What baby formula do pediatricians prefer most to build newborn babies’ brains and immune systems while the baby is in the neonatal intensive care unit (NI
Approved Problem Statement/ Topic: What baby formula do pediatricians prefer most to build newborn babies' brains and immune systems while the baby is in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) that is born prematurely at earlier than 37 completed weeks?
BUSI 600
Research Proposal: Final Assignment Instructions
The purpose of the Research Proposal: Final Assignment is to ensure you appreciate the challenge of setting up an effective research plan, consider the context, research questions, sources, timeline, integrated implications, analysis, and writing required. Building a proposal will demand you work through all the research stages explored throughout the course including: clarifying the research question; designing the research; reviewing relevant scholarly literature, data collection, preparation and examination; analyzing the data; and reporting on the research.
Using the Research Proposal: Topic Assignment that has been approved, build a comprehensive research proposal on that topic.
Approved Problem Statement/ Topic: What baby formula do pediatricians prefer most to build newborn babies' brains and immune systems while the baby is in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) that is born prematurely at earlier than 37 completed weeks?
The Research Proposal: Final Assignment should use the following outline/structure and follow the suggested quantity of content for each element:
· Title – clear, concise and well-defined to explain your research question.
· Executive Summary – short summary of 100-250 words that includes the research question, hypothesis of your research, the research methodology and findings.
· Introduction (>200 words) – provide a background or context related to your research problem. It should include the purpose, background, significance, issues, variables and hypothesis.
· Problem statement (< 100 words) – clearly state the specific problem down to something that is researchable. Present it in a thesis statement and a hypothesis. Explain the management research question hierarchy for the problem.
· Literature Review (1000-1300 words) – conduct extensive background research and support your research question with ample proof from scholarly, peer reviewed sources. credible sources and research. There is additional help on literature reviews below in the section titled Additional Help.
· Importance/Benefits of the Study (>250 words) – describe the explicit benefits
· Research Design (>400 words) – explains the phases of the research, sampling design, participants, data collection design, instruments, procedures, ethical requirements, etc.
· Nature and Form of Results (>250 words) – explain the anticipated form for the results to include the types and format of data to be presented for the expected audience.
· Budget (>150 words) – summary of costs and expenses necessary to conduct the research.
· Schedule (>150 words) – summarize the major phases, timelines, milestones and primary deliverables.
· Ethical considerations (>200 words) – must carefully consider data collection processes and participant rights.
· Implications and considerations (>200 words) – identify at least 2 implications and 2 limitations of the proposed study.
· References
Resources:
· Beginning the research process: https://watch.liberty.edu/playlist/details/1_g7lv1vh8/categoryId/74370641?_gl=1*laf48t*_ga*OTk2NDc1NjUuMTY3NjM4MDcyOQ..*_ga_YK8WH8QD6R*MTY4NzkwNTY1OC4xNDcuMS4xNjg3OTA1NzM0LjUwLjAuMA..&_ga=2.168085921.1088430991.1687469627-99647565.1676380729
· Literature Reviews: An Overview for Graduate Students: https://www.lib.ncsu.edu/videos/literature-reviews-overview-graduate-students
· Sample literature review: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0149206309347376
·
Ensure the following requirements are met:
· Follow the outline, content structure and length provided in the assignment instructions
· At least 3,000 words (excluding the title page and references pages)
· Reference at least 10 scholarly (peer reviewed) research articles. For assistance on how to identify scholarly sources, refer to the Liberty University Research Portal tutorials (see Resources section).
· Use proper grammar, current APA format and submit in MS Word format.
The Research Proposal: Final Assignment does not require an abstract or Biblical integration.
Do not reuse work from any previous courses you have taken.
Paraphrasing vs. Plagiarism
Some students do not fully understand the difference between plagiarism and paraphrasing. Paraphrasing is when you take a source or someone else’s idea and say it in your own words. When you paraphrase, you must still give the author’s name, date, title of the source, the scholarly journal it came from, and the exact website address or book.
Due to the nature of a research proposal, you should have less than 100 words of quotation. When you directly quote a source, it must have quotation marks around the quote, or (if 40 words or more) it must be set in block quotation format. Using APA style citations provide detailed information of where you acquired the quote.
For the purpose of this academic paper, adhere to the following rules when quoting or using a source:
· Do not directly quote more than 30 words from any 1 source.
· If the source is 2,000 words or less, do not directly quote more than 25 words from the source.
· When quoting or paraphrasing, do not use the same source more than 3 times within the whole document.
· Quotes must follow APA style and contain the section (if provided) and paragraph or page numbers of the quote.
· In all instances, use current APA guidelines for citations and references.
The literature review portion of the Research Proposal: Final Assignment must not be a series of quotations and you must explain the quotation relevance/application to your proposal. Because of this, paraphrasing is preferred to quotation since it demands an understanding of the material. You may email your instructor with any questions regarding the Research Proposal: Final Assignment.
Additional Help
Schindler’s (2019) chapter 17 provides a good orientation to all the elements of research and Schindler’s (2019) appendix a provides a solid orientation to the research proposal.
You should examine a couple published literature reviews so you can familiarize yourself with what a literature review is and how it is set up. Below are 2 published literature reviews from the Jerry Falwell Library databases that will help you understand the literature review portion of the research proposal assignment (see Resources section for links).
Morgeson, F. P., DeRue, D. S., & Karam, E. P. (2010). Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management, 36(1), 5–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309347376
Stewart, G. L., Courtright, S. H., & Manz, C. C. (2011). Self-leadership: A multilevel review. Journal of Management, 37(1), 185–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310383911
For assistance on how to identify scholarly sources, refer to the Liberty University Research Portal tutorials (see Resources section) on Defining Databases and Journals.
View the Research Proposal: Final Resources section under the Research Proposal: Final page.
Page 1 of 2
,
Criteria Ratings Points
Content – Topic Coverage – Title, Executive Summary, Introduction, Problem Statement, Management Dilemma, Research Question(s) & Import ance/Significance
50 to >44 pts
Advanced
Thoughtful, detailed and comprehensive su mmary/introduction/pro blem statement/manag ement dilemma/research question(s) are presented. Importance/ Significance are specifically related to previous research. The topic is clearly organized, presented and discussed in detail. Demonstrates exceptional depth of knowledge of the topic. Comprehensive use of most recent and seminal sources. Clearly discriminates among seminal sources.
44 to >38 pts
Proficient
Discussion relates sum mary/introduction/probl em statement/manage ment dilemma/research question(s) to previous research on topic. Discussion relates importance/significance to previous research and prevents implications. The topic is organized, presented and discussed appropriately. Demonstrates proficient knowledge of the topic. Thorough selection of sources pertinent to topic. Shows some discrimination among seminal sources.
38 to >0 pts
Developing
Limited summary/introd uction/problem statement/management dilemma/research question(s) with some comparison to previous research. The importance/significance is unclear or fairly clear but discussed too broadly or does not meet expectations. Demonstrates a basic knowledge of the topic. Selected sources relevant to topic. Limited discrimination among seminal sources.
0 pts
Not Present
50 pts
Content – Research Design, Nature/Form of Results, Budget, Schedule, Ethical Considerations
45 to >42 pts
Advanced
The research design takes a clearly critical, contextualized and possibly creative stance on the topic from multiple perspectives. The work carefully examines the research design, budget, schedule ethical assumptions and results.
42 to >36 pts
Proficient
The research design takes a clearly critical stance on the topic from multiple perspectives. The work explores the research design, budget, schedule ethical assumptions and results.
36 to >0 pts
Developing
The research design somewhat critically addresses a focus in cited literature. The work considers the research design, budget, schedule ethical primarily from a single perspective, with minimal exploration of assumptions.
0 pts
Not Present
45 pts
Content – Literature Review – application of Scholarly Research
45 to >43 pts
Advanced
Accurately identified and applied more 10 scholarly (peer reviewed) sources.
43 to >36 pts
Proficient
Accurately identified and applied at least 9 scholarly (peer reviewed) sources.
36 to >0 pts
Developing
Accurately identified and applied between 1 – 8 scholarly (peer reviewed) sources.
0 pts
Not Present
45 pts
Research Proposal: Final Grading Rubric | BUSI600_B01_202330
Criteria Ratings Points
Structure – Mechanics
20 to >17 pts
Advanced
0-1 grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly and consistently. Writing is precise. Word choice is appropriate. Includes clear transitions and systematic use of headings and subheadings.
17 to >16 pts
Proficient
2-3 grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly. Writing style is sufficient. Word choice is adequate. Includes transitions, headings, and subheadings.
16 to >0 pts
Developing
4-10 grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used inconsistently. Writing style is understandable but could be improved. Word choice is generally good. Limited use of transitions and/or logical headings.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Structure – APA Style 20 to >17 pts
Advanced
Citations and format are in current APA style. Cover page and References are correctly formatted. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font. Paragraphs are indented ½”.
17 to >16 pts
Proficient
Citations and format are in current APA style with few errors. Cover page and References are present with few errors. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font.
16 to >0 pts
Developing
Citations and format are in current APA style though several errors are present. Cover page and References are included though several errors are present. Paper is double-spaced, but margins or fonts are incorrect.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Structure – Paper Length
20 to >17 pts
Advanced
Submitted more than 3,000 words excluding the title page, abstract and references.
17 to >16 pts
Proficient
Submitted between 2,800 – 2,999 words excluding the title page, abstract and references.
16 to >0 pts
Developing
Submitted between 2,500 – 2,799 words excluding the title page, abstract and references.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Total Points: 200
Research Proposal: Final Grading Rubric | BUSI600_B01_202330
,
Personality Assesment
Students name
School of ,
Author Note
I have no known conflict of interest to disclose.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to . Email:
Abstract
Studies show that there are sixteen work personalities. Those personalities are known as the type of table, which the Publisher wrote, Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc. Palo Alto, Ca 94303. It shows how important it is to know identify your work type for a healthy, happy, and fulfilled work environment for yourself and others.
Keywords:
2
PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT 2
Introverts, extroverts, sensors, intuitive
Personality Assessment
Part 1: Jung and Briggs Myers personality results analysis
My personality test based on Jung and Briggs Myers typology indicated that I have an INTJ (introverted (38 percent), Intuitive (19 percent), thinking (6 percent), and judging (25 percent) type of personality. My results indicate that I have a moderate preference for introversion over extroversion. I have a slight preference for intuition over sensing, a slight preference for thinking over feeling, and a mild preference for judging over perceiving. As INTJ, my primary mode of living is known to be focused intrinsically; I take things and decisions based on my intuition. My secondary way of living is external, where I deal with situations rationally and logically. INTJ is known as masterminds; they live in a world of ideas and plan strategically rather than following their emotions. I value competence, intelligence, and knowledge as an INTJ person, and I have similar expectations to other people I work with currently and in the past. Since I am more of an introvert, I channel my energy into observing the world to generate potential ideas and possibilities which may turn out to be innovative. According to David Keirsey, a psychologist, and developer of the Keirsey Temperament Sorter, nearly 1 to 4 percent of the world's population has an INTJ personality type. Keirsey's four temperaments are better known as their subdivided sixteen kinds of personalities. The four-character types, according to Keirsey. The sixteen personality types include guardians, Artisans, Rationales, and Idealists; there are four personality types (Daniel, 2017).
I-introverted
Because I am more introverted at 38 percent, I am less likely to interact with others and share my ideas. I spend much of my time on my mind thinking about new ideas and how to plan strategically. As a result, I usually have little interest in the thoughts and feelings of other people.
Therefore, other people will perceive me as a reserved person who is often isolated and less likely to share ideas. However, I am open to welcoming ideas from other people that I perceive as critical and logical since my primary focus as an INTJ person is to uncover innovations. As an introvert, I prefer working by myself ad strongly prefer solo work to group work. People find it hard to know me because I see little value in social events such as partying and small talk and thus making it difficult for people to get to know me. As a result, I have reserved interaction with a small circle of friends and family members.
A person with INTJ personality traits tends to have difficulty establishing intimate solid relationships. I find it hard to show affection to other people. I do not feel the need to express appreciation to other people. People in a romantic relationship with an INTJ person may feel as they are not loved due to the type rarely showing respect. They are less likely to give positive support and praise as other partners desire, which I know significantly demonstrates in my personality (Daniel, 2017). I do not find it necessary to keep praising my partner, and I rarely use words of affirmation to other people, which makes them think that I am not romantic. In terms of career, I have great interest and passion in pursuing what I live to become more skilled and knowledgeable in my field of study. I have high expectations, and I see it as my responsibility to become the better version of myself.
I -Intuitive
Based on the personality test, my score for intuition was 19 percent. As an intuitive person, I slightly prefer intuition over sensing. I tend to rely on imagination on the potential outcomes rather than sense. I am more focused on tangible facts and more specific results. I tend to discuss and assess different views and options of what the world would look like in the future. I am interested in the future rather than the current moment. For example, I would like to think of where I will be in five years and how that will influence my personal and professional growth. In addition, I tend to exercise my imagination to seek new ideas and possibilities.
T-thinking
I have a slight preference for thinking over feeling. According to Keirsey's four temperaments, my INTJ personality falls under the rational category as a mastermind. Masterminds are planners, self-confident, systematic, utilitarian, willful, and ingenious (Keirsey, n.d). Under planning, they understand the logical outcomes of each move, and their decisions do not influence by the current situation but the consequences of the action. They quickly understand how a particular decision affects the next step. They foresee what will be the outcome of the present action. In addition, masterminds are self-confident and thus quickly make decisions because they believe in their intuitions and knowledge. When it comes to making decisions, I rarely waste time because I am self-confident that I am making the right decision. I have unparalleled certainty of my ability to overcome barriers and achieve excellent outcomes.
Furthermore, INTJ's personality confronts challenges head-on and acts as a stimulant for the mastermind to dig deep to uncover innovations. INTJ personality follows a systematic approach to a problem. In addition, a mastermind believes that every situation exists for a reason, and thus every issue must have a solution. They are interested in using ideas and their utility in reality, not merely concerned about the pictures.
NTS value knowledge and competence over everything else and seek to make sense of the world around them so that they can help improve it. However, they are not generally interested in taking care of details but instead are focused on seeing the big picture, discovering ideas, and recognizing patterns. Other people may find a person with an INTJ personality as a rigid person because they are committed to implementing their ideas. Other people may find it hard to understand a person with an INTJ personality.
J- Judgment
From the personality test, I score 25 percent in judgment. This score implies that I prefer judging over perceiving. For example, I like gathering information from the external world and analyzing it to gather new insights to make informed judgments rather than perceiving a situation.
Part 2: Relationship of various personality types at work
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is a practical framework that shows how different personality types work together. A workplace cannot be effective with too many people sharing the same personality. The workplace will not be effective because there are too many of the same character traits, and they do not benefit from different input from people with other character traits. For example, INTJ people are all rational masterminds and not input from a person with ISTP personality traits. An organization with an accurate mixture of different personalities will perform better if it has idealists, rationalists, guardians, and artisans. All these personality types interact to bring out the best results. For example, ENFP personality types are regarded as imaginative motivators, while ENSTJ personality types are considered efficient organizers (Thompson, 2022). As a result, a company needs efficient organizers and creative motivators to perform to its full potential. If an organization only has employees with ESTJ personality type, it will have a workforce full of efficient organizers.
However, unfortunately, it will be missing employees with ENFP personality types who are imaginative motivators. Different personality types bring various talents and ensure the team generates a broad spread of ideas and solutions. However, with team members having diverse personality traits can be hard to synchronize the differences into something that can work for the better of the company. However, it is not impossible if all team members respect the boundaries of others. For example, if a person is an introvert and prefers email, approaching their workstations may make them uncomfortable (Kroeger, Thuesen & Rutledge, 2009). It is also imperative to come to people with different personalities in different ways. For example, guardian types prefer facts and patience. Therefore, it is essential to approach the points and have plenty of time for them to make decisions.
Based on the personality test results, I have learned the impacts that my personality type, both positive and negative, can have on an organization. One of the traits I have a person with an INTJ personality type is that I can easily make a decision because I can project the future outcomes, and thus, I am confident with the decision I make. I can predict how the future will unfold, and therefore, I can make strategic decisions for an organization that will place the company in a better position. As a mastermind, I am driven to achieve the result and always watch the long-term consequences of a given action. Therefore, I am now better positioned to avoid decisions that may have adverse outcomes for an organization. INTJs are about strategy, and organizations are about strategic planning. As an INTJ, one of my biggest strengths is strategy. I approach situations in terms of problem-solving by looking at the bigger picture and the outcome of a given case. Businesses miss out because of a lack of visionary leaders who can strategize effectively (Kroeger, Thuesen & Rutledge, 2009). In addition, as an INTJ, I am independent and have self-confidence about myself. Self-confidence helps a leader take more bold moves that can take the organization far ahead. However, one of the weaknesses of INTJs is that they like working in solitary; this can be a disadvantage, especially for projects that require teamwork. I prefer working on projects alone. However, it can be hard when I am supposed to team with other employees to complete a task.
References
Kroeger, O., Thuesen, J. M., & Rutledge, H. (2009). Type talk at work (revised): How the 16 personality types determine your success on the job. Delta.
Thompson, J. (2022). How to work with all the Myers-Briggs personality types. https://www.atlassian.com/blog/leadership/every-myers-briggs-personality-type
Keirsey. (n.d). Learn about the rational mastermind. https://keirsey.com/temperament/rational- mastermind/
Daniel. (2017). Keirsey temperaments. https://www.personalityclub.com/blog/keirsey- temperaments/
,
SAMPLE APA-7 PAPER FOR GRADUATE/DOCTORAL STUDENTS 1
Created by Christy Owen of Liberty University’s Online Writing Center
[email protected]; last date modified: November 7, 2021
Sample APA Paper: Professional Format for Graduate/Doctoral Students
Claudia S. Sample
School of Behavioral Sciences, Liberty University
Author Note
Claudia S. Sample (usually only included if author has an ORCID number)
I have no known conflict of interest to disclose.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Claudia S. Sample.
Email: [email protected]
SAMPLE APA-7 PAPER FOR GRADUATE/DOCTORAL STUDENTS 2
Table of Contents
(Only Included for Easy Navigation; Hyperlinked for Quick Access)
Sample APA Paper: Professional Format for Graduate/Doctoral Students ……………………………… 6
Basic Rules of Scholarly Writing ……………………………………………………………………………………… 7
Brief Summary of Changes in APA-7 ………………………………………………………………………………… 8
Running Head, Author Note, and Abstract …………………………………………………………………………. 9
Basic Formatting Elements ……………………
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.