Performance Improvement in Health Care? Assignment Content- Project Now that you have studied multiple aspects of quality improvement (QI), it is your opportunity to develop a story
Performance Improvement in Health Care
Assignment Content- Project
Now that you have studied multiple aspects of quality improvement (QI), it is your opportunity to develop a storyboard display. This will be a depiction of a QI project that you may have been involved with or a hypothetical one. Please do not use the actual names of any existing facility. It is to be completed in a powerpoint format and shall follow the PDSA methodology to represent the QI team's efforts. I have uploaded multiple sample storyboards and PDSA documents in this folder.
-APA Format
– In addition please have notes on the side for a collaborate for present your storyboard and explaining.
Quality improvement storyboard
What is a QI storyboard? How to create a QI storyboard Template and guidance Examples More information
What is a QI storyboard?
A quality improvement storyboard is typically a brief, one-page, visual summary of a completed quality improvement initiative. The storyboard highlights key aspects of a quality improvement effort by documenting the project from beginning to end. It generally includes a description of the following: the problem, the methodology and QI tools used, key metrics, lessons learned and the plan for sustaining improvement. A QI storyboard includes steps taken within the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycle.
How to construct a QI storyboard
The format for a storyboard can vary. Templates are often used that follow the PDSA cycle. However, use of a template is not required. The design can be original using a preferred software program (MS Word, Publisher, PowerPoint, etc.).
Consider the following optional sections and content for a storyboard, which can consist of a combination of narrative and images:
Heading
· Agency name
· Agency logo
· Project title
· Project start and end date
· Names of sponsor and team members
· Team photo
Plan
· Problem/Issue
· Scope
· Project goals
· Current state process
· Root cause analysis
· Current state observations
· Strategies/improvement theories
Do
· Activities/plan to address the problem
· Rapid cycle improvements, testing details
Study
· Analysis of testing
· Observations of changes compared to expectations
Act
· Decision to adopt, adapt or abandon
· Rationale for decision
· Sustainment plan for improvements realized
Template and guidance
Quality improvement storyboard template (PPT) Minnesota Dept. of Health
QI storyboard quick guide video (15:07) Minnesota Dept. of Health This video introduces the concept of a QI storyboard, describes how you can use it for project management and communications, and helps you create your own QI storyboard. For best results, watch this webinar using Internet Explorer. To read the transcript of this presentation, select the Notes tab in the upper-left of the webinar screen. If you need an alternative format, please contact the Center for Public Health Practice.
Examples
Birth defects data collection kaizen, Aug. 2013 (PDF) Minnesota Dept. of Health: Community and Family Health Division
Kaizen event summary: Municipal recycling (PDF) Washington County Department of Public Health and Environment
More information
Creating effective storyboards Public Health Foundation
Guidelines for development of QI storyboards (PDF) National Network of Public Health Institutes (NNPHI); MLC-3
Embracing quality in public health: A practitioner's quality improvement guidebook Michigan Public Health Institute: Office of Accreditation and QI
,
Quality Improvement Story Board
Improving Access to Prenatal Care in the First Trimester
Project coordinated by Kansas Health Institute, Kansas Association of Local Health Departments, Kansas Department of Heath and Environment, and KUMC Area Health Education Centers
Act Plan
DoStudy
QI Team Members:MLC-3 in Kansas
1. Background The Lower 8 of
Southeast Kansas collaborated to address barriers to early prenatal care. We had noticed that young women were not receiving prenatal care during the fi rst trimester of their pregnancy.
Statistical information was downloaded from KDHE/KIC (Kansas Information for Communities) to determine if this was true of all age groups or if there was a specifi c age which needed to be addressed. The 15–24 year age group was more likely to receive inadequate prenatal care. Between 2003–2007, 35 percent of women in this age group did not receive prenatal care in the fi rst trimester. There were 77 births which received no prenatal care.
After reviewing data and collecting anecdot- al information, it was decided that a lack of insurance was the most likely contributing factor. The application process for Medicaid/ CHIP seemed to be the bottleneck.
2. Aim Statement By Dec. 31, 2009, we will promote an
increase of 2 percent in the enrollment of eligible pregnant women in the Medicaid/ CHIP program during the fi rst trimester of pregnancy over the previous quarter’s Women, Infants and Children (WIC) data. Assistance in completing the application and faxing the application to the Kansas Health Policy Authority will be offered to all eligible women.
3. Examine the Current Approach Current practices and processes revealed: ● Lack of a uniform approach within a
public health region. ● Need for educational information. ● Need for comprehensive Maternal and
Child Health (MCH) services. ● Need for Medicaid/CHIP application
assistance.
4. Identify Potential Solutions Provide assistance to pregnant women with
the Medicaid/CHIP application process.
5. Develop an Improvement Theory ● Develop a pregnancy testing checklist. ● Standardize pregnancy/history form. ● Make a sample Medicaid/CHIP application. ● Provide training to all staff for the
application process.
6. Test the Theory The region: ● Reviewed best practices and
recommendations for increasing the timeliness of prenatal care.
● Collected WIC data for March–May, 2009 for a measurement baseline.
● There were 69.2% of Medicaid/CHIP women who received fi rst trimester care in this time period.
● Combined the questionnaire and checklist into a one-page document.
● Standardized existing pregnancy/history form.
● Made a sample of the Medicaid/CHIP application.
● Developed a checklist for the health departments’ staff to use.
● Provided training to all staff regarding the utilization of forms and the application process.
● Tested the standardized questionnaire/ checklist in the Lower 8 health departments beginning July 1, 2009.
7. Study the Results Evaluation of implemented intervention took place in October–November 2009 by: ● Review the survey
information collected from WIC clinics of newly pregnant enrollees for the months of July–September. There were 76.6 percent of Medicaid/CHIP women who received fi rst trimester care in this time period, an increase of 10.7 percent.
● Conduct staff meeting to get feedback from all eight health departments on new process.
● Share feedback with Lower 8 MLC-3 team members.
8. Standardize the Improvement ● Continue use of the questionnaire/
checklist to assist in uniformity and continuity.
● Continue to provide assistance with Medicaid/CHIP application process.
9. Establish Future Plans ● Continue to gather WIC data on a semi-
annual basis. ● Analyze data to determine if theory
continues to achieve the desired outcome.
Do
Study
Act
Lower 8 of Southeast Kansas Counties: Chautauqua, Cherokee, Crawford, Elk, Labette, Montgomery, Neosho, and Wilson
Serving a population of: 154,883
● Ruth Bardwell ● Debbi Baugher ● Jeanie Beason ● Kandy Dowell
● Todd Durham ● Betha Elliott ● Janis Goedeke ● Teresa Starr
Plan
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
First Trimester Prenatal Care Access Among Medicaid/CHIP Beneficiaries
March 2009 – May 2009
July 2009 – Sept. 2009
Intervention
Pr en
at al
C ar
e A
cc es
se d
in
Fi rs
t T ri
m es
te r
(% ) 10.7%
increase 69.2%
76.6%
Lack of a Support System
Financial Resources Physicians
Cultural BarriersEducation Lack of
knowledge of importance of prenatal care
Complex SRS application process
Language Habits
Parental Non-involvement
of boyfriend
Job-related issues (absences from work)Schools
Geography (distance
from provider)
Traditions
Lack of insurance
Embarassed to seek financial
assistance for prenatal care
Lack of hospital
Unable to get appointment
Physicians do not initiate care until second trimester
No provider for prenatal
care in county
Religious beliefs
Attitudes about prenatal care
Fishbone Diagram: Root causes for the lack of timely prenatal care in the Lower 8 of Southeast Kansas Subregion
Barriers to Timely Prenatal Care
Quality Improvement Story Board
Improving Access to Prenatal Care in the First Trimester
Project coordinated by Kansas Health Institute, Kansas Association of Local Health Departments, Kansas Department of Heath and Environment, and KUMC Area Health Education Centers
Act Plan
DoStudy
QI Team Members:MLC-3 in Kansas
1. Background The Northeast Corner Subregion, which
consists of the Shawnee County Health Agency and the Jefferson County Health Department, serves a signifi cant number of women of childbearing age. For the purpose of this project, services provided to women through certain programs will engage consumers by linking them to the health care delivery system through guidelines and provider networking.
2. Aim Statement By Oct. 1, 2009, in
four clinic programs at two local health departments, pregnant women not enrolled in prenatal care will consistently be given a current listing of community obstetricians, 90 percent of those with limited resources will receive staff assistance in making a prenatal intake appointment, and 95 percent of those intakes will be scheduled within 10 working days from the date of request.
3. Examine the Current Approach Current practices and processes:
● Verbal counseling on prenatal care to all pregnant women.
● Not all clinics provide listings of area obstetricians to all pregnant women, or consistently refer pregnant women to prenatal services.
● Limited number of prenatal intake appointments are available each week.
4. Identify Potential Solutions ● Keep both health departments current
on clinic schedules.
● Offer to make intake appointments while clients are still on-site.
● Collect primary data from women of childbearing age through a survey in order to identify common barriers.
5. Develop an Improvement Theory ● Open the clinic intake appointment
book to accommodate two to fi ve more intakes per week.
● Eliminate “cold handoff “ referral of providing written provider contact information only and move to “warm handoff” of making the fi rst prenatal intake appointment.
● Administer a survey tool to identify barriers to prenatal care.
● Reformat intake registration form and change the process of how the form is fi lled out.
6. Test the Theory The team implemented a number of qual-
ity improvement interventions during the course of the project. First, the team focused on accommodating as many new in- take appointments as the clinics’ schedule al- lowed. By opening their scheduling registers and demanding fl exibility, two to fi ve more intake visits per week were scheduled.
Second, the new system made sure that prenatal intake appointments were scheduled on-site.
Third, the focus was on administration of a survey tool to identify reasons why women did not receive timely prenatal care.
7. Study the Results Creation of additional appointment
slots per week resulted in a substantial increase in the number of follow-up appointments scheduled within two weeks of the initial request. Before the scheduling intervention, only 83 percent of appointments were within that timeframe. After the intervention, that rate went up to 97 percent — a 17 percent increase. The intervention also contributed to an increase in the number of women who entered
prenatal care in the fi rst trimester by 35 percent — from 51 percent to 69 percent.
The surveys administered as part of the third intervention showed that two-thirds of the pregnant women at both clinics did not plan their pregnancies, making it harder for them to access prenatal care in a timely fashion after conception.
8. Standardize the Improvement ● Continue to expand the number of
prenatal intake appointments. ● Standardize the process to schedule
prenatal intake appointments within ten working days. ● Adopt reformatted
intake registration form in both English
and Spanish.
9. Establish Future Plans
Form a group to focus on barriers to prenatal care identifi ed by survey respondents.
Northeast Corner Subregion
Counties: Shawnee and Jefferson Serving a population of: 193,130
● Eileen Filbert ● Anne Freeze ● Teresa Fisher ● Kay Powell ● Judy Willett
● Debbie McNary ● Allison Alejos ● Barbara Heston ● Martha Conlin
Plan
Do
Study
Act
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Jan. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008
51%
69%
May 22, 2009 – Aug. 14, 2009
Intervention
Pr en
at al
C ar
e A
cc es
se d
in Fi
rs t T
ri m
es te
r (%
) 35% increase
First Trimester Prenatal Care Access Among Medicaid/CHIP Beneficiaries
People Information/Feedback Machines
Materials/EquipmentMethods/ Procedures
Motivation/Incentives
Scheduling
Appointments more than two
weeks out
Family influence: Lack knowledge of
prenatal care
Lack knowledge of prenatal care
Good resources not available?
What resources are most useful?
Not a patient priority
Community OB’s not invested in 1st trimester
Lack family support
Not easily retrievable
or timelyDecreased potential for miscarriage in 2nd trimester
Not listening to information
What are patients’ resources for information
Lack knowledge No support system at all
Limited pre- natal data
available
No transportationNo money/coverage to pay for care
SRS application process is complex
Don’t seek care until having a problem
Talk themselves out of early care
Have had previous healthy babies
No phone to make appointments
No appropriate educational materials
Patients lack knowledge of prenatal care
In 2008, 49% of women did not access early prenatal care at the SCHA-CHC M&I clinic. 85% were age 20 years or older.
Fishbone Diagram: Root causes for the lack of timely prenatal care in the Northeast Corner Subregion
- Access_To_Prenatal_Care-SE.pdf
- Access_To_Prenatal_Care-NE
,
Completed PDSA Worksheet (NC Program on Health Literacy)
PDSA Directions and Examples
The Plan-Do-Study-Act method is a way to test a change that is implemented. By going through the prescribed four steps, it guides the thinking process into breaking down the task into steps and then evaluating the outcome, improving on it, and testing again. Most of us go through some or all of these steps when we implement change in our lives, and we don’t even think about it. Having them written down often helps people focus and learn more. For more information on the Plan-Do-Study-Act, go to the IHI (Institute for Healthcare Improvement) Web site or this PowerPoint presentation on Model for Improvement. Keep the following in mind when using the PDSA cycles to implement the health literacy tools:
Single Step – Each PDSA often contains only a segment or single step of the entire tool implementation.
Short Duration – Each PDSA cycle should be as brief as possible for you to gain knowledge that it is working or not (some can be as short as 1 hour).
Small Sample Size – A PDSA will likely involve only a portion of the practice (maybe 1 or 2 doctors). Once that feedback is obtained and the process refined, the implementation can be broadened to include the whole practice.
Filling out the worksheet
Tool: Fill in the tool name you are implementing. Step: Fill in the smaller step within that tool you are trying to implement. Cycle: Fill in the cycle number of this PDSA. As you work though a strategy for implementation, you will often go back and adjust something and want to test if the change you made is better or not. Each time you make an adjustment and test it again, you will do another cycle. PLAN I plan to: Here you will write a concise statement of what you plan to do in this testing. This will be much more focused and smaller than the implementation of the tool. It will be a small portion of the implementation of the tool. I hope this produces: Here you can put a measurement or an outcome that you hope to achieve. You may have quantitative data like a certain number of doctors performed teach-back, or qualitative data such as nurses noticed less congestion in the lobby. Steps to execute: Here is where you will write the steps that you are going to take in this cycle. You will want to include the following:
Completed PDSA Worksheet (NC Program on Health Literacy)
The population you are working with – are you going to study the doctors’ behavior or the patients’ or the nurses’?
The time limit that you are going to do this study – remember, it does not have to be long, just long enough to get your results. And, you may set a time limit of 1 week but find out after 4 hours that it doesn’t work. You can terminate the cycle at that point because you got your results.
DO After you have your plan, you will execute it or set it in motion. During this implementation, you will be keen to watch what happens once you do this. What did you observe? Here you will write down observations you have during your implementation. This may include how the patients react, how the doctors react, how the nurses react, how it fit in with your system or flow of the patient visit. You will ask, “Did everything go as planned?” “Did I have to modify the plan?” STUDY After implementation you will study the results. What did you learn? Did you meet your measurement goal? Here you will record how well it worked, if you meet your goal. ACT What did you conclude from this cycle? Here you will write what you came away with for this implementation, if it worked or not. And if it did not work, what can you do differently in your next cycle to address that. If it did work, are you ready to spread it across your entire practice?
Examples
Below are 2 examples of how to fill out the PDSA worksheet for 2 different tools, Tool 17: Get Patient Feedback and Tool 5: The Teach-Back Method. Each contain 3 PDSA cycles. Each one has short cycles and works through a different option on how to disseminate the survey to patient (Tool 17: Patient Feedback) and how to introduce teach-back and have providers try it. (Tool 5: The Teach-Back Method).
Completed PDSA Worksheet (NC Program on Health Literacy)
PDSA (plan-do-study-act) worksheet
TOOL: Patient Feedback STEP: Dissemination of surveys CYCLE: 1st Try
PLAN
I plan to: We are going to test a process of giving out satisfaction surveys and getting
them filled out and back to us.
I hope this produces: We hope to get at least 25 completed surveys per week during this
campaign. Steps to execute:
1. We will display the surveys at the checkout desk.
2. The checkout attendant will encourage the patient to fill out a survey and put it in
the box next to the surveys.
3. We will try this for 1 week.
DO
What did you observe?
We noticed that patients often had other things to attend to at this time, like making
an appointment or paying for services and did not feel they could take on another
task at this time.
The checkout area can get busy and backed up at times.
The checkout attendant often remembered to ask the patient if they would like to fill
out a survey.
STUDY
What did you learn? Did you meet your measurement goal?
We only had 8 surveys returned at the end of the week. This process did not work well.
ACT
What did you conclude from this cycle?
Patients did not want to stay to fill out the survey once their visit was over. We need to
give patients a way to fill out the survey when they have time.
We will encourage them to fill it out when they get home and offer a stamped envelope to
mail the survey back to us.
Completed PDSA Worksheet (NC Program on Health Literacy)
PDSA (plan-do-study-act) worksheet
TOOL: Patient Feedback STEP: Dissemination of surveys CYCLE: 2nd Try
PLAN
I plan to: We are going to test a process of giving out satisfaction surveys and getting
them filled out and back to us.
I hope this produces: We hope to get at least 25 completed surveys per week during this
campaign. Steps to execute:
1. We will display the surveys at the checkout desk.
2. The checkout attendant will encourage the patient to take a survey and an envelope.
They will be asked to fill the survey out at home and mail it back to us.
3. We will try this for 2 weeks.
DO
What did you observe?
The checkout attendant successfully worked the request of the survey into the
checkout procedure.
We noticed that the patient had other papers to manage at this time as well.
Per Checkout attendant only about 30% actually took a survey and envelope.
STUDY
What did you learn? Did you meet your measurement goal?
We only had 3 surveys returned at the end of 2 weeks. This process did not work well.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.