For this assignment, you will build on the short paper you wrote in Module Five, in which you analyzed the results of Bobs intelligence and achievement testing. This week, you w
For this assignment, you will build on the short paper you wrote in Module Five, in which you analyzed the results of Bob’s intelligence and achievement testing. This week, you will communicate the results of the assessment in an ethical and strength-based manner to the patien
1
Bob’s Intelligence Achievement Report
My name
PSY-550-Measurement & Assessment
Dr. Frye
February 21, 2023
Bob’s Intelligence Achievement Report
The patient considered in this case is a 34-year-old Caucasian male named Bob Schmoe. He was referred for evaluation by a social worker from the Department of Rehabilitation. Using the Wechsler 2nd Edition Abbreviated Intelligence Scale (WASI-2), Bob's intelligence was measured. For subtests including both oral and nonverbal exercises, Bob was administered to obtain a full scale IQ (FSIQ) score (Wechsler, 2011). Another test for Bob is the -Revision 4 (WRAT-4) Wide Range Achievement Test. For Wechsler Abbreviated Scales of Intelligence, the average composite score on WASI extend from 90 to 109 (McCrimmon & Smith, 2013). This is to assess Bob's basic learning skills. The assessment also includes four sub-tests, namely sentence comprehension, spelling, word reading, and calculation (Wilkinson & Robertson, 2017). This report highlights Bob's performance on all administered subtests compared to his peers in the same age group, and information about Bob's performance on each comparable subset of all Other sub-tests are performed. This report will provide insights into Bob's current learning skills, which are important for future planning.
According to the results of WRAT-4, Bob's reading ability is said to be average compared to his peers. This could be a sign that Bob has good strength and experience with basic reading skills. In the sentence comprehension section, Bob scored 93, which is within the same average range as his peers. On the Reading Composite section, Bob's score is 95, which is average. Synthetic Reading combines tests of reading comprehension with sentences and reading words. An average score of suggests that Bob may have had prior experience in these areas. These are the areas where Bob has shown considerable strength. Other areas where Bob exhibits significant weakness include spelling tests and math calculations. In spelling, Bob scored a 78 within the range, indicating that he scored lower than his peers. In math, Bob scored 83, below average. This indicates that Bob will need help with spelling and math.
Wechsler Abbreviated Scales of Intelligence-2nd Edition (WASI-2), a method consisting of four subtests, two verbal and two nonverbal tests, was also used to measure Bob's intelligence. The results obtained show that his verbal reasoning skills are average and comparable to his peers. Bob scored 99 on the Language Comprehension Index, which is average and comparable to his typical peers. This is a strong point and shows that Bob can have little or no difficulty interacting with his friends in situations that require speaking skills. The Cognitive Reasoning Index is used to measure Bob's nonverbal reasoning skills and is said to be average and comparable to his peers. Considering Bob's nonverbal skills, when sub-scores are checked, it's clear that Bob's distinctive visual abilities are below average compared to his peers; thus becoming a weak point. However, his nonverbal problem-solving abilities were within the normal average.
Looking at Bob's scores on his intelligence and achievement tests, as measured by WASI-2 and WRAT-4, it is clear that Bob has well developed verbal reasoning skills. and non-verbal. This will help Bob a lot to keep up with his peers in these areas. However, he may have difficulty with image processing, spelling, and calculations. These prevent him from performing well on tasks that require correct spelling and complex mathematical calculations.
The main recommendation for Bob's condition is to regularly and often review the information to keep in mind. By relating the newly acquired information to what he has learned there before, he can better understand the information as well as improve its recall (block design). If needed, Bob can benefit from using speech tags in mnemonic activities. He should consider career options that focus on his speaking skills as well as those that do not involve more hands-on activities and those that do not require visual-spatial skills.
References
McCrimmon, A., & Smith, A.D. (2013). Review of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, Second Edition (WASI-II). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31, 337 – 341.
Wechsler D. (2011). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence–Second Edition (WASI-II). San Antonio, TX: NCS Pearson.
Wilkinson, S., & Robertson, G.J. (2017). Wide range achievement test | Fifth edition. (WRAT5) Retrieved from https://pearsonclinical.in/solutions/wide-range-achievement-test-fifth-edition-wrat5/
,
PSY 550 Module Eight Assignment Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: This assignment will allow you to consider ways to deliver the results of an assessment in an ethical and strength-based manner. You will be using the results from a previous assignment and transforming them into a transcript that could be used with a real-life client.
Prompt: Before you begin this assignment, revisit the short paper you wrote for Module Five, in which you analyzed the results of Bob’s intelligence and achievement testing. Specifically, you identified his strengths and weaknesses related to the WRAT-4 and WASI-2. Elements of your paper included Bob’s strengths and weaknesses, how his strengths and weaknesses applied to his overall functioning, and suggestions or recommendations for him.
For this assignment, you will be using the elements from that paper and turning them into a written or verbal transcript, as if you were delivering the results to Bob in real life. This must be done in an ethical manner, with the client’s best interests at the forefront of the delivery. You will be providing a review of the results in layman’s terms, using strength-based and nonjudgmental language and focusing on the summary of results, the use of strength-based language, the summary of recommendations, and an accurate portrayal of the findings.
Your assignment must be submitted as a written transcript, an audio recording, or a video. There is no page requirement or time requirement for this assignment as long as all critical elements are visited. Remember that your intended audience is Bob and not your instructor, so remember to speak directly to Bob when delivering the results. You should use the terms “you,” “your,” and “yours.”
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Summary of Results: Results from Module Five Short Paper are summarized in a manner that is organized and ethical. II. Use of Strength-Based Language: Appropriate, ethical language is used to speak to the patient. III. Summary of Recommendations: Recommendations from Module Five Short Paper are summarized in a manner that is organized and ethical. IV. Accurate Portrayal of Findings: Results and recommendations are accurately portrayed to the patient.
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: This assignment should be submitted as a Microsoft Word document (written transcript), MP3 file (audio), or MPG file (video).
Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value Summary of Results Summarizes results from Module Five
Short Paper in a manner that is organized and ethical
Summarizes results from Module Five Short Paper in a manner that is organized and ethical, but with inaccuracies or minimal details
Does not summarize results from Module Five Short Paper
22.5
Use of Strength-Based Language
Uses appropriate, ethical language to speak to the patient
Uses appropriate, ethical language to speak to the patient in some instances, but not throughout the entirety of the assignment
Does not use appropriate, ethical language to speak to the patient
22.5
Summary of Recommendations
Summarizes recommendations from Module Five Short Paper in a manner that is organized and ethical
Summarizes recommendations from Module Five Short Paper in a manner that is organized and ethical, but with inaccuracies or minimal details
Does not summarize recommendations from Module Five Short Paper in a manner that is organized and ethical
22.5
Accurate Portrayal of Findings
Portrays results and recommendations to the patient in an accurate manner
Portrays results and recommendations to the patient, but with inaccuracies or minimal details
Does not portray results and recommendations to the patient
22.5
Articulation of Response Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
10
Total 100%
- PSY 550 Module Eight Assignment Guidelines and Rubric
- Rubric
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
