Submit the complete Strategic Audit ?for Amazon with se
Submit the complete Strategic Audit for Amazon with sections I to V(SFAS).
ASSIGNMENT: Submit the complete Strategic Audit with sections I to V(SFAS).
Submit also the updated/improved/corrected versions of 5-Y financials, Common ratios, Financial ratios, EFAS, IFAS, and SFAS in your SA.
Exhibit attachments to be included – Some exhibits go at the end of your SA (word document) and others are included in the 5-year financials of your case (Excel document).
- Exhibit 1, EFAS, included at the end of your SA
- Exhibit 2, IFAS, included at the end of your SA
- Exhibit 3, SFAS, included at the end of your SA
- Exhibit 4, Ratio Analysis for the past 5 years, included in Excel 5-year financials.
- Exhibit 5, Common-Size Income Statement for the past 5 years, included in Excel 5-year financials.
Assignment Submission Procedures
Writing Instructions
Level of detailed discussion and analysis: Your prose needs to be in sufficient detail to demonstrate your business knowledge, critical thinking, and critical analysis abilities. One-line statements do not show nor demonstrate satisfactory business knowledge. Bullets do not show nor demonstrate satisfactory business knowledge. Your writing needs to expand on each point in a paragraph where you discuss and analyze the important elements of that particular SA item. Make your paragraphs good complete detailed discussion and analysis
Formatting and Admin of the SA: Single space your SA with the appropriate line spacing between parts, sections, and paragraphs. Extra line spacing is a serious detractor. Follow the alphanumeric paragraph structure as in the text’s SA and as shown in the SA Paragraphing Structure Template and the Expanded Paragraph View for sections VI, VII, and VIII document. Do not use bullets. Use font size 10-12. Use Portrait page mode for your SA text – do not use Landscape page mode for your SA text. Use single space of 1.0 – do not use 1.15, nor 1.5.
Use the SA Writing Template in Course Resources.
For Section I: Current Situation:
1. For the paragraph on the Current Posture, discuss how Amazon as a company is doing currently in terms of revenues, profits, market share, etc. This is a big picture look at how the company is doing.
2. For the paragraph on Strategic Posture, state the current mission, talk about how the company is doing on its corporate, business, and functional objectives, talk about the Amazon’s strategy or a mix of strategies, and talk about the company’s current policies. .
For Section II: Strategic Managers:
1. For the paragraph on the Board of Directors (BOD), talk about who is on the BOD, how the BOD is organized, what are the important experience, knowledge, skills, background, and connections the BOD members bring, and what is their involvement and performance in the strategic management of the Amazon.
2. For the paragraph on the Top Management, talk about who the top managers are, how they are organized, what are the important experience, knowledge, skills, background, and style the top managers have, and what is their involvement and performance in the strategic management of the company.
For Section III: External Environment:
1. This paragraph covers the current status of the external environment facing the company. Don’t talk about what the the company should or could do or might do in the future about these external factors. Keep focused on what is facing the company now in the external environment.
2. Cover the many factors in the External Environment that you discovered as you analyzed and evaluated the case study. You need to discuss and analyze the 10 Strategic Factors from the EFAS (O1, O2, O3, O4, O5, T1, T2, T3, T4, T5) and any other external factors that are important to a good complete discussion about the external environment that your company is facing. Be sure to put in the EFAS SF tags (O1, O2, T1, T4, etc) at the sentence or paragraph where you discuss/analyze those most important 10 SF from the EFAS. Be sure to put in an O or a T when you discuss other factors of importance. This is your place to shine with your analytical abilities in your discussion and analysis of the factors facing your company. Do a good complete discussion and analysis.
3. For the Task Environment, be sure to cover the 6 elements of Porter’s methodology of competitive forces. See pages 108-112 in the text.
4. Your Summary in paragraph D should summarize the most important external strategic factors facing the company.
For Section IV: Internal Environment:
1. This paragraph covers the current status of the Amazon’s internal environment in three areas: Corporate Structure, Corporate Culture and Corporate Resources. Keep focused on the current internal status of the corporation, not what they should or should not do in the future. Remember, Corporate Structure is about how the corporation is organized, not about the BOD nor the Top Managers. Remember, Corporate Culture is about culture, not about HR programs or top management personnel.
2. Cover the many factors in the Internal Environment that you discovered as you analyzed and evaluated the case study. You need to discuss and analyze the 10 Strategic Factors from the IFAS (S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, W1, W2, W3, W4, W5) and any other internal factors that are important to a good complete discussion about the internal environment of the firm. Be sure to put in the IFAS SF tags (S2, S5, W3, W4 etc) at the sentence or paragraph where you discuss/analyze those most important 10 SF from the IFAS. Be sure to put in a S or W when you discuss other factors of importance. This is your place to shine with your analytical abilities in your discussion and analysis of the factors facing Amazon. Do a good complete discussion and analysis.
3. Be sure to identify your Core Competencies and your Distinctive Competencies.
4. Be sure to demonstrate your financial analysis skills by discussing some of your financial ratios as part of the paragraph on the Finance function. Discussing income statement trends is fine but does not replace your good complete discussion and analysis of the financial ratios of your company.
5. Your Summary in paragraph D should summarize the most important internal strategic factors of the company.
For Section V(SFAS): Analysis of Strategic Factors:
1. In your Situational Analysis, discuss the 10 most important Strategic Factors that are contained in your SFAS. These are the most important strategic factors for the company. Divide them up into paragraphs on Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. Be sure to identify them with your SF tags from the SFAS (S2, W4, T3, O2, etc etc)
2. In your Overall Situation of the Firm, provide an evaluation of the SFAS by answering the following questions: Could the ‘strengths’ be used to take advantage of the ‘opportunities’ mentioned in A? How?; Could the ‘strengths’ be used to minimize the ‘threats’ mentioned in A? How?; Does the firm needs a radical change to move forward? In what direction?
How do you build the SFAS?
The SFAS (Strategic Factors Analysis Summary) table is Exhibit 3 of your SA and supports Section V of your SA.
Complete the SFAS as described on pages 171-173 in the textbook. Focus on identifying the 10 most important strategic factors. Be sure to keep your SWOT tags on each SF.
Revise the weights to add to 1.0 and the ratings as needed.
You must complete the Comments Column in the table. Repeat or revise your comments for each strategic factor from the previous EFAS and IFAS tables.
Be sure to explain WHY it is a strategic factor; a quantified estimate of the potential impact (QPI) in the future of the SF; how you assigned the weight; and how you assigned the rating; and for Internal SF identify the Core Competencies (CC) and Distinctive Competencies (DC). Use the same quantitative analysis that you did for the EFAS and IFAS to estimate and quantify the potential impacts in the future; the impact on the firm’s future survival; and how well or how badly the firm is handling the SF right now.
Use the SFAS Template provided in Course Resources and here. These are just templates with words of reference. Use your own thinking and words.
TemplateSA-EXH 3-SFAS.docx
EXHIBIT 3
STRATEGIC FACTOR ANALYSIS SUMMARY (SFAS) on OLALLIEBERRY PIE COMPANY (OPC)
|
Strategic Factors |
Weight |
Rating |
Weighted Score |
S H O R T |
I N T E R M E D I A T E |
L O N G |
Comments |
|
S1 Competent Senior Leadership |
.10 |
4.5 |
.45 |
X |
This SF was chosen because of its significant positive impact on corporate performance in sales, costs, and industry leadership. Affect on the top line future sales revenue is estimated at 25%($100M-$150M/YR). Top management adds significant benefit to OPC’s profit posture and stockholder satisfaction. Senior Leadership is considered a core competency. This SF is weighted very high at .10 as leadership is very important to survival in the world economy. OPC is rated high at 4.5 as an industry leader with a highly competent management team. |
||
|
S2 Supplier Relationships |
.075 |
4.5 |
.3375 |
X |
X |
X |
I selected this SF because it is a core competency and directly impacts OPC’s low raw material cost structure and high quality product. Suppliers work seamlessly with OPC Operations to deliver quality raw materials in a highly efficient just-in-time logistics system. Resource and production costs are maintained at a level about 20% below the industry average; saving OPC about $20-$40M/YR in the future. Weight is relatively mid-level as this core competency is important to OPC’s survival and competitive position. Rating is 4.5 as OPC is performing at a level high above the industry norm. |
|
S5 Corporate Culture |
.15 |
5.0 |
.75 |
X |
This SF is important because it is a distinctive competence that reverberates throughout the entire organization and provides a 20-30% cost and productivity advantage for OPC over its competitors. Future advantage is estimated at $125M-$200M/YR in cost savings. Maintaining the positive corporate culture is essential to survival in the increasingly competitive environment. Weight is second highest at .15 because of the importance of culture to the future survival of OPC. Rating is highest at 5.0 because OPC is the indisputable industry leader. |
||
|
W1 Management Information System (MIS) |
.10 |
2.0 |
.20 |
X |
X |
I selected this SF because OPC’s MIS is outdated and behind times since they have not invested in a new enterprise resource planning (ERP) system. This weakness could have a very negative impact on future revenues and costs, 30-40% of sales ($120M-$160M/YR), since a modern MIS is not in use. Competitors have invested in modern ERP systems. Weight is relatively high at .10 as this is very important to corporate survival. Rating is low at 2.0 since OPC has fallen behind its competition. |
|
|
W4 Financial Position |
.05 |
2.0 |
.10 |
X |
This SF is important because OPC’s financial position has deteriorated over the recent past year as its ROI has fallen from 15% to 7% and the debt to asset ratio has ballooned. Stockholders are concerned. This recent poor financial position is a very important SF for OPC’s future as such a position may put OPC in a non-competitive position in the marketplace, stock market and bond market. Future cost to OPC may include higher borrowing costs of $10M-$30M/YR and/or reduction in sales of $20M-$30M/YR. Weight is relatively low at .05 since it is not as important as other SF but financial integrity and balance are important to survival. Rating is low as OPC is not executing up to industry standard. |
||
|
O2 International Growth Opportunities |
.20 |
2.5 |
.05 |
X |
X |
This SF was selected because of its very significant potential impact on profit growth. Successful expansion into overseas markets could potentially result in doubling the size of OPC to a firm with $800M in sales per year and increase profits from $50M to $100M per year. This SF is weighted highest at .20 since expanding internationally is vital to the survival of OPC in light of worldwide competitors and markets. I rated this low at 2.5 since OPC does not have any international experience or markets at this time. |
|
|
O4 Internet Availability |
.10 |
2.0 |
.20 |
X |
X |
I chose this SF because the expansion of Internet availability to more and more U.S. families is an important SF for all food companies to take advantage of. With consumers’ online orders expected to increase at a yearly rate of 20% across all consumer goods, OPC has an outstanding opportunity to take advantage of this trend. We can expect internet sales to become 25% of our sales revenues or about $100M per year in the next 5 years. Internet sales also could boost our market share from 50% to 70% in the western states. This SF could have a very significant impact on sales and on survival so the weight is relatively high at .10. OPC scores well below industry standard here at 2.0 because their Internet marketing/sales process is not well developed. |
|
|
T1 U. S. Competition |
.10 |
4.0 |
.40 |
X |
X |
I selected this SF because strong competition from the Raspberry Pie Company (RPC) and others threaten OPC’s market share and sales. RPC has increased its marketing efforts in the western states. Potential loss of market share from 50% to 40% or lower would directly result in sales revenues being reduced by $160M-$200M/YR. This is weighted high at .10 as OPC survival depends on maintaining its market share against competition. Rated high at 4.0 as OPC market share has been maintained with an aggressive marketing program in the western states |
|
|
T2 Imports from China |
.075 |
2.5 |
.1875 |
X |
This SF is important because strong worldwide competition is starting to come from Chinese imports to the west coast. These low-cost, high-quality products threaten to take away 10-20% of OPC’s west coast market share and reduce sales by $40-80M per year. This is weighted relatively mid-level at .075 since losing that amount of sales revenues would threaten the survival of the firm. This SF is rated low at 2.5 because OPC has not countered the emergence of Chinese competition with a new marketing effort. |
||
|
T3 Increasing Government Regulation |
.05 |
4.0 |
.20 |
X |
X |
X |
I selected this SF because government regulations on labor use, raw material quality, environment protection and financial reform are placing an increasing additional future cost burden on OPC of about 18% of sales($72M/YR). Compliance costs are hurting the bottom line significantly. These costs are potentially fatal for the survival of OPC unless relief is obtained. Weighted at a relative value of .05 since other SF are considered more important. This SF rating is high at 4.0 because OPC is an industry leader in lobbying operations to reduce government regulation. |
|
Total Scores: |
1.00 |
2.875 |
2
6
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
