office with a chief complaint
of pain. He is assisted in his ambulation with a set of crutches. At the beginning of the clinical
interview, the client reports that his family doctor sent him for a psychiatric assessment because
the doctor felt that the pain was “all in his head.” He further reports that his physician believes
he is just making stuff up to get “narcotics to get high.” The patient reports that his pain began
about seven years ago when he sustained a fall at work. He states that he landed on his right hip.
Over the years, he has had numerous diagnostic tests done (x-rays, CT scans, and MRIs). He
reports that about four years ago, it was discovered that the cartilage surrounding his right hip
Managing care for patients with Pain 3
joint was 75% torn (from the 3 o’clock to 12 o’clock position). He reports that none of the
surgeons he saw would operate because they felt him too young for a total hip replacement and
believed that the tissue would repair with time. Since then, he reported the development of a
strange constellation of symptoms including cooling of the extremity (measured by
electromyogram).
The patient also reports that he experiences severe cramping of the extremity. He states
that one of the neurologists diagnosed him with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), also
known as reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD). However, the neurologist referred him back to
his family doctor for treatment of this condition. He reports that his family doctor said “there is
no such thing as RSD, it comes from depression,” and this was what prompted the referral to
psychiatry. He reports that one specialist he saw a few years ago suggested that he use a
wheelchair, to which the client states “I said ‘no,’ there is no need for a wheelchair, I can beat
this!”. The client reports that he used to be a machinist where he made “pretty good money.” He
was engaged to be married, but his fiancé got “sick and tired of putting up with me and my pain,
she thought I was just turning into a junkie.”
The patient reports that he does get “down in the dumps” from time to time when he sees
how his life has turned out but emphatically denies depression. He states “you can’t let yourself
get depressed… you can drive yourself crazy if you do. I’m not sure what’s wrong with me, but
I know I can beat it.” During the client interview, the client states “oh! It’s happening, let me
show you!” this prompts him to stand with the assistance of the corner of your desk, he pulls off
his shoe and shows you his right leg. His leg is turning purple from the knee down, and his foot
is clearly in a visible cramp as the toes are curled inward and his foot looks like it is folding in
on itself. “It will last about a minute or two; then it will let up” he reports. Sure enough, after
about two minutes, the color begins to return, and the cramping in the foot/toes appears to be
Managing care for patients with Pain 4
releasing. The client states “if there is anything you can do to help me with this pain, I would
appreciate it.” He does report that his family doctor has been giving him hydrocodone, but he
states that he uses “sparingly” because he does not like the side effects of feeling “sleepy” and
constipation. He also reports that the medication makes him “loopy” and doesn’t do anything for
the pain.
The patient is alert, oriented to person, place, time, and event. He is dressed appropriately
for the weather and time of year. He makes good eye contact. Speech is clear, coherent, goal-
directed, and spontaneous. His self-reported mood is euthymic. Affect consistent to self-reported
spirit and content of the conversation. He denies visual/auditory hallucinations. No overt
delusional or paranoid thought processes appreciated. Judgment, insight, and reality contact are
all intact. He denies suicidal/homicidal ideation (SI/HI) and is future-oriented. The patient is
diagnosed with Complex regional pain disorder (reflex sympathetic dystrophy). The purpose of
this paper is to present and discuss treatment options at three various levels in the management
of the patient’s pain symptoms. Also, the essay will include ethical considerations and practical
communication skills when caring for patients with pain disorders.
Decision 1
To begin treatment, the Psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner (PMHNP) can start
the patient on Savella 12.5mg orally once daily on day 1; followed by 12.5mg BID on day 2 and
3; followed by 25mg BID on days 4-7; followed by 50mg BID after that. The second option is to
begin Amitriptyline 25mg PO QHS and titrate upward weekly by 25mg to a maximum dose of
200mg per day. The third option is to start Neurontin 300mg PO at bedtime with weekly
increases of 300mg per day to a max 2400mg if needed. The PMHNP decides to start the patient
on Amitriptyline 25mg PO QHS and titrate upward weekly by 25mg to a maximum dose of
200mg per day. As a Tricyclic antidepressant, Amitriptyline is often used as first line treatment
Managing care for patients with Pain 5
for patients with chronic and neuropathic pain due to its norepinephrine and serotonin inhibition
which increases the amount of these neurotransmitters and therefore increases nociceptive
inhibition (Stahl, 2014).
Although Milnacipran (Savella) is effective in treating cases of fibromyalgia, research
shows no significant change in neuropathic pain control with this medication and side effects
especially at higher doses can cause bouts of sweating, and nausea and feeling of anxiety (Derry,
Phillips, Moore & Wiffen, 2015). Also, the PMHNP would not choose to start the patient on
Neurontin at this time for high chances of daytime drowsiness, sleepiness and decrease motor
function especially (Stahl, 2013) which may not be especially beneficial for this patient who
does not have much physical support and uses crutches for ambulation. The goal of treatment is
to attain a pain level at a 3-5/10 after initial treatment and minimize the use of crutches by 25%
in activities of daily living.
The patient returns to clinic in four weeks still using crutches. He states that the pain has
improved, but he is a bit tired in the morning. Client's pain level is currently a 6 out of 10. The
PMHNP questions the client on what an acceptable pain level would be. He states, “I would
rather have no pain but don’t think that is possible. I could live with a pain level of 3.” He states
that his pain level normally hovers around a 9 out of 10 on most days of the week before the
amitriptyline was started. The PMHNP asks what makes the pain on a scale of 1-10 different
when comparing a level of 9 to his current level of 6?” The client states, “I’m able to go to the
bathroom or the kitchen without using my crutches all the time. The achiness is less, and my toes
do not curl as often as they did before.” The client is also asked what would need to happen to
get his pain from a current level of 6 to an acceptable level of 3. He states, “Well, that is kind of
hard to answer. I would probably like the achiness and throbbing in my right leg to not happen
every day or at least not several times a day. I also could do without my toes curling in as they
Managing care for patients with Pain 6
do. That hurts.” Client denies SI/HI, and he is still future-oriented. The outcome is as expected
because although Elavil is effective in controlling neuropathic pain, the onset is delayed, and the
patient was started on minimum dose with ample room to titrate the mediation until a therapeutic
effect is seen.
Decision 2
Based on the outcomes form the first treatment option, the PMHNP can continue the
medication and increase the dose to 125mg QHS this week maintaining towards the goal dose of
200mg daily. Also, instruct the client to take the pill an hour earlier than normal starting tonight
and call the office on three days to report how his function is in the morning. The second choice
will be to reduce the dose of Elavil to 75mg at Bedtime and add on Biofreeze roll-on therapy to
his right leg below the knee and into the foot and toes to be used as needed daily for muscle
cramping. The third option is to reduce the dose of amitriptyline to 75mg PO at bedtime and add
on Neurontin 300mg PO at night then schedule a follow-up call in 1 week to assess the patient’s
pain control. The PMHNP decides to continue the medication and increase the dose to 125mg
QHS this week maintaining towards the goal dose of 200mg daily. Also, the PMHNP will
instruct the client to take the medication an hour earlier than normal starting tonight and call the
office on three days to report how his function is in the morning.
Elavil has a strong serotoninergic action for which is it frequently prescribed for nerve
damage/neuropathic pain (Moore, Derry, Aldington, Cole & Wiffen, 2015) and this patient
appears to have some control of his pain while on this medication thus titrating up the dose can
be beneficial for him. Although Neurontin functions to reduce neurotransmitters release such as
glutamate and thus beneficial for neuropathic pain, this medication can increase drowsiness
especially during the day time (Stahl, 2014). Moreover, the Elavil appears to be helping the pain
control; thus, it would not be recommended to decrease the dose instead. Thirdly, Biofreeze
Managing care for patients with Pain 7
which contains menthol that works by desensitizing nociceptors which can help with muscle
cramping and pain but this regime requires frequent application thus is not a suitable for a long-
term solution for this patient with chronic pain (Studies from J.V, 2018). The goal at this point is
for the patient’s pain level to be tolerable at 3 or less and a decrease by 60% or more of the use
of crutches and alleviate achiness/throbbing in right leg and curling of toes by the next
appointment.
The patient returns to the clinic in four weeks stating the change in administration time
seemed to help. The client also says he is not as tired in the morning and can start his day sooner
than before. He reports his current pain level is a 4 out of 10 with the current treatment. The
patient has noticed that he is putting on a little weight. When asked, the client states that he has
gained 5 pounds since he started taking this medication. He currently weighs in at 162 pounds.
He is 5’ 7”. He states that his right leg doesn’t bother him nearly as much as it used to and his
toes have only “cramped up” twice in the past month. He states that he can get around his
apartment without his crutches and that he has even started seeing someone he met at the grocery
store. The weight gain seems to bother him a lot, and he is asking if there is a way to avoid it.
With the increased dose in Elavil, the outcome is as expected since the patient is reporting lesser
pain rating, improving in physical and social status (antidepressant property of Elavil) and a
decrease in previous negative muscle symptoms. Also, small- moderate weight gain can be
anticipated with patients when on Elavil (Stahl, 2013).
Decision 3
At this level in treatment, the PMHNP can continue with the Elavil at his current 125mg
a day dose and start Qysmia 3.75mg/23mg tablet oral once and titrate as required by package
insert. Another choice is to reduce the dose of Elavil to 100mg a day and follow up in a month.
The third choice is to continue the current treatment of Elavil of 125mg per day and refer the
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.