Week 6 Assignment – Recruiting, Selection, and Training

39258Instructions
Use the Internet or the Strayer Library to research a company for which you would like to work. Focus your research on the selected company’s approach to recruiting, selecting, training, and managing its workers.

Note: You may use the same company you selected for your assignment in Week 3.

Requirements
Write a 4-5-page paper in which you:

Describe (briefly) the company you researched.
Evaluate the effectiveness of the company’s recruiting efforts.
Suggest two recommendations for improving the company’s recruiting efforts.
Analyze the company’s selection process.
Recommend two areas for improving the company’s selection process.
Assess the general effectiveness of human resource planning and performance management systems.
Determine the level of influence that training and talent management have on the company’s labor force.
Use at least five quality academic resources in this assignment. Consider beginning with your course textbooks and scholarly sources that can be found in the Strayer Library.

Note: Wikipedia does not qualify as an academic resource.

This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the Library site for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:

Evaluate the effectiveness of a company’s recruiting, selection, performance and talent management process.
Week 6 Assignment – Recruiting, Selection, and Training
Week 6 Assignment – Recruiting, Selection, and Training
Criteria Ratings Pts
Describe the company you researched.
view longer description
7.7 to >6.93 pts
Exemplary
Thoroughly described the company you researched.
6.93 to >6.16 pts
Competent
Satisfactorily described the company you researched.
6.16 to >5.39 pts
Needs Improvement
Partially described the company you researched.
5.39 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Did not submit or incompletely described the company you researched.
/ 7.7 pts
Evaluate the effectiveness of the company’s recruiting efforts.
view longer description
14.3 to >12.87 pts
Exemplary
Thoroughly evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s recruiting efforts.
12.87 to >11.44 pts
Competent
Satisfactorily evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s recruiting efforts.
11.44 to >10.01 pts
Needs Improvement
Partially evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s recruiting efforts.
10.01 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s recruiting efforts.
/ 14.3 pts
Suggest two recommendations for improving the company’s recruiting efforts.
view longer description
14.3 to >12.87 pts
Exemplary
Thoroughly suggested two recommendations for improving the company’s recruiting efforts.
12.87 to >11.44 pts
Competent
Satisfactorily suggested two recommendations for improving the company’s recruiting efforts.
11.44 to >10.01 pts
Needs Improvement
Partially suggested two recommendations for improving the company’s recruiting efforts.
10.01 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Did not submit or incompletely suggested two recommendations for improving the company’s recruiting efforts.
/ 14.3 pts
Analyze the company’s selection process.
view longer description
14.3 to >12.87 pts
Exemplary
Thoroughly analyzed the company’s selection process.
12.87 to >11.44 pts
Competent
Satisfactorily analyzed the company’s selection process.
11.44 to >10.01 pts
Needs Improvement
Partially analyzed the company’s selection process.
10.01 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the company’s selection process.
/ 14.3 pts
Recommend two areas for improving the company’s selection process.
view longer description
14.3 to >12.87 pts
Exemplary
Thoroughly recommended two areas for improving the company’s selection process.
12.87 to >11.44 pts
Competent
Satisfactorily recommended two areas for improving the company’s selection process.
11.44 to >10.01 pts
Needs Improvement
Partially recommended two areas for improving the company’s selection process.
10.01 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Did not submit or incompletely recommended two areas for improving the company’s selection process.
/ 14.3 pts
Assess the general effectiveness of human resource planning and performance management systems.
view longer description
14.3 to >12.87 pts
Exemplary
Thoroughly assessed the general effectiveness of human resource planning and performance management systems.
12.87 to >11.44 pts
Competent
Satisfactorily assessed the general effectiveness of human resource planning and performance management systems.
11.44 to >10.01 pts
Needs Improvement
Partially assessed the general effectiveness of human resource planning and performance management systems.
10.01 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Did not submit or incompletely assessed the general effectiveness of human resource planning and performance management systems.
/ 14.3 pts
Determine the level of influence that training and talent management have on the company’s labor force.
view longer description
14.3 to >12.87 pts
Exemplary
Thoroughly determined the level of influence that training and talent management have on the company’s labor force.
12.87 to >11.44 pts
Competent
Satisfactorily determined the level of influence that training and talent management have on company’s labor force.
11.44 to >10.01 pts
Needs Improvement
Partially determined the level of influence that training and talent management have on the company’s labor force.
10.01 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Did not submit or incompletely determined the level of influence that training and talent management have on the company’s labor force.
/ 14.3 pts
Use at least five high-quality academic resources in this assignment.
view longer description
5.5 to >4.95 pts
Exemplary
Exceeds the required number of references; all references are high-quality choices.
4.95 to >4.4 pts
Competent
Meets the required number of references; all references are high-quality choices.
4.4 to >3.85 pts
Needs Improvement
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references are poor-quality choices.
3.85 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
No references provided.
/ 5.5 pts
Write clearly, applying sound mechanics and correct SWS formatting.
view longer description
11 to >9.9 pts
Exemplary
0–2 errors present.
9.9 to >8.8 pts
Competent
3–4 errors present.
8.8 to >7.7 pts
Needs Improvement
5–6 errors present.
7.7 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
More than 6 errors present.
/ 11 pts