Consider the Annerstedt & Wahrbort (2011) article. In the Discussion and Conclusions sections, the authors outline several challenges and opportunities to applying nature-assisted therapy (N

Your concise response to a position statement, provided below, on the significance of scientific research supporting nature-engagement strategies for health and wellbeing. Responses must briefly discuss statistical vs clinical significance, extrapolating results to different populations, and accessibility and usability of sources of evidence. Students must justify their responses by citing the literature or class discussion and/or lectures.
Consider the Annerstedt & Wahrbort (2011) article. In the Discussion and Conclusions sections, the authors outline several challenges and opportunities to applying nature-assisted therapy (NAT) as an intervention. Discuss which of these challenges stood out to you as most notable. In addition, identify how statistical vs. clinical significance matters in research findings, based on the NAT evidence reviewed in the article.
Nature-assisted therapy systematic review of controlled and observational studies by Peter Währborg and Matilda Annerstedt