Students must qualify for special education services under one of the disability categories outlined by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. There is a specific process inv

RTI, MTSS, and Special Education Identification Processes – Rubric

Explanation and Visual of RTI, MTSS, and the Special Education Identi�cation Process 28 points

Criteria Description

Explanation and Visual of RTI, MTSS, and the Special Education Identification Process

5. Target 28 points

Brochure for parents includes a visually appealing graphic organizer that accurately outlines the special

education identification process, including RTI, and MTSS. An insightful explanation describing the special

education process is provided.

4. Acceptable 24.36 points

A sound explanation describing the special education identification process is provided. Brochure for parents

includes a simple, accurate graphic organizer outlining the special education identification process, including

RTI, and MTSS.

3. Approaching 20.72 points

Explanation describing the process and parental rights is lacking detail or missing key information. Brochure

for parents includes an unclear or underdeveloped visual outlining the special education identification process,

RTI, and MTSS.

2. Insufficient 19.32 points

Explanation is incomprehensible or wholly inaccurate. Brochure for parents is missing the required visual, or

visual insufficiently or inaccurately outlines the special education identification process, RTI, and MTSS.

1. No Submission 0 points

Overview of Procedural Safeguards and Parental Rights 14 points

Criteria Description

Collapse All

Overview of Procedural Safeguards and Parental Rights

5. Target 14 points

An insightful overview of the procedural safeguards and parental rights is provided.

4. Acceptable 12.18 points

A sound overview of the procedural safeguards and parental rights is provided.

3. Approaching 10.36 points

Overview describing the procedural safeguards and parental rights is lacking detail or missing key information.

2. Insufficient 9.66 points

Overview insufficiently or inaccurately describes the procedural safeguards and parental rights.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Resources to Support Families who have Children with Disabilities 14 points

Criteria Description

Resources to Support Families who have Children with Disabilities

5. Target 14 points

Includes relevant, quality resources to support families.

4. Acceptable 12.18 points

Includes appropriate resources to support families.

3. Approaching 10.36 points

Includes less than three resources to support families or resources only loosely relate to the needs of families

in this context.

2. Insufficient 9.66 points

Resources for families are inappropriate for context or missing.

1. No Submission 0 points

Research 3.5 points

Criteria Description

Research

5. Target 3.5 points

Research is supportive of the information presented. Sources are timely, distinctive and clearly address all of

the criteria stated in the assignment.

4. Acceptable 3.05 points

Research is relevant and generally supports the information presented. All of the criteria stated in the

assignment are addressed.

3. Approaching 2.59 points

Submission includes only 1-2 sources, sources do not fully support claims, or sources are not all credible.

2. Insufficient 2.42 points

Sources provided do not support the claims of the presentation or are not credible.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Overall Presentation 3.5 points

Criteria Description

Overall Presentation

5. Target 3.5 points

The work is well presented. The overall appearance is neat and professional. Work would be highly presentable

to families

4. Acceptable 3.05 points

The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor organizational flaws. Work would be presentable to

families

3. Approaching 2.59 points

The work is not neat and includes several minor organizational flaws. Work would barely be presentable to

families

2. Insufficient 2.42 points

The work is not neat or organized. Work would not be presentable to families.

1. No Submission 0 points

Format and Documentation of Sources 3.5 points

Criteria Description

Format and Documentation of Sources (layout, citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate

to assignment and style)

5. Target 3.5 points

Sources are documented completely and correctly, as appropriate to assignment and style. Format is free of

error.

4. Acceptable 3.05 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Approaching 2.59 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some key formatting and citation

errors are present.

2. Insufficient 2.42 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with

numerous formatting errors.

1. No Submission 0 points

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 3.5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

5. Target 3.5 points

Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and

content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.

4. Acceptable 3.05 points

Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective

sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language.

3. Approaching 2.59 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register)

and/or word choice are present.

2. Insufficient 2.42 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice

and/or sentence construction are used.

1. No Submission 0 points

Total 70 points