Is it Ethical to Steal to Feed One’s Family?
Order Instructions
Sources have to include 2 scholarly sources and one video, article or blog related to the case study. Using the file attached as the document to expand on. You want to use the paper attached as a basis of the content to write this one.
Part 1: Introduction, Case Study, Ethical Question (This section 300 words)
This section must include one quote from one of the resources provided with the case study. To complete this section,
Use the case study written by the writer (attached). Present a brief introduction to the case study.
Discuss background information. Identify the central moral controversy at stake in the case study.
Articulate an ethical question based on the central moral controversy.
Part 2: Reading Philosophy Reflection
In this section, use one of the philosophical texts associated with your chosen ethical theory listed below. It is copied and pasted here, and should be copied and pasted into the paper. (Whichever one you use).
A Theory of Justice – John Rawls
1. The circumstances of justice may be described as the normal conditions under
which human cooperation is both possible and necessary. Thus, as I noted at the
outset, although a society is a cooperative venture for mutual advantage, it is
typically marked by a conflict as well as an identity of interests. There is an
identity of interests since social cooperation makes possible a better life for all
than any would have if each were to try to live solely by his own efforts. There is
a conflict of interests since men are not indifferent as to how the greater benefits
produced by their collaboration are distributed, for in order to pursue their ends
they each prefer a larger to a lesser share. Thus, principles are needed for
choosing among the various social arrangements which determine this division of
advantages and for underwriting an agreement on the proper distributive shares.
These requirements define the role of justice. The background conditions that
give rise to these necessities are the circumstances of justice.
Rawls, J. (1990)
2. If wealth, position, and influence, and the accolades of social prestige, are a
person’s final purposes, then surely his conception of the good is egoistic. His
dominant interests are in himself, not merely, as they must always be, interests
of a self. There is no inconsistency, then, in supposing that once the veil of
ignorance is removed, the parties find that they have ties of sentiment and
affection and want to advance the interests of others and to see their ends
attained. But the postulate of mutual disinterest in the original position is made to
ensure that the principles of justice do not depend upon strong assumptions.
Recall that the original position is meant to incorporate widely shared and yet
weak conditions. A conception of justice should not presuppose, then, extensive
ties of natural sentiment. At the basis of the theory, one tries to assume as little
as possible.
Rawls, J. (1990)
Explain the key ideas in the text.
Discuss how your understanding of the text evolved after multiple reads.
This section should be around 150 words (excluding the philosophical text).
Part 3: Explanation of Utilitarianism or Deontology
In this section, describe the ethical theory of utilitarianism or deontology and explain its core principles. This section must include one quote from the provided resources on the ethical theory. To complete this section,
Discuss the historical background of the ethical theory and the philosopher(s) associated with it.
Explain the core moral principle of the theory, or if there is more than one, the principle that you will focus on in applying that theory to your question.
Demonstrate how the theory and its core moral principle(s) apply to an ethical question that is different than the topic of your case study. For example, what would deontologists say about the morality of lying, and what principle would support their statement; what would utilitarians say about the morality of using animals in medical research, and what principle would support their statement? This section should be around 350 words.
Part 4: Application of Ethical Theory
In this section, apply the core principle(s) you articulated above to the central moral controversy in the case study.
Explain how the core principle(s) of the ethical theory apply to the case study. This might include considering which facts or features of the case study lend themselves to analysis by the ethical theory.
Apply the core principles of the theory to the central moral controversy in the case study by showing how someone using the theory would answer the ethical question addressed by your case study.
This section should be around 350 words.
Must have an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.
Must include a separate title page with the following in title case:
title of paper in bold font
Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page.
student’s name
name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)
course name and number
instructor’s name
due date
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
