Have you ever been oppressed? After reviewing this week’s material, have you realized that you might have been the oppressor, even unconsciously? We have read about areas of oppression

Module 4:  Lecture: Oppression as a Constitutive Element

Review the  PPT slides  Download PPT slides for this lecture, and  download a PDF  Download download a PDF of the lecture if you would like a written copy. 

Oppression in the Context of Social Justice

In a social justice context, oppression occurs when individuals or groups of people are discriminated against or treated unfairly, whether by the government, private organizations, individuals, or other groups (Head, 2021). The word comes from the Latin root  opprimere, meaning pressed down. There are multiple forms of oppression linked to social justice. The twelve main ones are highlighted here. The categories describe patterns of behavior and not necessarily belief systems. A person can have strong beliefs in favor of social equality and still practice oppression through their actions. In many cases, these categories of oppression overlap so that a person can potentially deal with multiple forms of oppression and privilege at the same time. The experience of multiple and different forms of oppression is described by the term "intersectionality" (Head, 2021).

Intersectionality Intersectionality is about the interconnected nature of social categorizations such as race, class, and gender, seen as creating overlapping and interdependent systems of discrimination or disadvantage (Oxford Dictionary).

Intersectionality is a framework for conceptualizing a person, group of people, or social problem affected by various discriminations and disadvantages. It considers people's overlapping identities and experiences to understand the complexity of the prejudices they face. Intersectionality recognizes that identity markers (e.g., "woman" and "black") do not exist independently of each other and that each informs the others, often creating a complex convergence of oppression. In other words, intersectional theory affirms that people are often disadvantaged by multiple sources of oppression: their race, class, gender identity, sexual orientation, religion, and other identity markers.

Kimberlé Crenshaw (1989) first coined the term intersectionality. However, the theory emerged two decades earlier, when black feminists began to talk about the white, middle-class nature of the mainstream feminist movement. Today, intersectionality is seen as crucial to social equity work. Activists and community organizations are calling for and engaging in more dynamic conversations about the differences in experience among people with different overlapping identities. Without an intersectional lens, events and movements that aim to address injustice toward one group may perpetuate systems of inequities toward other groups.

Contemporary Manifestations of Oppression

Oppression manifests itself in many ways.

Relationship between Oppression and Social Justice in Current Social Policies

Social change remains the common thread that must be used to build new realities. Social change can often be more effective by starting at the community level and then branching out into macro-systems.

Macrosystems include influences from government policies, corporations, and belief systems. To this end, it is critical to have a firm understanding of the dynamics that challenge communities. This understanding must extend to dealing with some of the most unjust practices, such as oppression and power, that have influenced and shaped many communities today, particularly where the members are people in a vulnerable state. It is important to note that oppression is the social act of imposing severe restrictions on an individual, group, or institution.

Furthermore, oppression is often discussed in the same context as the terms "dehumanization" and "exploitation." These are terms that portray injustice and cruelty (Harrison, 2015).

Why Does Oppression Exist?

Oppression occurs when individuals are systematically subjected to political, economic, cultural, or social degradation because they belong to a certain social group, resulting in structures of domination and subordination and, consequently, ideologies of superiority and inferiority. Usually, a government or political organization in power formally or covertly imposes restrictions on groups so that the distribution of resources is unfairly allocated. This means that power remains in the hands of those who already have it.

The "Western world" is a production of coloniality and modernity. These terms refer to the socio-cultural norms developed after the 18th century and the chapter in European history known as the Enlightenment. It is loosely defined by industrialization, science, division of labor, capitalism, secularism, education, and liberalism (Smith, 1999). Western modernity created and constructed the idea of "race" as a biological function, as part of a narrative to indicate the superiority of the white race and the inferiority of all other races (peoples).

What is Power?

Power is a concept that has come to possess numerous meanings for different individuals. Power is multifaceted and takes several forms: power over, too, and from (Kloos et al., 2012). Power over is the ability to compel or dominate others, control resources, and enforce commands. Power is the ability of individuals to pursue personal and collective goals and develop their capabilities. Power over is the ability to resist coercion and unwanted commands or demands.

Much of the conversation about power has been through the lens of empowerment (Riger, 1993; Rappaport, 1981; Rappaport, 1987). Rappaport (1981) proposed empowerment as a phenomenon of interest to the field, asserting the need for a distinction between real power (i.e., political empowerment) and perceived power (i.e., psychological empowerment).

Furthermore, empowerment is understood as an individualistic concept that needs to incorporate social power. These theorists have conceptualized empowerment as a manifestation of social power and propose three instruments for its implementation. First, it is having control over resources to be used to reward and punish various people. Second is the ability to control barriers to participation by defining what is discussed and how it is discussed. An example is expert power, which is based on a person's or group's "perceived knowledge, skill, or expertise" (Kloos et al., 2012). Third, it is a force that shapes shared consciousness through myths, ideology, and information control.

Strategies for Action: Implementation of Appropriate Social Policies

Social policy concerns societies worldwide to meet human needs for security, education, work, health, and welfare (Black, 1997). Community psychologists endorse a social justice and critical psychology perspective. The position is to challenge and address oppressive systems through various action strategies, including implementing social policy. The social policy addresses how states and societies respond to the global challenges of social, demographic, and economic change, poverty, migration, and globalization. Social policy analyzes the different roles of national governments, the family, civil society, the market, and international organizations in providing services and support throughout life, from childhood to the elderly. These services include support for children and families, schooling and education, housing and neighborhood renewal, income maintenance and poverty reduction, unemployment support and training, pensions, health, and social care. Social policy aims to identify and reduce inequalities in access to services and support between social groups defined by socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity, migration status, gender, sexual orientation, disability, age, and between countries.

Social Policy is Explicitly International, Interdisciplinary, and Applied

· International: explicitly addresses social and public policies from the perspective of advanced welfare systems and developing countries. It pays close attention to the different configurations of public policy actors (state, family, market, civil society) involved in providing social welfare in different contexts.

· Interdisciplinary: implies a broad interdisciplinary understanding of the conditions, institutions, and mechanisms of social change, drawing on the perspectives of anthropology, criminology, demography, economics, political science, sociology, and development.

· Applied: emphasizes the analytical and conceptual skills needed to interrogate social problems, analyze how social policies are implemented, and evaluate social policies. The consequences (positive and negative) of those policies are in various issue areas and high-, middle-, and low-income country contexts.

Dismantling Oppression and Power through Social Policies

Working social policy from a perspective grounded in anti-oppressive principles provides an approach that begins to match the complex issues of power, oppression, and powerlessness that shape recipients' lives of social care services. The driving force behind the anti-oppressive practice is the act of challenging inequalities. In that sense, the process of challenge creates social policies aimed at eradicating disparities. Challenges are not always successful and are often painful for the person or group being challenged or challenged.

Social policy based on anti-oppressive practice aspires to provide appropriate and responsive services that are needs-driven rather than resource-driven. This type of social policy must embody a person-centered philosophy; an egalitarian value system concerned with reducing the harmful effects of structural inequalities on people's lives; a methodology focused on both process and outcomes; and a way of structuring relationships between individuals that aims to empower users by reducing the negative effects of social hierarchies on their interaction and the work they do together (Dominelli 1994). A challenge, at best, involves changes at the macro and micro levels.

Social policy interventions include policies that affect the social conditions in which people live. The following are examples of social policies that are appropriate for dismantling oppression to improve human welfare and meet human needs (Freeman, 1997):

· Economic policy aimed at cash assistance to the poor.

· Policies involving access to abortion or laws governing marriage and divorce regulate and govern human behavior in areas such as sexuality and morality.

· Pension and social insurance programs for industrial workers and the needy.

· More inclusive systems of public education.

· Benefits for elderly veterans and their families.

· Social benefits for women and their children.

· Social Security Law.

· Health care programs (Medicare and Medicaid).

· Food Stamp Program

· Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC)

· Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF)

· Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC)

· An affirmative action policy was created to eradicate discriminatory practices and to ensure equal opportunities, generally to higher education and employment

The Social Worker as an Anti-oppression Agent

Social workers are well-positioned to make theoretically informed, holistic, empowering, and challenging assessments. Intervention based on anti-oppressive practice incorporates an analysis of the risks and needs of individuals in a vulnerable state. To work effectively, it is important to have a perspective that:

· is flexible without losing focus;

· includes the views of oppressed individuals and groups;

· is theoretically informed;

· challenge and change existing ideas and practices;

· can analyze the oppressive nature of the organizational culture and its impact on practice

· includes continuous reflection and evaluation of practice;

· has multidimensional change strategies that incorporate the concepts of networking, user involvement, partnership, and participation; and

· has a critical analysis of power issues, both personal and structural.

Service users, practitioners, students, and academics continue to grapple with ways of addressing issues of oppression in health and social care provision. The anti-oppressive practice then moves beyond descriptions of the nature of oppression to dynamic and creative ways of working. The principles of reflexivity, social difference, historical and geographical location, the personal as political, power and powerlessness, and the act of challenging provide a framework that can be used to dismantle oppression in the settings of people in need (Jason et al., 2019).

References Pathologies of Power. (2005).  Health, Human Rights, and the New War on the Poor. University of California Press. Pérez-Garzón, C. A. (January 2018). Unveiling the meaning of social justice.  Mexican Law Review, 10(2) 27-66. Thompson, N. (2002). Social movements, social justice, and social work.  The British Journal of Social Work, 32(6) 711–72

Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers

Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.

Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS

Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?

Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.

We write plagiarism Free Content

Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.

Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.