Educational leaders are responsible for ensuring that needs identified through a formal needs assessment are clearly addressed by improvement actions in the school’s Continuous Acti

Curriculum and Professional Development – Rubric

Analysis of School Needs Assessment and CIP 12 points

Criteria Description

Analysis of School Needs Assessment and CIP

5. Target 12 points

Summary proficiently summarizes the analysis between the school needs assessment data and the continuous

improvement plans.

4. Acceptable 10.44 points

Submission adequately summarizes the analysis between the school needs assessment data and the

continuous improvement plans.

3. Approaching 8.88 points

Submission simplistically summarizes the analysis between the school needs assessment data and the

continuous improvement plans.

2. Insufficient 8.28 points

Submission inadequately summarizes the analysis between the school needs assessment data and the

continuous improvement plans.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

CIP/SIP Addresses Identi�ed Needs 12 points

Criteria Description

Collapse All

CIP/SIP Addresses Identified Needs

5. Target 12 points

Submission thoroughly describes ways in which the CIP/SIP addresses the identified needs by using action

plans and measuring progress in the areas of curriculum and professional development.

4. Acceptable 10.44 points

Submission logically describes ways in which the CIP/SIP addresses the identified needs by using action plans

and measuring progress in the areas of curriculum and professional development.

3. Approaching 8.88 points

Submission minimally describes ways in which the CIP/SIP addresses the identified needs by using action plans

and measuring progress in the areas of curriculum and professional development.

2. Insufficient 8.28 points

Submission poorly describes ways in which the CIP/SIP addresses the identified needs by using action plans

and measuring progress in the areas of curriculum and professional development.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Organization 3 points

Criteria Description

Organization

5. Target 3 points

The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other.

The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Acceptable 2.61 points

The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience

with a clear sense of the main idea.

3. Approaching 2.22 points

The content is not well organized even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea.

2. Insufficient 2.07 points

An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are

compartmentalized and may not relate to each other.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Mechanics of Writing 3 points

Criteria Description

includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use

5. Target 3 points

Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and

content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.

4. Acceptable 2.61 points

Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective

sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language.

3. Approaching 2.22 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register)

and/or word choice are present.

2. Insufficient 2.07 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice

or sentence construction are used.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Total 30 points