You will write a 1.5-page public comment on an active (or recently active) public health policy issue. All new rules and regulations, or revisions to existing rules and regulations at
Assignment: Public Comment
Instructions for assignment
You will write a 1.5-page public comment on an active (or recently active) public health policy issue. All new rules and regulations, or revisions to existing rules and regulations at the federal level must, by law, open for public comment for a certain period of time. For this assignment, you will search for an active public comment opportunity that is related to public health. You will then take a position on the proposed rule or regulatory change, and support your position with research. You do not have to actually submit your comment, though you are definitely encouraged to do so.
You may write as yourself, or you may take on a role of a person in a particular organization/ stakeholder group.
Evidence-based advocacy is important for regulatory decision-making. Public comments are an opportunity to communicate with government agencies and legislators directly in which you can assert a position or make specific recommendations, based on evidence, to promote the public’s health. These public comments are an essential part of the policy making process and aid agencies in their work.
You can look for comment solicitations in the following places:
Regulations.gov
The Federal Register
The Federal Digital System https://www.regulations.gov
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collection.action?collectionCode=FR
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/search/home.action
New York State:
https://ocfs.ny.gov/main/legal/regulatory/pc/
https://ocfs.ny.gov/main/legal/regulatory/pccon/
Instructions:
You can choose any regulation, at any agency at the state or federal level to write to as long as the regulation is appropriate to allow you to demonstrate knowledge about public health policy. Commenting on a regulation that is currently open to public comment is encouraged, however, if you cannot find one currently open you want to respond to you may choose a regulation that was open for public comment within the last year or so. You are not required to actually submit your comment to the agency, though you are certainly encouraged to do so.
In your public comment, you should identify the regulation you are commenting on (and provide the link), demonstrate knowledge of the issues under consideration by the agency, take a clear position, make a strong case for your position using evidence to describe the public health problem and potential impact of your recommendation, and recognize and respond to potential criticisms/arguments against your recommendation.
Your public comment should follow the following guidelines:
1.5 pages in length, single spaced
12-point font, Times New Roman
1-inch margins
Use page numbers
Cite all sources consistently and include a reference list at the end (use numeric super-script citations in the text). The reference list is not included in the page limit.- Numeric citations should be at the end of each sentence for the idea/information is taken from any sources.
Example Public Comments:
These are not exactly perfect but are excellent examples of public comment assignment from previous years.
1
August 13, 2019
Administrator Kevin Shea Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture Attention: APHIS-2018-0034 1400 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20250 Re: APHIS-2018-0034; Movement of Certain Genetically Engineered Organisms Dear Administrator Shea: I am pleased to submit the following comments on the proposed rule updating and modernizing the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) approach to evaluating and assessing risks posed by genetically engineered (GE) organisms. Appropriate regulation of GE organisms is important to promoting and protecting the health of Americans. Although, the USDA has not made significant updates to the regulation of GE organisms in nearly three decades, the proposed rule would institute less regulation, permitting, and field testing for the majority of GE and gene edited plants. 1 In addition, the proposed oversight pathways for GE plants appear to be less transparent than existing regulations because they do not include Federal Register notices, or other public comment procedures. For these reasons, I write to express my concerns with the proposed rule. The Plant Protection Act (PPA) authorizes the USDA to administer a premarket program that includes the review of GE organisms (including plants) to determine whether they pose plant pest risks to domestic agriculture. 2 If the USDA concludes that they do pose such a risk, the agency requires a permit or notification to facilitate the organism’s importation, interstate movement, or environmental release. In other words, any movement of a GE organism must first be authorized by the USDA under existing regulations. 3 My major concern with the proposed rule is that it is a significant departure from the existing oversight processes, which introduces more health risks into the consumer market. Specifically, the proposed regulatory framework is likely to lead to more genetically engineered plants entering the market without undergoing a rigorous assessment and evaluation by the USDA. Moreover, GE plant developers will be able to “self-determine” whether certain GE plants should be exempted from premarket review and evaluation, rather than the USDA making that determination proactively.4 This increases the risk of potentially harmful GE plant products, or plant products that have adverse effects entering the market and being consumed by Americans. Adequate regulation of GE organisms is vital to maintaining the public health of Americans. I support the USDA’s mission to promote agriculture production that better nourishes Americans while also helping to feed others throughout the world, however, this proposed rule would increase the risk and abundance of harmful GE plants entering the market.
2
I urge the USDA to revise the proposed rule to keep in place the existing regulatory framework that requires premarket approval and review of GE organisms and plants. I also urge the USDA to ensure that a process for public comment and feedback, such as posting notices in the Federal Register, is included in the final rule to ensure transparency. I appreciate the opportunity to submit these comments and welcome further discussion. Sincerely, X References
3
1. Kuzma, Jennifer. Biotechnology Oversight Gets an Early Make-Over by Trump’s White House and USDA: Part 2 – The USDA-APHIS Rule. Genetic Engineering and Society Center, North Carolina State University. https://research.ncsu.edu/ges/2019/07/ag-biotech-oversight-makeover- part-2-usda-aphis-rule/ 2. 7 U.S.C. §§ 7701–7786. 3. Beaver, Nathan, et. al. Key Takeaways from USDA’s Biotech Regulation Proposal. Foley & Lardner, LLP. June 26, 2019. https://www.foley.com/en/insights/publications/2019/06/key- takeaways-usda-biotech-regulation-proposal 4. Bergeson & Campbell, P.C. APHIS Proposes Revised Regulatory Framework Regarding the Movement of Certain Genetically Engineered Organisms. June 8, 2019. https://www.natlawreview.com/article/aphis-proposes-revised-regulatory-framework-regarding- movement-certain-genetically
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
