Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of collaborating with physician organizations when pursuing FPA legislation. The discussion must address the topic. Rationale must be pr
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of collaborating with physician organizations when pursuing FPA legislation.
The discussion must address the topic.
Rationale must be provided
400 words in your initial
Minimum of two scholarly references in APA format within the last five years published
You must post two answers to your peers of 200 words
MSN-FNP Discussion Rubric
1
Criteria Does Not Meet (0%) Approaches (60%) Meets 80% Exceeds (100%) Total Initial Post relevance to the topic of discussion, applicability, and insight. (20%)
0
The student does not provide coverage of discussion topic (s); the student does not address the requirements of the weekly discussion. Provide redundant information. The posting does not apply to the course concepts or no example provided from the material explored during the weekly reading or from other relevant examples from the clinical practice. The student does not show applied
12 The student provides partial coverage of discussion topic (s), does not provide clarity on the key concepts; the student does not address all of the requirements of the weekly discussion. Provide redundant information. The posting does not apply to the course concepts or no example provided from the material explored during the weekly reading or from other relevant examples from the
16 The student provides complete coverage of discussion topic (s), provide clarity on the key concepts, demonstrated in the information presented; the student addresses all of the requirements of the weekly discussion question with adequate attention to details with some redundancy. The posting applies course concepts without examples learned from the material provided during the
20 The student provides in-depth coverage of discussion topic (s), outstanding clarity, and explanation of concepts demonstrated in the information presented; approaches the weekly discussion with depth and breadth, without redundancy, using clear and focused details. The posting directly addresses key issues, questions, or problems related to the topic of discussion. The posting applies course concepts with
MSN-FNP Discussion Rubric
2
knowledge and understanding of the discussion topic. The student's initial thread response does not reflect critical thinking.
clinical practice. The student shows some applied knowledge and understanding of the discussion topic. The student's initial thread response does not reflect critical thinking. The discussion topic is vaguely covered and does not adequately demonstrate an accurate understanding of concepts.
weekly reading or other relevant examples from the clinical practice. The student is still showing applied knowledge and understanding of the topic. Also, the posting offers original and thoughtful insight, synthesis, or observation that demonstrates an understanding of the concepts and ideas pertaining to the discussion topic (no use of example). The student's initial thread response reflects critical thinking and contains thought, insight, and analysis.
examples learned from the material provided during the weekly reading or other relevant examples from the clinical practice; the student is showing applied knowledge and understanding of the topic. Also, the posting offers original and thoughtful insight, synthesis, or observation that demonstrates a strong understanding of the concepts and ideas pertaining to the discussion topic (use of examples). The student's initial thread response is rich in critical thinking and full of thought, insight, and analysis;
MSN-FNP Discussion Rubric
3
the argument is clear and concise.
Quality of Written Communication Appropriateness of audience and words choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic, and varied. Grammar, spelling, punctuation. (20%)
0 The student uses a style and voice inappropriate or does not address the given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing (More than five grammatical errors). Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
12 The student uses a style and voice that is somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd. Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader (More than two grammatical errors). Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
16 The student uses a style and voice that are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word choice is specific and purposeful and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present but are not overly distracting to the reader (Less than two grammatical errors). Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
20 The student uses a style and voice that are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but that also shows originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic, and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures are used. The student is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
MSN-FNP Discussion Rubric
4
Inclusion of the student outcomes explored in the discussion as well as the role- specific competencies as applicable. (10%)
0 The student does not explain how the Student Learning Outcomes were explored or related to the weekly discussion topic.
6 The student does not explain how the Student Learning Outcomes were explored or related to the weekly discussion topic. The student only provides a list of the applicable Student Learning Outcome.
8 The student does not explain how the Student Learning Outcomes were explored or related to the weekly discussion topic.
10 The student provides an explanation of how the applicable Student Learning Outcomes were explored or related to the weekly discussion topic.
Rigor, currency, and relevance of the scholarly references. (20%)
0 The student does not provide any supporting scholarly references that are current or relevant to the weekly discussion topic.
12 The student provides supporting scholarly references that are not current but relevant to the weekly discussion topic. The student provides only one scholarly reference.
16 The student provides supporting scholarly references that are not current or but relevant to the weekly discussion topic. The student provides at least two scholarly references.
20 The student provides robust support from credible, current (less than five years old), and relevant scholarly references (at least two). The supporting evidence meets or exceeds the minimum number of required scholarly references.
MSN-FNP Discussion Rubric
5
Peer & Professor Responses. Number of responses, quality of response posts. (20%)
0 The student did not make an effort to participate in the learning discussion board. The student did not meet the answer post requirements, and the posts, if submitted, are reflecting a lack of engagement or providing a vague answer to the weekly topic. The student does not answer the professor's feedback/question.
12 The student does not provide substantive interaction relevant to the weekly topic or provide vague responses. The answer provided by the student does not build on the discussion question and ideas of others, utilizing course content with appropriate citation/references. The student does not motivate and encourage the group. The student does not respond to two peers. The student does not answer the professor's feedback/question.
16 The student provides substantive interaction relevant to the weekly topic. The answer provided by the student builds on the discussion question and ideas of others, utilizing course content with appropriate citation/references. The student provides frequent attempts to motivate and encourage the group. The student responds to at least two peers. The student does not answer the professor's feedback/question.
20 The student provides substantive interaction relevant to the weekly topic. The answer provided by the student builds on the discussion question and ideas of others, utilizing course content with appropriate citation/references. The student provides frequent attempts to motivate and encourage the group. The student responds to at least two peers and answers the professor's feedback/question.
MSN-FNP Discussion Rubric
6
Timeliness of the initial post and the answers to the peers. (10%)
0 The student was late for the initial post and the answer to peers, or absence of submissions.
6 The student posted the initial tread on time by 11:59 PM on Wednesday, or the student submits the initial thread late and submits the answers to peers on time.
8 The student posted the initial tread on time by 11:59 PM on Wednesday and one answer to a peer by Saturday 11:59 PM.
10 The student posted the initial thread and both answers to peers on time (Initial post by Wednesday 1159 PM and two replies to peers by Saturday 11:59 PM).
,
PEER 2 : CELESTINO
Some benefits of working with medical groups to advance FPA legislation include the following.
The patient care system and the patient's entire experience, from admission through discharge, can be enhanced by the coordinated efforts of physician groups that advocate for FPA legislation. Most hospitals have a whole staff of doctors and nurses available to treat patients. They support a care model built on a team approach that puts the patient first.
Decrease in the number of preventable medical mistakes. Miscommunication often has fatal or at least very harmful results in the healthcare industry. Signs might be overlooked, leading to incorrect diagnoses and even toxic treatments. Medical mistakes can be reduced by collaboration between physician groups.
Immediate care: these days, most medical services have long wait times. It has been observed that patients wait for doctors while doctors wait for each other to offer necessary assistance or consultations (Peacock et al.,2020). The patient may become agitated because of the time lag in receiving information. This is why it is so important for doctors to work toward improved means of communicating among themselves and why cooperation across medical practices is key to making this happen.
Each healthcare system's staff has its unique history, body of knowledge, and guiding philosophy that may be used to improve communication and morale. Some will get to the top if the number of powerful people rises. Patients' and workers' well-being should be concerned about this development. Working together across disciplines recognizes the value of all care team members and helps level the playing field.
There are a few drawbacks to working with medical groups to advance FPA legislation, which are;
To provide quality care, nurses often must work long shifts. Therefore, the hours are very long (Phillips, S. J. 2019). This causes nurse practitioners to struggle with juggling their personal and professional lives, leading to weariness and burnout. Inadequate staffing levels in the healthcare industry mean nurses regularly face increased patient loads. Too much information can cause worry and tension.
Skilled nurse practitioners have a less alluring job since they do almost as much work as physicians but are paid far less. Some registered nurses are put off by the lack of financial incentives in this position, and thus they explore alternatives in the nursing profession.
,
PEER 1 :ADIANYS
Introducing healthcare policies and delivery systems has become increasingly important in recent years. This has resulted in more attention to healthcare providers and their attention to attending patients. Additionally, with the introduction of the Affordable Care Act, there has been a significant increase in the need for collaboration between physician organizations and legislators when pursuing healthcare legislation. Collaboration with physician organizations can provide advantages and disadvantages when pursuing FPA legislation. This is because it can lead to better access to medical care but may limit the ability to address the underlying causes of healthcare disparities.
One advantage of collaborating with physician organizations when pursuing FPA legislation is the increased access to resources. Physician organizations have great knowledge and experience in healthcare policy and delivery systems. By working with these organizations, legislators can benefit from their expertise and also have access to resources such as expert testimony, research, and also legal advice. This can be invaluable in helping to craft effective and accurate legislation (Barton et al., 2021). Additionally, collaborating with physician organizations can improve access to medical care. By working together, physician organizations and legislators can identify and address healthcare disparities from race, ethnicity, gender, or income. This can lead to better care for underserved communities and improved healthcare outcomes.
One of the disadvantages of collaborating with physician organizations when pursuing FPA legislation is the potential for increased bureaucracy. The process of working with multiple stakeholders can take time and effort. This can lead to delays in the implementation of legislation (Luijks et al., 2021). This can be problematic for those needing immediate healthcare as legislation may need to be enacted more quickly to provide the necessary care. Furthermore, there is a high magnitude of potential conflict of interest. Physician organizations may greatly be influenced by cooperate interests or may have agendas that do not necessarily align with the goals of the FPA legislation (Moore et al., 2020). Therefore, this can lead to stalled progress or watered-down legislation that needs to address the issue adequately.
In summary, collaborating with physicians' organizations when pursuing federal policy action (FPA) legislation can have advantages and disadvantages. On one side, it can provide increased access to resources and improved access to medical care. On the other hand, it can result in increased bureaucracy and potential conflicts of interest. However, carefully collaborating and thoughtful consideration of all stakeholders can still achieve legislative success when working with physician organizations.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
